Consider the zero tolerance policy that led to separating parents from children. Trump thought this would be a deterrent and ignored the morality (and associated public backlash) and the stress this would place on the immigration courts. Lessons learned: morality should be considered and given priority; consider the consequences of planned actions and plan for dealing with those consequences. — Relativist
I watched it happen, supported the law being enforced and since listened and heard from many here on the forum and agree that it's consequences were inhumane.
Consider Trump's rhetoric and the possibility that this contributed to a rush to the anticipated soon-to-be-closed border. Lesson learned: words can have consequences, and may even exacerbate the problem you're complaining about. — Relativist
With all due respect, I am not "complaining" about anything. I am asking for there to be a shred of belief in what I am saying, what I am witnessing in my community IS happening and not being summarily dismissed because I am someone who voted for President Trump.
Having said that: yes words have consequences and as you suggested in the separation of children from their parents; actions have consequences but a lack of action has consequences as well. The lack of action is what I am attempting to address and true to form, the first step to addressing a problem is admitting that we have one, which you can see is tenuous at best.
Trump preached that the wall would solve all important problems, ignoring credible criticism. — Relativist
No Sir. President Trump did not preach that the wall would solve all important problems. His suggestion of repairing the existing wall and extending it is not something that is novel to President Trump. The difference between his administration and past administrations is that this administration means what they say and say what they mean, for better or for worse. President Trump ran on enforcing the immigration laws and updating them and that is not something I am against. I am not in lock step with his approach, his suggestions, his administrations actions but I can say that he is trying to do something.
Lesson: take criticism seriously, rather than dismissing it. Identify all the problems, by soliciting input and analysis from across both parties and a variety of backgrounds and expertise. Identify potential solutions and anticipate benefits, costs, and negative consequences to each. Anticipate that course corrections will be needed. — Relativist
Living in a border state I am well aware of how much the CBP have been consulted and to suggest that they are not experts is erroneous. Additionally I have friends who live in the immediate communities that refuges are being released into in addition to those being bused up to Phoenix.
The focus should be on problem solving, rather than "winning". — Relativist
Whatever. If we are going to fall back on hyperbole then we are probably not making much progress here.
Trump has threatened to cut off aid to the Central American Countries to punish them for failing to prevent their residents from coming to the US. Experts have noted that this is likely to result in MORE migrations, not fewer. Even if one is skeptical of this, one should consider the possibility the critics are right. Perhaps MORE aid would help. Perhaps more control of the way the aid is spent should be sought - I don't know, but it can certainly be considered and studied. — Relativist
Yes, I agree that more control over the way the aid is spent should be sought is an absolute. It is one of the reasons the President is cutting off financial support, because the money is not making it to the people as a result of the government corruption. The aid is not being cut off to punish any refugees.
Trump has frequently complained about our immigration laws. Lesson learned: at best this is ineffective; at worst it is divisive. Why hasn't he asked for a bi-partisan commission to revise the laws (accepting reasonable compromise) to make them more workable? — Relativist
Maybe he has? I know that right now there are enough people in denial that this humanitarian crisis even exists that I understand the frustration he is feeling.
And speaking of compromise: Trump and the Republicans have failed to reach out to Democrats on any major policies (not just immigration). They treat "compromise" as a bad word, an anathema to be avoided at all costs. Lesson learned: bipartisanship is a good thing. Compromise should not be considered a loss, or caving in - rather it is a way to progress. — Relativist
Compromise is a good thing when done in good faith. Honesty is just as necessary as compromise and we don't have a united front on honesty yet and until we do, anything we try is doomed to fail.