If somebody finds it problematic, I am open to any solution. — Carlo Roosen
I get banned if I tell too much about my project, because it would be self-promotion — Carlo Roosen
"Plus, honestly, you've shown no evidence that I'm aware of that you know anything interesting about anything at all, including AI. If you provide that evidence and don't engage in any self-promotion whatsoever from now on, you can stay. Otherwise, you may not be contributing to the site and may not be allowed to stay. — Baden
Just because I have a different opinion, that is no reason to ban me. — Carlo Roosen
Advertisers, spammers, self-promoters: No links to personal websites. Instant deletion of post followed by a potential ban.
The solution is we delete your posts and ban you.
What happened in the the other thread was that some posters who know about Kant tried to inform you about your misunderstandings concerning his philosophy. Your response there and here is to pretend that they were wrong to do so. — Baden
Is it ok if I refer to "Bubblespeak" in the future? I don't mind.
I can unpublish my website, I don't mind.
But people are asking for more information about my project. Even in this thread, unenlightened was asking more. How should I handle that? Earlier I said, look at my profile, you'll find a link. Mentioning that was allowed, according to jamal. I said a few times Google "Babelspeak", maybe that I shouldn't do?
I am reasonable. But please give me a workable solution. — Carlo Roosen
The plan is, it will be an autonomously operating AI that could take over the world if it had bad intentions. — Carlo Roosen
I seek to understand the limits of the uses, misuses & abuses of 'truth'.Are you a seeker of truth? — Carlo Roosen
Philosophy begns by reflecting on foundational questions which we do not know how to answer (yet), how to validly raise such questions without begging them and how to reformulate them ad infinitum or until they become empirically decidable (i.e. "applicable to reality"). As I understand it, the existential challenge is to adaptively make sense of reality in general and thereby strive to live accordingly. Seeking "to get answers" leads merely to (dogmatic, sophistical) religion, Carlo, and is not, imo, philosophy. You've come to the wrong site for "answers".[M]y challenge is going to be, to get answers that are applicable to reality.
This pseudo-question reminds me of silly maxims like "if man was meant to fly, he would have wings". Besides, "humanity" is a concept, sir, and not an individual who can "want". Instead of idling here like a child pondering on whether or not s/he "should want" to learn from (an) adult(s), build a "superhuman artificial intelligence" first so that then you/we can discuss with it what questions it/we should by asking.. :brow:Should humanity even want to build this SHAI?
Your idea (see, not so hard) — Outlander
Incidentally, just don't put links to your work, don't talk about fund-raising, and talk sensibly about what you are interested in, and there will be no problems. — unenlightened
This viewpoint has changed over different time periods. Right now I have the feeling that philosophic viewpoints have dogmatic aspects. People on the forum said it is not allowed to talk about fundamental reality...Seeking "to get answers" leads merely to (dogmatic, sophistical) religion, Carlo, and is not, imo, philosophy. — 180 Proof
People on the forum said it is not allowed to talk about fundamental reality... — Carlo Roosen
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.