Hmm... Worries have been raised that the fighter-bombers were shot down by arms supplied by the West... I suppose, had they been supplied by Moldova or Lithuania, then the Kremlin could conceivably come up with another pretext for threats/aggression (though it would be a...posttext).

The Russia Aerospace Forces (VKS) reportedly lost three Su-34 attack aircraft in southern Ukraine between December 21-22. The Ukrainian Air Force reported that Ukrainian forces downed three Su-24 aircraft on December 22 in the southern direction, and Russian milbloggers claimed that Ukrainian air defenses downed the Russian aircraft in the Kherson direction near Krynky.[8] Russian milbloggers responded to the isolated incident with great concern about Ukraine’s air defense capabilities in southern Ukraine.[9] The VKS previously lost two Mi-8 helicopters, a Su-34 bomber, and a Su-35 fighter during an incident in Bryansk Oblast on May 13, 2023, which Russian forces similarly seized on to voice anxiety over Ukrainian air defense capabilities.[10]

[8]
https://www.facebook.com/GeneralStaff.ua/posts/pfbid09rfymGKjCXTxFQfY6whVqgpENGj9v1vpoQ96E7Jdj3TSDHtreps6abFAavdZNKpAl
https://t.me/MykolaOleshchuk/168
https://t.me/SJTF_Odes/4255
https://t.me/rybar/55255
https://t.me/notes_veterans/14411
https://t.me/milinfolive/112984
https://t.me/vysokygovorit/13928
https://t.me/NeoficialniyBeZsonoV/31769

[9]
https://t.me/milinfolive/112984
https://t.me/voenkorKotenok/52885
https://t.me/grey_zone/21718
https://t.me/notes_veterans/14411
https://t.me/rybar/55255
https://t.me/vysokygovorit/13928
https://t.me/NeoficialniyBeZsonoV/31769

[10]
https://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-may-13-2023
https://www.rferl.org/a/russia-jets-helicopters-downed/32410378.html
— Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment: December 22, 2023 · Institute for the Study of War · Dec 22, 2023

Kyiv might have declared a no-fly zone in Ukrainian airspace [...] (Dec 10, 2023)

, toss the occasional envy in there for good measure. ;) But there are political and cultural problems, lots in need of improvements and attention. Fascista-Nazista creep just ain't the answer. (unless you want to leave it to me of course)

Anyway, problem-identification is one thing, I'm less optimistic about avoiding the known pitfalls. Pointing them out doesn't seem to have done much. :shrug:

Orbán has Trump's back.

'Evil is eating away at Western democracies,' says Hungarian PM Orban
^{— Euronews + Agence France Presse · Dec 21, 2023}

Such easy things to point out (especially when skipping the larger contexts), but, hey, maybe he's right. How would he characterize the Kremlin, then? (In public, no holding back, preferably?)

What sentiments are there here...?

• irrelevant, there's no climate change
• there's climate change, and it has nothing to do with humans
• there's climate change, and it won't affect humans
• there's anthropogenic climate change, and nothing can done
• whatever the case, risk assessments are required before anything else (best-case, worst-case)
• there's climate change, and we know too little, need more conclusive research before anything else
• there's climate change, and whatever can be done should be done for the sake of future humans
• a far-reaching revolution is required immediately to deal with climate change
• mankind is doomed, deal with it, and go on about your business
• climate scientists/activists = grifters

Something else or some combination?

It's too easy/cheap to point at some isolated thing or peddle/suggest conspiracy theories. I'm fairly sure some of those sentiments above can be binned, and others not so much.

^{Related: human "footprints" all over (roads, cities, farms, factories, wars, waste), impressive (post-)industrialization fossil burnage, pollution all over the place, population growth, anthropogenic resource deprivation, biodiversity impairment, extinctions, nature/wildlife displacement, deforestation, renewability, ...}

Well, another element of the climate grift was how they chose a child, Greta, as their spokesperson. That's a pretty classic example of grift. — Tzeentch

Besides, children don't make things believable. Only a fool would listen to a child on a topic like this. The choice of a child was deliberate, because people don't like to criticize children. And grifters don't like criticism. — Tzeentch

Yes, "they" ("them", "the secret behind-the-scenes conspirators") deliberately chose her while "hiding in the shadows", due to their "ulterior motives". :D A vast conspiracy, at that. The ↑ comments are just another example of ad hominem in service of incorrigible faith.

EDIT: apparently forgot one above: • climate scientists/activists = grifters

the Great Patriotic War — ssu

A mad time + place. The Great Purge preceded the Great Patriotic War. Incidentally, invading Nazis found mass graves from the genocidal activities of Stalin's NKVD (isn't often brought up, was after all used as propaganda by the Nazis). Not exactly the kinds of things we want to see again.

, if anything like that, the Kremlin pushed Finland towards NATO, that just doesn't sound as nice/imposing/strong in terms of Kremlin propaganda.

A century or so ago saw idiotic authoritarianism emerge in several places.

Mussolini, to be called Il Duce by his followers, kick-started his fascist thing in Italy, 1919, with Bianchi. In 1921 he turned it into his National Fascist Party, and from 1922 he turned Italy authoritarian, one step at a time. In a typical strong-man gesture, Italy rolled into Ethiopia in 1935.

Not much says ruthless authoritarian like Stalin, who held the Soviet Union (+ Russia) in a murderous iron grip from 1924 to 1953. Some of the European fascists declared themselves anti-communist and acquired followers that way, authoritarianism against authoritarianism.

Hitler, Der Führer, learned from Mussolini's fascism, and went on to do his Nazi thing. He took over Germany in 1933 and initiated the 2nd world war in 1939. Some methods that were systematized (+ "industrialized") by the Nazis have found employ to this day (state-governed directed indoctrination and propaganda, what-have-you).

Dollfuss took on power in Austria in 1932. A milder authoritarianism that didn't get along with the Nazis, who murdered him in 1934 and took over Austria in 1938.

Salazar ruled Portugal from 1932 to 1968. A relatively mild authoritarianism.

General Franco, Caudillo, dictator'ed Spain from 1939 to 1975 after The Spanish Civil War. A good buddy of Hitler's and Mussolini's.

In South America, Argentina had a string of authoritarian rule during the period, Uriburu (1930), Justo (1932), Ortiz (1938), Castillo (1942).

France and the UK also had idiotic movements around the time (just took some political disillusion), that fortunately didn't quite catch on (some other European nations were less infected). Similarly, North America saw The German American Bund (Nazism) and The Black Legion.

The influence of some of these fizzled down with the end of the 2nd world war, though quite not all.

Roughly a century later, the creepshow seems to be rearing its head again, as if there was no history to learn from. Anything familiar? Other parallels, anyone? Can't accept ongoing democracy, responsible freedom, transparency, humanitarian values, separation of religion and politics, whatever? Disillusioned? Just leave the ruling to me.

Russia boosts nuclear forces amid ‘hybrid war’ with the West: Putin
^{— Al Jazeera · Dec 19, 2023}

In Ukraine, those who are aggressive towards Russia, and in Europe and in the United States – do they want to negotiate? Let them. But we will do it based on our national interests. We will not give up what is ours. — Pukin

The article summarizes some of what's come out of the Kremlin lately. Threats (still) extend to a couple or three continents altogether; Moldova and Finland have received a bit more of that lately; their Ukraine objective apparently extends to, well, Ukraine. There doesn't seem to be much to come after.

Sanctions can be a way to express (for some at least) ...
• "We're not going to help, or partake in, what you're doing"
• "You won't benefit in any way from us while doing that, expect counter-measures"
• "We won't make it any easier for you to continue doing that"
• "Our depreciation is serious, and we won't be complicit or contribute"
Something along those lines. Expressed by action, not just statements (e.g. the UN).

Did the Kremlin move Russia into a wartime economy over Ukraine...? (Due to miscalculation?) What reactions do they expect from this stuff?

And who the heck is Igor Salikov anyway? If he is who/what he claims, I'd recommend carrying a Geiger counter and staying within walking distance of a hospital. Stay off balconies, too.

I'm not quite sold on modal metaphysics, at least not as distinct.
There are incompatible metaphysics that each are unverifiable and unfalsifiable.
Metaphysics could be who-knows-what, just not contradictory, so that's the logic part.
Are all such metaphysics possible, then?
By Chalmers, logical = metaphysical; by Shoemaker, metaphysical = physical.
Anyway, examples would help.

Depraved clown. What does that make his voters?

Trump tells rally immigrants are ‘poisoning the blood of our country’
^{— Chris Michael · The Guardian · Dec 16, 2023}

At least someone has a spine and calls him out.

Trump’s rhetoric in final campaign sprint goes to new dark extremes
^{— Zachary B Wolf, Ariel Edwards-Levy · CNN · Dec 18, 2023}

Ukrainians may have a not-so-merry Christmas this year:

Analysis: Ukraine has had a terrible week. Blame the US and the EU
^{— Nick Paton Walsh · CNN · Dec 17, 2023}

Some got caught up in traffic jam:

Third Ukrainian truck driver dies in Poland border blockades-TV
^{— Ron Popeski, Alistair Bell · Reuters · Dec 16, 2023}

Cold war at least, well err + some hot spots:

In Russia, All Policy Roads Lead to the War
^{— Alexander Gabuev · WSJ · Dec 8, 2023}

According to multiple sources, Dec 17, 2023:

Finland was taken and dragged into NATO. What did we have, some kind of dispute with Finland? All disputes, including those of a territorial nature in the middle of the 20th century, were all resolved a long time ago. We had the best, most heartfelt relations. Economically, everything was developing. Yes, in the timber industry, there were some problems linked to the necessity to develop timber processing within the country. But that was all. Just a small detail in reality. There weren't any problems, but now there will be. Because we've now been forced to create a Leningrad military district and concentrate a certain number of military units there. Why do they need that? It's just nonsense. The same goes for other countries, including NATO countries. With whom did we have problems? Nobody. They're the ones who are artificially creating problems with us. Because they don't want such a competitor as Russia. — Putin

Starting false here (nope, Finland chose, Sweden chose, Ukraine chose) again exemplifies the alternate world type stuff. Conclusion(s) kind of fizzle out (ex falso quodlibet). Seems doubtful that the Kremlin circle could have missed / not understood (i.e. mala fides), but maybe they do need a wake-up call? The UN (and the good baker Jones of upper Negombo, Sri Lanka) have repeatedly clarified, and, yes, their claims/side have been considered. Unless/until called out, they can continue their moves and threats and story-telling. Ought a (diplomatic) dialogue address these issues?

False and fabricated intel promoted by the people in the White House themselves, yes. — ssu

If nothing else, at least the story hasn't been "disappeared" / suppressed.

Opinion: ‘At my first meeting with Saddam Hussein, within 30 seconds, he knew two things about me,’ says FBI interrogator
^{— Peter Bergen interviews George Piro · CNN · Mar 21, 2023}

Investigated all the way down to Curveball's involvement, and fairly consistently and openly criticized, including by Americans — a scandal/travesty and lesson learned that might not quite have seen the light of day elsewhere. Something similar will happen again though, whether the US or someone else.

Ough :/

Microplastic pollution rained down on Canada during a hurricane
^{— Carolyn Wilke · New Scientist · Dec 7, 2023}
It's raining microplastics: Hurricane Larry dropped plastic particles all over N.L.
^{— Jean-Benoit Legault · Toronto Star · Dec 16, 2023}

'I Didn’t Change My Number': Macron Still Open To Dialogue With Putin If It Helps To Bring Peace
^{— Samuel Petrequin · AP · Dec 15, 2023}

At some point the French president stopped the relationship with us. We didn’t do it, I didn’t. He did. If there’s interest, we’re ready. If not, we’ll cope. — Putin

I didn’t start the war unilaterally, breaking the treaties I’d agreed to. And it wasn’t France that decided to commit war crimes in the north of Ukraine, making discussions virtually impossible. Well, we have to be serious, so I have a very simple position. I haven’t changed my number. If President Putin has a willingness to engage in dialogue and serious proposals to move forward and emerge from the conflict and build a lasting peace, that is to say one that respects international law and therefore Ukrainian interests and sovereignty, I’ll take the call. — Macron

How to negotiate with alternate world type stuff? The Kremlin has demands masquerading as proposals.


Oryx have investigated equipment losses (ongoing) — Russian, Ukrainian — which seems rather comprehensive, Russian in particular. Personnel losses are reportedly rather comprehensive as well, in line with the amount of explosives burned.

U.S. intelligence assesses Ukraine war has cost Russia 315,000 casualties -source (yahoo)
^{— Jonathan Landay, Guy Faulconbridge, Daniel Wallis, Bill Berkrot, Jonathan Oatis · Reuters · Dec 12, 2023}
Russia Has Lost Almost 90% of Its Prewar Army, U.S. Intelligence Says (msn)
^{— Warren P Strobel, Matthew Luxmoore · WSJ · Dec 12, 2023}

The numbers are a noticeable fraction of invasion forces and available resources, unlike Crimea 2014. The Kremlin may not care much about humans (though they keep speaking of "Ukrainian sacrifices"); did they anticipate those numbers though? What do they anticipate for them to "cleanse" Ukraine? (in Kremlin-speak, "Nazi" ≈ non-irredentist + having chosen not-Kremlin, or whatever, which may or may not include Nazis)

, Iraq was based on false/fabricated intel and later turned into a disaster. (also Nov 14, 2023) If not much else, at least Saddam Hussein's wretched rule ended. I think Afghanistan is different, though. Not so much due to the US rationale to catch Osama bin Laden (and end Al-Qaeda), but due to the takeover by extremist, anti-humanitarian Taliban (also 2001), whose wretched effects we can see today (even if overshadowed by Israel-Hamas, Russia-Ukraine). But that's more of a reason not to abandon Afghanistan. Where's the UN?

But when one believes in the existence of the world, but says there is no justified belief in the world when not perceiving it. What would you class the position? — Corvus

Justified yes (evidential), proven no (purely deductive). ← different

↪Corvus, it's safer to think that what you won't know can still kill you.
But hey, you won't find any purely deductive disproof of solipsism either. — Nov 25, 2023

Hence, we try to seek justification on our beliefs and perception.
But point here is, can belief be justified properly? Belief is a psychological state, which cannot be justified rationally in nature.

Or are some beliefs also epistemic when justified? But if it cannot be justified, then it can't be. How do we justify our beliefs rationally? — Corvus

By "properly" do you mean deductively, with logical certainty?

Metaphysics that have survived (this far, sort of, in corners of academia at least), are just that. For some proposition, p, if attainable evidence is compatible with both p and ¬p, then we strand there. And we're venturing into metaphysics. Not particularly informative, like a difference that makes no difference (though Bateson used that phrase differently).

So, taken together, pragmatic safety, those novelties, our errors, annoying constraints, our agreements, stuff like that (taken together), give us anti-idealism if you will. But not as a matter of mere deduction. Observations, evidence, experiences, linguistic practices, life, and rationality too. Ethics involve an extra-self world as well.

Besides, there are some pitfalls in thinking that axiomatic logic can derive particulars of the real world by itself (logicing). Such logic is non-ampliative, derives what's contained in axioms, however complex to prove, and that's it. Hence it can be extended with modal logic. Knowledge of the real world needs the real world to stand on, if you will.

Have a good weekend. Grabbing a JD#7 on the rocks.

they didn't anticipate the Ukrainian response — ssu

That would be my guess as well, though there are some (ambiguous) signs...
"others are out to destroy Russia"
tightening domestic control + nationalist propaganda/indoctrination
"new world order" (the multipolar thing)
nuclear armament + posturing
foreign destabilization efforts
threats + polemics
cold war trajectory

Incidentally just scrolled by:

Comparison of mild physiological effects of surgical masks and N95 respirators over 60 min at rest
^{— Valerie C Cates, Anthony L Marullo, et al · Mount Royal University · Jul 5, 2023}

According to this research, masking up has inconsequential negative effects.

There's a fair roundup over here, though the latest may not have made it in:
▸ Pfizer–BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine (Wikipedia)
Collaboration, mRNA/protein technology, etc.

FYI, for a simple overview, I think this will do:

the Russian wartime economy is getting to it's feet — ssu

Warring was what they had planned all along, or Ukraine turned out tougher than they anticipated, or ...?

One has to wonder, why does this State of Nature seem to work on such a grand scale, and with such non-entities, but is refused on the smaller scale and with real, living, flesh-and-blood human beings? — NOS4A2

Because a group is more powerful than any of its individuals alone?
No individual alone could put a satellite into orbit, end the Holocaust, create or maintain all that's required for this forum to function as it does, ...
It seems that whatever groups (be they states or corporations or whatever) emerge sort of naturally?
I guess an individual's expected actions, as part of a group, can be partially pre/proscribed and/or constrained, and if they're born into a group...
(Apologies if you had something else in mind.)

Will Putin beat Stalin?



Catherine the Great ruled for 34 years.

In a TV Q&A (of sorts) on Dec 14, 2023 with Pukin (NBC, AP, Reuters), Mikhail Khodorkovsky noticed some unanswered Qs:

“Why does your reality differ from ours?”

“Mr President, when will real Russia stop being different from the one on TV?”
“Hello, how can I move to the Russia they talk about on Channel One?”

“For how long will you keep manipulating the percentage of inflation?”

Alternate world type stuff. Observed a few times in the thread prior. Apparently also observed by some Russians.

Quickly thrown together (some of those on the left are related):


The derogatory "Putler" was allegedly coined in Russia and/or Ukraine. Might have been motivated by something like the above taken together. Anyway, evidence for the above can be found throughout the thread. Haven't compared with Imperial Japan or Fascist Italy.

Hyper-critique could be down to finding a single fault + subsequent complete dismissal, not in logic/mathematics, but more social/human matters. Normalization of hyper-critique is a part of what I had in mind. Some trends and thoughts that might be related to what I'm thinking of (with the requisite name-dropping) ...

• science (Popper (1930s)) → methodical falsification attempts
• suspicion (Ricœur (1960s)) → onwards to radical suspicion
• cynicism (Sloterdijk (1980s), Žižek (1980s)) → knowing and not caring
• bullshit (Frankfurt (1980s)) → not caring
• postcritique (Sedgwick (1990s)) → reparation of paranoia
• distrust (Latour (2000s)) → on to radical distrust

So, post-truth, the Trump, pandemic reactions, Evangelism resenters demagogues onboard for the ride, UFOs, mind-control, ...? Examples can be found here on the forums, too. Say, where does "being reasonable" fit in? (in a colloquial sense, with a nod towards ethics)

Thank'ye @unenlightened. :)

Why are you so quick to defend big pharma. Does your grandmother receive her pension from them? — Merkwurdichliebe

Who said I am? Just pointing the childish generalization at itself. :D

None of it should be trusted. Not big pharma, not government, not mass media, not the church, &c, &c. — Merkwurdichliebe

Maybe neither should ↑ this

FYI

Fitch anticipates the war will continue throughout 2024 within its current broad parameters. In our view, Ukraine still has some strategic military advantage, underpinned by strong resolve and Western military support, but its counteroffensive has made limited gains so far, and in our central scenario there is insufficient superiority to decisively deliver objectives.

We also consider there is an absence of politically credible concessions that could result in a negotiated end to the war, potentially leading to a very protracted conflict. Over a longer horizon, we anticipate some form of settlement, but view a 'frozen conflict' as more likely than a sustainable peace deal, at least for a significant period.
— Fitch Affirms Ukraine at 'CC' · Fitch Ratings · Dec 8, 2023

Anyone interested in what Russian propaganda looks like can check Ural Daily (Dec 10, 2023). Not sure of the intended audience.

Helping another nation exercise their right to self-defense is only rational if it has a chance of succeeding. There is no such chance in the case of the Ukraine war, and thus Europe should not contribute to the illusion that Ukraine can win this war. — Tzeentch

Really? :D The Kremlin fears a few scenarios (hence their saber-rattling), scenarios that Ukraine + allies haven't done. Taking over the Ukrainian skies is one that's come up in the thread. Unless some such move is implemented, the Kremlin likely will (and can) keep pushing it. :shrug:

A gigantic new ICBM will take US nuclear missiles out of the Cold War-era but add 21st-century risks
^{— Tara Copp · AP · Dec 10, 2023}

So, Kremlin saber-rattling has swiftly brought on a new cold war? They've already spoken of arms race and such, plus their going-and-doings point in that direction.

Nuclear posturing of late has been Russian and North Korean. The Kremlin appears to be going for a Cold War II. Incidentally, the kind of environment Putin was trained in, grew up in, knows, where he made some buddies. — Nov 20, 2023

It's a choice they can make, it's not like others can make (or skip) it for them, though, once made, it impacts others. That is, you can't choose not to be affected, or not to play, only how to.


Since the Ukrainian skies have come up again (hi ), a fairly straightforward observation regarding do'ers and the rest:

Kyiv might have declared a no-fly zone in Ukrainian airspace (apart from approved flights), and that hostilities taken against them will be taken out (regardless of location, "so please keep your distance"). Within their mandate, in part at least; might have been expected or recommended by some strategists. Others, like the USAF, JASDF, RAF, whoever, might have helped implement that. (By the way, no commercial flights since Feb 2022 thanks to the Kremlin.)

Maybe the capable should start seriously talking about implementing a no-fly zone in Ukrainian airspace, iff the Ukrainian government wishes it.

Sending F-16s to Ukraine in fight against Russia would take 'months and months': Blinken
^{— Tal Axelrod · ABC · Jul 23, 2023}
A Russian fighter jet fired flares at a US drone over Syria and damaged it, the US military says
^{— Lolita C Baldor, Tara Copp · AP · Jul 25, 2023}

Then (if their government says so), any missiles violating that, warrants taking out the source of launch. Much like whatever other nation, here implemented by whatever coalition agreeing to help Ukraine. Once the Ukrainian skies are better cleared of offenders, civilians will be safer, the situation different, and more assessments warranted. That is, no tiptoeing inside Ukrainian airspace [...] — Jul 24, 2023

Didn't happen. Instead something else, analogous happened ...

• Russia threatens military strikes on Western countries if Ukraine's newly-donated F-16s are based in NATO territory
  ^{— Will Stewart · Daily Mail · Dec 8, 2023}

See that? The central difference being that we're talking Ukraine, not Russia or Malaysia or ... (There's something...ridiculous about this...)

There are some lessons learned here. Initiative and resolve, discussions debates bureaucracy slowness (some of which is merited, mind you), indecision becoming the decision, strategy, concessions, ... Meanwhile, the authoritarian Kremlin rolls on.

:D There's something funny about this:

Russia’s Latest Disinformation Tactic Exploits American Celebrities
^{— Steven Lee Myers · The New York Times · Dec 7, 2023}
Russian propagandists exploited celebrity Cameo videos to spread disinformation, Microsoft says
^{— Catherine Thorbecke · CNN · Dec 7, 2023}

Making fun using Elijah Wood, Mike Tyson, Priscilla Presley, Kate Flannery, Shavo Odadjian, John McGinley, Dean Norris, ... I'm not sure the (original) intent was comedy, though.

Russian influence and cyber operations adapt for long haul and exploit war fatigue
^{— Clint Watts · Microsoft Threat Analysis Center · Dec 7, 2023}
Russian FSB cyber actor Star Blizzard continues worldwide spear-phishing campaigns
^{— UK National Cyber Security Centre · Dec 7, 2023}

, plus with some (typical) partners, the UK, France, Canada, Poland, Romania, whoever, a no-fly zone of sorts could have been imposed and maintained effectively.
Don't know if the UN would have a majority vote to impose a no-fly zone, but I suppose it's conceivable.

If one does not believe an external world exists, then one is a solipsist, right?
Or, if one is not a solipsist, then one believes an external world exists (contraposition).
For the hyper-skeptic, only the existence of a variety of thoughts is certain, whatever they all may be.

Some indications:
We sometimes discover new things; things previously unknown, unthought, unexperienced, uninvented.
We're sometimes wrong about things; what, then, made us wrong, but whatever is indeed the case?
We can't do just anything, whether trying to "will" it so or not; extra-self imposed limitations.

Non-solipsists:
We agree on any number of things, a rather large number; when to be at work in the morning; where the local grocery store is; this is English; ...

↑ mostly adapted from earlier posts and other posters

[...] that underlying threat, which is the US. NATO is simply a vessel. — Tzeentch

The threat of democracy and non-oppression/freedom? :D It's a constant threat to authoritarianism (if anyone is willing to stand up), as it should be.

I guess formal law amendments can be done during wartime + martial law:

The Chairman of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine Ruslan Stefanchuk reported on the results of the plenary session on 8 December 2023
^{— Government of Ukraine (Verkhovna Rada) · Dec 8, 2023}

[...] It contains observations aimed at bringing some provisions in line with the European Convention on Human Rights of 1950, the Framework Convention for National Minorities of 1995, and the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages of 1992. — Daria Iulia Cotiuba

Welcoming the UA amendments to legislation relevant to national minorities in Ukraine - a positive step forward. RO will continue to promote a transparent and constructive approach on this matter. (Luminita Odobescu · Dec 8, 2023)

At some point, the Russian system inheritance could be transformed to modern democracy (shedding the shackles).

FYI, interview with Sergei Ryabkov:

“I don’t think that relations between Russia and NATO will be restored” (en)
^{— Semyon Boykov · Izvestia · Nov 29, 2023}

It's worthwhile keeping notice of what's omitted (I'm not intending to propagate Kremlin propaganda).


US and Sweden sign Defence Cooperation Agreement
^{— Simon Johnson, Dan Whitcomb, Christina Fincher, Jacqueline Wong · Reuters · Dec 6, 2023}

Sweden is a strong, capable defense partner that champions NATO’s values, and will further strengthen the Alliance once its NATO accession is completed. Sweden’s membership will strengthen our collective defense and enhance our ability to respond to security challenges in the Euro-Atlantic area. Sweden will be a net security provider from its first day in NATO, and the Alliance will be stronger with Sweden as a NATO Ally. — US Department of State

The Swedes didn't do so because they're a US puppet, they did so because Russia is a Kremlin puppet and the Kremlin ain't friendly.

, I'm guessing @NOS4A2 is just using the Trump circus to criticize democracy, well, ultimately any state/government. Kind of coincidental, in a way?

I guess people are used to Medvedev's ramblings by now...

3. Never since the Cuban Missile Crisis has the threat of a direct clash between Russia and NATO leading to the Third World War been so real.
[...]
And for this loot new rivers of blood will flow, for which the Biden family and all their Bandera bastard are responsible. — Dmitry Medvedev · Dec 8, 2023

Oddly enough, (threats of) nuclear world war by and large only come out of the Kremlin circle (and North Korea) these days. Or maybe it's not that odd, just more of the planned posturing.

Ex-president clowns: Do Trump or Medvedev ramble the most? :D

The Kremlin has deployed convicted cannibal Denis Gorin, serial killer Nikolai Ogolobyak, and other suchlike to Ukraine. "Watch out, Ukrainians!" (Not "shoe found in tiger's mouth", but in cannibal's mouth.) Seems odd if those convicts were to walk the streets of Moscow once/if released from military duty.

What's different between what we want to reconcile?
(mind and world, perception and the perceived, etc)

For one, introspective (self-referential) versus extrospective (extra-self, other).
When mind tries to understand itself, wouldn't we expect some sort of cognitive horizon or limit?