How Do We Measure Wisdom, or is it Easier To Talk About Foolishness?
-Wisdom
noun
1. the quality of having experience, knowledge, and good judgement; the quality of being wise.
"listen to his words of wisdom"
- the fact of being based on sensible or wise thinking.
"some questioned the wisdom of building the dam so close to an active volcano"
- the body of knowledge and experience that develops within a specified society or period.
plural noun: wisdoms
"Eastern wisdom"
-Good
noun
1. that which is morally right; righteousness.
"a mysterious balance of good and evil"
2. benefit or advantage to someone or something.
"he convinces his father to use his genius for the good of mankind"
-Foolish
adj
lacking good sense or judgement; unwise.
"he was foolish enough to confide in her"
When fundamentally and unbiasedly approached the word "Good" is biased towards an observer, the act of something done towards an observer be it morally right, advantageous or a benefit.
But the word has no consideration to the individual producing the act itself because it may not be "Good" or moral for them which can lead to fault ethically.
So wisdom itself is biased in concept with no regard of anothers ethics or truth as the mentioned "knowledge" or "experience" can be prone to misinterpretation or false/assumed knowledge.
Maybe it is better to measure a person's way of thought by how well they understand fault, like biases, assumptions, misinformation and fallacies.