Therefore, this soteriological system is unjust — Empedocles
If a particle only occupied discrete states then according to your theory it would have to jump from position to position while moving. It would necessarily have to stop at each position for the time it would take to continuously travel between two of the positions. — SteveKlinko
Unless you can argue that the notion of a one-to-one correspondence is logically incoherent — MindForged
I, for instance, do not find the beginning of time to be any easier to conceive than an infinite past, — SophistiCat
The set of rationals is easily defined — tim wood
They don't produce two different concepts. — MindForged
it's two ways of defining instances of the same concept. — MindForged
You don't have to list out all the members of a set to define it. Seriously, sets are defined intensionally all the time. — MindForged
I understand that you do not understand what actual infinity is. — Magnus Anderson
so you make a distinction between something you call "Absolute" infinity and any other sort of infinity. I don't know what that difference is, — SophistiCat
I'm assuming a sphere. Or is a sphere not possible? — tim wood
infinite number is a number that is larger than any finite number. An infinite number is not larger than any infinite number — Magnus Anderson