How do you know that what you believe in is true if you can't express it? — Manuel
:smirk:↪Tarskian Yes, yes, all that. So what? Give an example of one of these unstatable true sentences... — Banno
Nothing new in this insight – approximating, not "incompleteness…" — 180 Proof
parts (e.g. reason) cannot equal, let alone exceed, the whole (e.g. reality) to which they belong (i.e. in which they are inscribed-entangled) – i.e. reality is in our reach yet also exceeds our grasp because we are real and nothing more… — 180 Proof
"The overwhelmingly vast majority of truth cannot be expressed by language" is ambiguous. Is it to be understood, as I think Tarskian does, as saying that there are true statements that cannot be stated, (a contradiction), or is it to be understood as that while any particular truth can be stated, not every truth can ever be stated, which is a simple consequence of there being transfinite numbers. — Banno
Though, to split the difference, I agree with ↪unenlightened — Moliere
:roll:Approximation can be incomplete ... — ucarr
Another non sequitur.Reification has only a weak form under strategic incompleteness because no systems are finalized into hard boundaries.
Ad hominem. Besides, I'm not a "deist" and do not espouse "deism".your Deist god ...
I have neither claimed nor implied that "existence" is/was "initiated".... to initiate existence
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.