John McEnroe: Serena Williams would rank 'like 700 in the world' in men's circuit play I've been told that a common women's fantasy is the opposite: to have the singular devotion and attention of one man they admire. If that's true, how can we account for these conflicting fantasies in a relationship? — geospiza
Hmmm...please do not count me in that idea of a woman's fantasy because for me, that is what I experience in the marriage of 22 yrs married, 26 holding hands. While it was a fantasy before I got married, the idea of singular devotion is way to restrictive for my fantasies. My fantasies rarely involve just one person being present and sometimes only involve me.
Having said that: I think it is fair that I share that my husband wanted an "open marriage" when I met him and I was just out of a relationship and not looking for anyone to commit to, yet still resisted the idea of an "open marriage". Five years later we redefined what marriage looked like which included the option of having a third person join given they agreed to a few rules.
Odd it is that we have yet to run across someone that exceeds or even meets our rules for play. So even though it is possible, we have never found another person that was worth it.
It follows the mantra that we have had since we redefined our marriage which is: "I want you to be here with me, as long as you want to be. Not a day longer, not a day less."
I think by leaving the door open, knowing that you would not hate the other if they chose to walk away, allows us to want to stay. I am not really sure, nor do I want to dissect this beautiful flower into it's parts and pieces, to figure out what "it" is that allows us to stay together contently. But I can tell you it is not without work and both pursuing goals together that we would never have achieved on our own.
ps. for the literal thinker, when we speak of being there not a "day" longer, we are not talking about AN argument, A disagreement or A spat. We are speaking of not wanting to be there anymore. Period. Full Stop.