Any time any political official cites "Deep State" (especially capitalized) as the cause for something, we all know they are spewing nonsense. We also all know that the people involved with Epstein weren't limited to on particularly political party. Perverts transcend politics. People on "both sides" of the political aisle are involved. — StevenF · May 8, 2025
And has ever corruption been so evident? With the Qatari gift of a luxury jet for Trump, never. And this was the person the Trumpists believed to root out corruption and "drain the swamp"! :lol:
After the presidency, the 400 million or so luxury jet goes to the Trump Presidential Library Association... not to be part of the US Presidential fleet. — ssu
The people in congress is only interested in maintaining their individual power — Christoffer
Underwood: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. This weekend, the president made the remarkable statement that he doesn't know whether he has to uphold the Constitution. You, however, have taken a different position both in your confirmation hearing and when you took the oath of office. You said that you were committed to complying with the Constitution. Do you still stand by that statement?
Noem: Absolutely. I believe President Trump ...
Underwood: Excellent. Let's start with Article 1, which gives Congress and only Congress the power of the purse. No money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in consequence of appropriations made by law. But this administration is freezing, terminating, and even clawing back federal grants and awards that were already signed into law. These are taxpayer dollars that were appropriated by Congress for the specific purposes that we laid out. So Secretary, let me ask you, do you believe the administration has the authority to subvert appropriations law to freeze and terminate congressional funding?
Noem: The administration and the Department of Homeland Security used our authorities that we have to evaluate every grant that was in front of us and made statutory requirements but also to make sure that they were being spent appropriate ...
Underwood: So of course the president is within his authority ...
Noem: ... to make sure ...
Underwood: Ma'am this is my time. Thank you so much. Of course, President, the president is within his authorities to drive policy decisions within the bounds of federal law and the Constitution, but that's not what you've been doing. What I'm asking is whether you believe you have the authority to ignore appropriations law. Do you believe that the Constitution gives the executive branch unilateral authority to withhold funds appropriated by the legislative branch?
Noem: We have evaluated grants to make sure if they're being spent appropriately, and work that is underway and was authorized has continued. Other grants that have not been started and have not been authorized or obligated, we have re-evaluated and I think you're talking specifically about grants potentially within FEMA that were non-disaster related grants ...
Underwood: I'm talking broadly, ma'am, and Article 2 does not give the executive the authority to withhold funds, period. And multiple courts have weighed in to agree. Multiple courts have ruled in agreement. Congress controls the power of the purse.
Noem: ... We're ...
Underwood: That is a fact. That's not a question. That is a fact. And so if the president disagrees with certain spending, Congress passed the Empowerment Act to create a legal process to seek rescission, and we expect him to follow the law. This administration is not just ignoring the constitutional power of the people's elected representatives. It is also violating the fundamental right of individuals. Do you believe that the Constitution grants everyone in our country the right to due process, including noncitizens?
Noem: The administration has the authority to ...
Underwood: Ma'am, I'm looking for a yes or no question. Yes or no. Do you believe the ... Ma'am?
Noem: ...
Underwood: Claiming my time. Mr. Chairman?
Noem: ...
Underwood: OK, Secretary Noam, I'm just looking for a yes or no here. Do you believe the Constitution guarantees due process to everyone in America?
Noem: Due process is exactly what this Congress ...
Underwood: Yes or no. OK, ma'am, I'll take that as a "No".
Noem: ... due process ...
Underwood: Excuse me, I'm trying, ma'am, I'm trying to ascertain your understanding of the law as it applies to your department, and you as this leader should be able to give us a yes or no answer because judge after judge has ruled that the law is not being followed. Do you believe that the US government has the authority to deport American citizens?
Noem: No, and we are not deporting US citizens.
Underwood: OK, great. I'm so happy to hear that you do not believe that the law gives you that authority because the federal government has no authority under US laws to deport any American citizen, and as I know, everyone during this hearing today knows that several American citizens have been deported to date.
Noem: ... That's not true ...
Underwood: Secretary Noem, that was not a question. Secretary Noem, that oath that we both swore before taking office was to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, not the president, not a political party, the Constitution. And that's what we're going to keep doing here at the Appropriations Committee. Thank you, Ayo back.
— Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem Testifies at Oversight Hearing · C-SPAN · May 6, 2025
Marco Rubio’s language in his X post mirrors rhetoric that could have been applied to the Nazi Party (NSDAP) in 1932-1933 by framing the AfD as a legitimate opposition unfairly targeted by the state, a tactic the NSDAP used to gain sympathy before Hitler’s rise to power via the Enabling Act on March 23, 1933.
The NSDAP, like the AfD today, positioned itself as a populist alternative to the establishment, criticizing Weimar Republic policies such as reparations and liberal governance, much as Rubio critiques Germany’s “open border immigration policies” as the true extremism.
Rubio’s claim that Germany’s surveillance of AfD is “tyranny in disguise” echoes how the NSDAP decried Weimar government actions—like banning Nazi paramilitary groups—as undemocratic overreach, a narrative that helped them gain broader support among Germans feeling disenfranchised.
In 1932, the NSDAP was the second-largest party in the Reichstag elections with 37.3% of the vote, similar to AfD’s recent second-place finish in German elections, a parallel Rubio uses to legitimize AfD’s popularity while ignoring its extremist rhetoric.
The NSDAP capitalized on economic despair and anti-immigrant sentiment, scapegoating Jews and other minorities, much like AfD’s platform focuses on anti-Muslim immigration policies, which Rubio indirectly endorses by attacking the German establishment’s stance.
Rubio’s defense of AfD overlooks its documented Holocaust relativization, a stance that aligns with NSDAP’s early efforts to rewrite history—by 1933, the Nazis were already suppressing Jewish narratives and promoting revisionist history to downplay their crimes.
Historical context: The NSDAP gained traction by exploiting fears of communism, often falsely equating their enemies with communists, a tactic AfD mirrors by comparing modern German leaders to East German secret police, as noted in Wikipedia’s AfD entry [web ID: 1].
Rubio’s rhetoric fits a pattern of U.S. conservative figures like Elon Musk and JD Vance supporting AfD, despite its extremist ties, reflecting a broader Trump-era shift toward aligning with far-right European movements that echo historical fascist strategies. — Grok AI
Because it’s an excuse to continue the war, to continue spending billions more lining the pockets of Lockheed Martin et al., and because it increases the chances of direct confrontation with Russia. — Mikie
Russia will not attack unless Putin could occupy all the Baltic countries in two or three days. Today he might be able to do this. If the Germans, French, Italians, British, Spanish, Canadians moved their army to the Baltic countries, he will not be able to do it. If Putin sees that Europeans are too weak, he will attack. — Thomas Theiner
Living things are architects: sometimes profoundly altering the earth to meet their needs. This has been going practically since life first appeared. People who think climate change is a moral issue because it's evil to transform the world are just misinformed about the nature of life. — frank
Russia’s threats to take over the Crimea and Eastern Ukraine go back to the times of Boris Yeltsin. Putin acted on those threats in 2003 trying to take over Ukraine’s Tuzla Island off the shores of the Crimea. The annexation of the Crimea in 2014 was explained by the threat from NATO, which allegedly planned to establish naval bases on the peninsula. In reality, it was a response to the Ukraine’s Revolution of Dignity and determination to sign an association agreement with the European Union. By launching a war on Ukraine, Russia was not stopping NATO, which had refused to admit the country back in 2008, but was precluding the ‘escape’ of a former imperial subject from Russia’s sphere of influence. — Serhii Plokhy
Trump’s contention that Ukraine’s hope of joining NATO ‘caused the war to start’ is a claim that is often made, but one that doesn’t stand up to scrutiny. Given that there was no serious prospect of Ukraine joining NATO between 2008 and 2022, it’s hard to see how Ukraine’s hope of joining NATO at some point in the future caused the full-scale Russian invasion in February 2022. Nothing had happened in the previous 14 years to make it likely that Ukraine could join NATO anytime soon. I think most specialists on Russia and Ukraine agree that Putin’s key motive for the full-scale invasion was his desire to restore Russian political control over Ukraine—it wasn’t about this or that piece of territory. This reflects Putin’s oft-stated belief that Ukraine is not a separate nation and that it is an artificial state. Putin was motivated by imperial ideas about Ukraine, not by any fears of a security threat to Russia from NATO. It’s worth noting that Russia has literally thousands of nuclear weapons to deter an attack on Russian territory. It’s also worth noting that Putin seems untroubled by Finland joining NATO in 2023, even though they share a lengthy land border. In fact, Russia has moved troops away from the Finnish border to fight in Ukraine. — Brian Taylor
Putin hasn’t taken Ukraine because he can’t. To suggest ‘not taking all of Ukraine’ is a Russian concession is ludicrous. — Mick Ryan
The front line is not about to collapse. Despite AFU [Armed Forces of Ukraine] being largely pressed out of Kursk, the overall situation from Pokrovsk to Kupyansk improved. The implication being that Ukraine is not in a desperate situation requiring a rushed ceasefire under unfavorable terms. — Michael Kofman
Drones have indeed transformed the battlefield in Ukraine by providing accessible and affordable capabilities at a scale that did not previously exist. They are making it difficult to concentrate forces, achieve surprise and conduct offensive operations. — Stacie Pettyjohn
Following last night’s brutal assault on Kyiv, it’s clear Putin has no interest in peace. Time to answer Russia’s ongoing invasion in Ukraine with renewed American strength and give our ally the military support they need to win a victory for freedom.USUA https://abcnews.go.com/International/russia-launches-massive-deadly-strike-kyiv-ukrainian-authorities/story?id=121113739 — Mike Pence · Apr 24, 2025
Furthermore, I expect the [country's] legal profession to understand that the nation is not here for them but that they are here for the nation, that is, the world, which includes [our country], must not decline in order that formal law may live, but [our country] must live irrespective of the contradictions of formal justice. From now on, I shall intervene in these cases and remove from office those judges who evidently do not understand the demand of the hour. — source
Harvard is an Anti-Semitic, Far Left Institution, as are numerous others, with students being accepted from all over the World that want to rip our Country apart. The place is a Liberal mess, allowing a certain group of crazed lunatics to enter and exit the classroom and spew fake ANGER AND HATE. It is truly horrific! Now, since our filings began, they act like they are all “American Apple Pie.” Harvard is a threat to Democracy, with a lawyer, who represents me, who should therefore be forced to resign, immediately, or be fired. He’s not that good, anyway, and I hope that my very big and beautiful company, now run by my sons, gets rid of him ASAP! — Trump (verified) · Apr 24, 2025
As shown by our victims’ stories today, Biden’s Department of Justice abused and targeted peaceful Christians while ignoring violent, anti-Christian offenses. Thanks to President Trump, we have ended those abuses, and we will continue to work closely with every member of this Task Force to protect every American’s right to speak and worship freely. — Pamela Bondi · Apr 22, 2025
Will be a very difficult late summer and fall — ssu