It is hard being human, and I think we need to lighten up — Athena
If we had the power of the gods, what would we change? And what is wrong with what we have done that we can not be proud of what we have achieved? How can we judge that without knowing the ideal that we should achieve? — Athena
Maybe our evolution is what it is and can not be different? — Athena
Yes, she's taught high school English in a variety of districts—some more liberal, others more conservative; some affluent, and others less so.
Even the insistence on whole language over phonics is 'woke'.
— Jeremy Murray
It's quite a stretch to consider the Science of Reading movement woke. — praxis
But the US is far less "woke" than most of Europe and the anglosphere, so by this logic we should all be envying the remarkably peaceful and disciplined American schools. — Mijin
The reality is that it's the ways that the US genuinely is an outlier that makes schools more chaotic. Poor public funding, genuine poverty, a violent culture and parents who are suspicious of experts and science. — Mijin
A personal bugbear for me is also how high schools are depicted on US TV. Every single time, even if it's a Disney movie or whatever, bullying is a significant plot point.
Don't get me wrong; kids are people and some people are jerks. Bullying happens. But having it central to the high school experience seems to normalize it IMO. Other countries manage to tell stories about kids that don't have to center around that behavior. — Mijin
Literacy rates are typically attributed to socioeconomics, instruction quality, funding and resources, language barriers, and broader social factors like nutrition, healthcare, and family support. How does wokeness impact any of that? — praxis
the more impersonal we are, the more we need social rules.
Help me, how should this be explained? It is not natural for us to live in these huge cities where our lives are full of strangers. Without established relationships, there is a lot that can go wrong. — Athena
By contrast, the modern tend to pay far less attention to the identifiers the right wants to focus on: ethnicity, religion, class (ironically*), regionalism, etc. Why? Because the enlightened liberal presumably transcends these categories. They are personally responsible for ditching their religion or finding an appropriately modern/progressive variant, reducing ethnic customs down to an acceptable limit, "moving out of fly-over country," etc. Ethnicity, regionalism, and even religion might be thought to be more tied to place, and the ideal liberal citizen has transcended place, while each place itself also becomes every other place. — Count Timothy von Icarus
Sexual orientation and gender are interesting here. There is an intense focus on presenting these as immutable, inborn characteristics, precisely because then they would fit the same criteria as sex and race. Hence the backlash about the idea of people being "transracial," or against research that suggested a degree of social contagion in gender dysphoria. It is important that people are "born this way" for the paradigm. — Count Timothy von Icarus
* Before anyone says anything, I am not suggesting that the left doesn't pay attention redistributive economics aimed at the lower end of the income distribution. I am pointing out that they no longer focus on class as an identity, nor particularly on "class discrimination." It's the right now that seems to more often appeal to "elitism." — Count Timothy von Icarus
And the woke are unable to properly deal with shooting Charlie Kirk, for instance. The general woke response to Kirk’s shooting is that, it was wrong of course, but Kirk was a hateful idiot who practically asked for it. — Fire Ologist
Absolutely, though it's not clear how much of these failures you're attributing to wokeism. I'm sure that plays a part. Anyway, funny coincidence that my wife did her initial teacher training at about the same time, teaching High School English, in the deep blue state of California. — praxis
Could there be a relationship between this modern "in your face" sexuality and Woke? — Athena
It would be interesting to hear from someone that was full-on woke, but who has repented, to see how he was able to make peace with what he was doing. — NOS4A2
Mischaracterizing CRT as something taught in public school — Mijin
My general impression is that, broadly speaking, the median Woke position is simply contradictory. It is morally and epistemically anti-realist and strongly relativistic, while at the same time being absolutist. This is, in many cases, an unresolved, and perhaps often unacknowledged contradiction. — Count Timothy von Icarus
AmadeusD3.6k
I also think it is a characteristic of woke - if the other party doesn’t appear to agree with you, they must need to reevaluate their whole approach so let’s talk about that instead of whatever thing we both disagree with.
— Fire Ologist — AmadeusD
have you found "woke" to be a postmodernist thing? — jorndoe
For instance, the question of why shouldn’t a society bend to the weak? Efficiency, predictability, and hoarding wealth & power are also forms of weakness. — praxis
Like the Kirk shooting video, I wish I could unsee that. — praxis
Contrary to Fire’s rewriting of history, wokeness doesn’t go back to Karl Marx. It is also rather narrow in focus compared to full-bodied wokeness. — praxis
Andrea Long Chu — AmadeusD
Not as predictable as you describe — AmadeusD
I've only read anti-woke books like Cynical Theories by Helen Pluckrose and James Lindsay, Material Girls by Kathleen Stock, and really awful ones like Woke, Inc. (on a par with DiAngelo awfulness I imagine). Though I've read some woke-adjacent books like The New Jim Crow by Michelle Alexander. — praxis
Activist control mechanism. I can picture the herding that often accompanies the woke - the control mechanics of it (and I’m interested in further thoughts about how a shepherd can use wokeness to control the activist); — Fire Ologist
There is a philosophy in there. It’s basically post-modernist mental acrobatics applied to hurting those in power (really, white men) (with no concern for who is thereby helped, and no concern for why someone might have this power) — Fire Ologist
It’s unwoke to define something clearly - definition itself is an oppression. A well articulated principle is like authoritarian law, and tyranny. — Fire Ologist
among the least critical thinkers I’ve met. — Fire Ologist
100%. History, and the best folks history could muster, are tools (if not wisdom), and we are robbing students today of so many great ideas and turns of phrase and experiences, in the name of trendy dalliances like patriarchy, and socially constructed body parts. Bring on the new ideas, for sure, but don’t throw out Shakespeare and Aristotle because a few things they said might offend certain western suburban sensibilities. — Fire Ologist
. But teenagers don’t need to be over-taught that challenging authority is a goal; most of them will challenge authority by nature as teenagers. My sense is that, if we reify the challenging of authority, and throw out all of the authorities and institutions before they get their own chance to rebel against them, they don’t ever really get past adolescence — Fire Ologist
Better to give them a master and teach them to kill — Fire Ologist
But in the end, the good is less about what you think and can teach, and more about what you do. And regardless of any religious beliefs, some people just do a lot of good. — Fire Ologist
The post-modern is so relativist, they can be or value anything, including their own total self-contradiction, and with straight face be the right kind of absolute dogmatist when the mood suits them. — Fire Ologist
When the moral goal post of can be moved, there may as well be no goal post. — Fire Ologist
I have been over this. It's becoming really frustrating(not you personally - but note if anything seems terse, it's not on purpose): — AmadeusD
Allowing each individual to simply shoehorn 'virtue' in to their moral system is extremely dangerous. — AmadeusD
Allowing each individual to simply shoehorn 'virtue' in to their moral system is extremely dangerous. It may be why its so popular - it requires next to no critical thinking and practically no self-accountability. There are those who do it 'properly' as such. But the dangers are so much heavier than the potential benefits. — AmadeusD
I understand what you're saying, but there are no arguments which support anything else as, at least, a metaethical way of framing things — AmadeusD
This is absolutely the correct objection to that type of relativism (which isn't relativism, it's just self-involvement; not a serious moral thought to be found in those types). — AmadeusD
Yeah pretty much. There's essentially four equal parts in professional philosophy.. roughly like 25% deontology (or some form of); 25% some form of consequentialism; 25% Virtue Ethics (its slightly higher for VE actually, i'm just simplifying) and the final slice for "alternate" — AmadeusD
I don't really have a 'system'. What I think its 'right' applies to me and only me. I can try to enforce this where i think it is relevant but I am under no illusions that I should be persuasive, or be listened to. — AmadeusD
Hey Jeremy,
I hope you don’t mind me hijacking your questions for Count. — Fire Ologist
I might say I see it as more of a method, than it is actual content. It’s like a metaphysical spell-checker. — Fire Ologist
And artists are always the best at working the medium (creating the best content for irony’s sake), so if there is a lasting impact to post-modernist thought, I suspect it will be from the arts, and not from philosophy or the humanities. — Fire Ologist
But really, post-modernism has no inherent content. Even existentialism had the human condition and history and a fading sense of pride as its focus, which is why Nietzsche and Dostoyevsky and Goethe and Camus and Satre are so much more compelling to read than Wittgenstein, Derrida, Foucault and anyone since, who tried to run with this spirit of meaningless meaning making — Fire Ologist
because even post-modernists resist being called a relativists, and as such, have come up with some of the most rigid, oppressive moral codes and dogmatic systems (DEI/political correctness, race/women/sexuality/gender dogma, climate change social virtue, anything conservative and capitalist and republican and religious is evil/facist, etc.). The post-modern is so relativist, they can be or value anything, including their own total self-contradiction, and with straight face be the right kind of absolute dogmatist when the mood suits them. — Fire Ologist
Disruption for disruption sake is the virtue. — Fire Ologist
I think your attitude towards the theist exemplifies my attitude toward the atheist; there is plenty of philosophy and science and practicality and wisdom to share in addition to or just without mentioning God or religion. — Fire Ologist
isn’t a story told in love always more interesting and more revealing than whatever the brain state/behavior facts/functionalist emergence story could possibly be? — Fire Ologist
Religious institution and the word of God himself make it easier for many to accept that there is a true good we either seek or fail to have — Fire Ologist
if you don’t watch out God may show up yet. — Fire Ologist
Trump is not a conservative in any meaningful sense. He’s someone who has hijacked conservatism for his own ends, and evicted many meaningful dissent from the Republican Party. There are some skilled Republican operatives who are using all of this as a vehicle, like remora fish around the great white shark, but none of the classical conservatives would recognise what the Republican Party has become. — Wayfarer
I would probably agree, but further posit we are post-mass media to a degree, as the internet has allowed people to sink further and further into soloed entertainment. — MrLiminal
I would say that's what it's always been, to a degree. As I said above, I think the larger problem is that our increasing levels of internal navel gazing is making it difficult to see differing ideas as something to entertain. If everyone you know always agrees with you, why would you ever want to talk to someone that didn't? — MrLiminal
This "mostly peaceful" shit has got to stop. By numbers? Maybe. That isn't the point. — AmadeusD
Subjectively — Vera Mont
Okay. Which processes are art and which are industry or mundane life? — Vera Mont
So, basically everybody who tells a story, whether you know what stories they told or not — Vera Mont
You have little alternative to using your own judgment, unless you simply go along with what the majority likes or what critics like. — Vera Mont
meatspace — MrLiminal
I'm a registered Independent who has never voted for Trump, but I find myself increasingly alone politically as I don't fully agree with either side, despite previously leaning more left. Neither party seems interested in much aside from getting re-elected by telling you how bad the other party is. — MrLiminal
I suspect we are in the midst of another party realignment — MrLiminal
Trump is a textbook demagogue — Wayfarer
Once, back then, I was looking for the hospital meeting room my quit-smoking group had been assigned to, and I mistook the number and opened the door on a Gambling Anonymous group. I was struck by how different the two groups looked! A totally different demographic. — BC
I think it's an abomination when people at the supermarket buy stacks of lottery tickets. The odds are stacked heavily against their winning a ¢, and they aren't going to get an arts grant from the fund. Ditto for horse racing, sports betting, on-line gambling, or real slot machines and poker games, etc. — BC
Public health, public order, law enforcement, and various community interests have conflicting goals and conflicting constituencies. Conflicts makes it difficult for legislators to decide what to allow and what to forbid -- for legalization of addictive substances, criminalization, and for harm reduction. Then there is tax revenue. — BC
I have mixed feelings and thoughts about legalizing cannabis. On the one hand, pot doesn't do for me what it seems to do for other people, which is annoying. On the other, getting high is a form of intoxication. I have nothing against intoxication (been there), but driving high and driving drunk aren't all that much different. At least that's what I've gathered. I guess one should have a sober designated driver for pot, too.
I'm 78. Maybe it gets harder to get pleasantly high as one ages? — BC
Hemingway's is; grandfather's isn't; Charles Dickens, yes; the Ojibway elder, no. If Chekov, yes, what about Roddenberry? Situational, comparative and subjective. — Vera Mont
there is tattooing, which requires skill to do well, but the tattoo artist is usually working from a template, rather creating something original — Vera Mont
what if someone is just trolling? Or if someone misunderstands the definition of art entirely? Could we tell the difference between sincerity and insincerity? Also, choosing randomness is still a choice, and a meaningful one I think. — Pinprick
Is popular culture, like pro wrestling? — Jeremy Murray
I haven’t considered it as art, because it seems to primarily be about entertainment. I don’t see much storytelling in it typically. But, I see how it could be viewed as a sort of loosely choreographed interpretative dance. — Pinprick
Yes, I think violence can be an art. Case in point: martial arts — MrLiminal
Did people start patronizing pain clinics because they had refractory pain and then got hooked on opioids (pull), or did they become interested in opioids because a pain clinic had opened nearby and a Rx was easy to get (push)?
Are prostitutes more or less available because men's demands for quick blow jobs for a fee (or whatever is desired) resulted in women (or men) becoming prostitutes (pull), or did otherwise unemployed women needing income initiate prostitution (push)? — BC
Another angle on pushing: One of the strategies of cutting down on overdose deaths and disease transmission connected to drug use is to open supervised shooting galleries where sterile equipment, dosage, and bad reactions can be properly managed on the spot — BC
Love is an experience shared by all. — GregW
Do you know this for certain? I’ve worked with a lot of career criminals and gang members, and I would say that some people never experience love and, as a result, may not be able to give or receive it. — Tom Storm
I experience love as a given. Walking along the river on a beautiful sunny day can intensify that feeling of love. I feel loved simply because I feel love. I can totally relate to the Christian notion that God is love, even though I think the Biblical explanation of God. Satan and sin are messed up. Believing in a personal God has unpleasant consequences, necessitating deifying Jesus as a personal savior. — Athena
If there is built-in safety, is it violence? — Vera Mont
If designating oneself an artist makes it legitimate, so does designating oneself an art critic. — Vera Mont
I started with Nietzsche, the existentialists, and post-modern thinkers. I read a decent amount, but wasn't a huge student of philosophy. What got my into philosophy was studying the natural sciences, particularly biology and physics and the role of information theory, complexity studies, and computation in those fields. Most of my early threads on that sort of thing. I was of the opinion that useful philosophy stayed close to the contemporary sciences. — Count Timothy von Icarus
It was through studying information theory and semiotics that I got introduced to Aristotle and the Scholastics. I came to discover that, not only were their ideas applicable to "natural philosophy/science," but they also tied it together with metaphysics, ethics, politics, etc — Count Timothy von Icarus
Philosophical Mysticism in Plato, Hegel, and the Present — Count Timothy von Icarus
Or, for a third direction, you could start with Dante (which is more fun!) — Count Timothy von Icarus
it also tends to be heavy on theology. — Count Timothy von Icarus
When it comes to epistemic virtues, it seems like it is easier for people to agree
consider the scientist who falsifies her data in order to support her thesis. She cares more about the honor of being seen to be right than actually being right, or perhaps she is more motivated by book sales, which allow her to satisfy her appetites, than she is in producing good scholarship
how is it a given that moral virtue is an epistemic virtue?
Trans activists fucked up. — frank
Agreed.
And honestly, I find it hard to wrap my head around the absolute shit tsunami of suffering that has been created by all of these invasive medications and procedures on children who may very well have been 'going through a phase'.
In a hundred years, people will be looking back at this in the same way we look back at lobotomies and witch burnings - like we are primitive savages. Perhaps we are. — Tzeentch
Also, the other thing to keep in mind is art is intentional. Every movement potentially has purpose and is completed in order to achieve a desired result. Bob Flanagan chose to mutilate himself in certain ways, with specific utensils and settings and order of events. The same way a painter chooses certain paint types, colors, canvases, etc. — Pinprick
. I have a bit of an issue with legislating such "protections" — Banno
The first finding in CASS is - lack of such an evidence base. Then noting "conflicting views among clinicians regarding appropriate treatment."
The recommendations lean in the right direction. — Banno
I'm involved in health consumer advocacy hereabouts — Banno
I asked you over and over again for either evidence or sophisticated argument. — Jeremy Murray
And ignored the reasons given for not doing so. — Banno
Keep going, if you like. encourage me to admire your views even less. — Banno
Makes a mess of the conservative desire to force everyone into one of two fixed boxes because complexity and ambiguity make them uncomfortable. — Banno
Perhaps your aim was to change my mind, but the result has been to reinforce my view of an unreasoning, wilfully ill-informed and ideologically driven opposition to trans discussions. — Banno
Your tone is confrontational rather than enquiring, your evidence one-sided and your logic dubious. — Banno
You came here to prove your point, not to discuss the topic. That's fine, if tedious. — Banno
Based on this review, there is an extremely low prevalence of regret in transgender patients after GAS." — RogueAI
Why so long? Slow internet connection? If you would be an instant expert you might need to upgrade your network.
I can do it too. — Banno
I'm not seeing anything interesting accruing from this discussion. — Banno
Pretending that there is no evidence in support of the efficacy of puberty blockers is pretty poor. — Banno
Isn't there a danger there that someone who is serious about gender reassignment down the road could benefit from puberty blockers at adolescence and we're taking away that option? — RogueAI
They give them in early puberty and the consequences are permanent infertility and sexual dysfunction. — frank
this forum is not the place to evaluate the evidence, and we are not the people to do the evaluation. Instant expert syndrome is at play here. — Banno
If your move is just the rhetorical one of calling evidence with which you disagree, "dogma", then there is no point in showing you the evidence. — Banno
Now there is a rather large and growing body of evidence concerning puberty blockers. — Banno
I didn't use an analogy — Banno
You are quite presumptive in your response — Banno
No. He was making a spectacle out of physical and mental illness. — Vera Mont
Do you think that the State ought legislate to override the professional decisions of a child's carers and doctors, as well as parents, with a general piece of legislation that cannot take into account the context in which that decision is made? — Banno
Philosophically I don’t think anyone can jump the gap of their sex and become the opposite gender or non gender. The sex of a person is there for everyone to see unless there is significant surgery and synthetic hormones used. — Malcolm Parry
I assume even the most radical trans advocate has acknowledged that female sports is not a place for trans women. — Malcolm Parry
I have no issue with someone adopting the stereotypical norms of the opposite gender but that is cosplaying and does not reflect the reality that men and women can be whoever they like to be. — Malcolm Parry
Yes! Poor locker room design is the issue. Why do we have locker rooms that force us to differentiate on the basis of our genitalia? If the issue is modesty, why not have individual cubicles? — Banno