Comments

  • Random Sexual Deviancy
    Is this the thread for horny and slightly balding single men?Heister Eggcart
    Why only slightly balding? >:O
  • Random Sexual Deviancy
    @Heister Eggcart I invite you to join this room, I think this is perfect for you!

    @Baden's sleep program seems to have failed as well, so he seems to be back too!

    I think you two can get a night club act started in here!
  • Is sex as idolized elsewhere as in the West?
    Ah, that's how the shit that sometimes appears in my place is called >:O
  • Is sex as idolized elsewhere as in the West?
    That's far worse, then she will be cold too! That's a disaster!
  • Is sex as idolized elsewhere as in the West?
    It's going to be cold on the floor... :(
  • Is sex as idolized elsewhere as in the West?
    I said find, not find her and sit on her.Heister Eggcart
    So where do I sit once I find her? :-O
  • Is sex as idolized elsewhere as in the West?
    Sit down in my lady's lap? Isn't that supposed to be kind of the other way around mate?
  • "Comfortable Pessimism"
    You may be interested in this essay:
    http://people.uncw.edu/kozloffm/glubb.pdf

    You can have a look at the summary at the very end if you want it in short form.
  • "Comfortable Pessimism"
    So your sweeping claim is yet to be empirically tested.apokrisis
    :-} To say it is yet to be empirically tested is to misunderstand it. It cannot be empirically tested, because every new society that comes up will still be puffed up by this self-belief and this delusion that it really is different than all those that went before it. All it takes is one sufficiently bad leader/administration and things will be over - for any civilisation.

    Technology is a tool for amplifying human action.apokrisis
    Right - so if human beings statistically have a tendency towards immorality, that means that given technology, their immorality will have much greater consequences now than ever before, because it too will be amplified. This pretty much suggests that we're going to end all of human civilisation in nuclear war.

    I know it is your thing to play the conservative. But again, I have outlined the grounds on which I am founding a view. It is the one supported by science and philosophical naturalism. So just repeating your own paradigmatic assumptions in reply is otiose.apokrisis
    I'm not against naturalism - I fail to see how naturalism would fail to note the inability to alter man's character, and if man's character is a large driving factor for his actions, and man is naturally predisposed or has a tendency towards immorality, and technology amplifies man's actions, it kind of only follows that things are going to get worse quite quickly.

    Anthropological bollocks. It over-ran its ability to control an empire. It ran out of new grain fields to occupy.

    So it had a brilliant social formula - for its time. But then fell apart because it over-ran what its hierarchical organisation could contain.

    So it arose on things like speed of communication, coherence of action. And fell apart after the social technologies involved could no longer cope with the scale of the task.
    apokrisis
    Not only this. If you read accounts of the fall of Rome from historical sources you will see a multitude of factors among which loss of discipline, and loss of motivation which permitted them to be defeat by barbarians.

    But you are arguing from your own personal vague definitions of intellect and morality. As a naturalist, I aim higher. If nature is in fact intelligible, these are things we can properly define and measure. They are not just matters of opinion.apokrisis
    Sure, so?

    All earlier examples of social collapse (as evidenced for example by Jared Diamond) were societies that didn't understand their natural basis sufficiently.apokrisis
    If you're referring to Guns, Germs and Steel, I've read it and I'm not impressed. My reading of history shows that these weren't the main factors. The main factors were always social - in the evolving social mentalities. Baghdad at the height of the Islamic golden age lost its virtues - people became like today - many academics, many scientists, lots of musicians, a flowering and promiscuous culture, loss of motivation amongst the youth, a very extensive compassion, an anti-military hippie kinda culture etc. Then it collapsed.
  • Is sex as idolized elsewhere as in the West?
    I'd definitely say that the West is obsessed with sexuality more than just sex.Heister Eggcart
    *nods* (Y)
  • "Comfortable Pessimism"
    No, the pessimist merely acknowledges this, because he also knows that complaining about what cannot be changed is a foolish waste of time.Thorongil
    Hmm then what about all the talk of "it would be better if there was no suffering"? The pessimist is still engaged in thinking how things could have been better, how they could have been different - instead of being engaged with the world as it is.
  • "Comfortable Pessimism"
    There is the long-run issue to. But a "perfect" society - that understood itself in these organismic terms - would understand such lifecycle issues and thus know how to guard against it.apokrisis
    The point I'm making is that understanding such lifecycles does not help prevent them at all. Human nature (or human folly) if you want is such that the said society, will at one point, not act according to such an understanding. It's already starting not to in fact. You think technology can overstep man's morality. But it can't. Technology is of no use in such matters because it cannot alter the CHARACTER of human beings. Too much good and people lose motivation. The Roman Empire didn't disappear because of natural disaster and pandemic - it disappeared due to internal reasons. Internally it became unstable. Why? Because of depravation and loss of moral values - loss of the virtues.

    I'm not saying it wouldn't be difficult. But in fact modern society does a pretty good job at planning for pandemics and climate resilience. It is exactly this kind of organic lifecycle thinking which is starting to be applied (if perhaps not nearly quick enough to actually save our particular neoliberal/globalised/fossil fuel based "utopia"). :)apokrisis
    Except that pandemics and the like aren't the biggest danger. The biggest danger is within man's own heart.

    So who could argue with a modern society that is producing ever smarter, fitter, better-looking and civilised folk - on average?apokrisis
    I think people are actually more dumb than ever before on average. Sure, they have more knowledge than ever before, but certainly not more intelligence - too much comfort dulls down their intelligence, and all that is left is mere knowledge.
  • "Comfortable Pessimism"
    I think we're talking about something different - I'm talking about the fact that no society can be eternal - societies grow and die, and necessarily so. Why do they ultimately die? Because things are such that, statistically, in the long-run things decay - or tend towards entropy in your language.

    Now you (the individual) can be a sage all your life. But the whole lot of mankind can never be sages - there's always a tendency towards what is low. You can build that perfect society - only that it too shall disappear.
  • "Comfortable Pessimism"
    The pessimist's response is that there is no "dealing with it," in the sense of solving it. Stop immanentizing the eschaton. There will not be, and more importantly, cannot be a utopia on this planet.Thorongil
    There is no dealing with it at a social level, I agree with that. No perfect society. But the pessimist takes a further step than saying just this. He complains about it - as if such a society should be possible but isn't.
  • "Comfortable Pessimism"
    It underlies the difference between the pessimist and the Stoic - the pessimist is like the person who asks why there are running noses in the first place. The Stoic is the one who deals with it. The Stoic doesn't take the underlying principles of any kind of society to be broken.
  • "Comfortable Pessimism"
    tl:dr version: folks are hypocrites.Terrapin Station
    >:O
  • Random Sexual Deviancy
    This is the random sexual deviancy thread, Agustino, and you are seriously missing the point here. The idea is to include in your post some form of random sexual deviancy otherwise you are in the wrong place and should bounce out of here on your presumably large and flexible dildo.Baden
    Yes now that I have expressed my disgust with this whole affair, I will be able to peacefully walk out the door, having done my duty, and let you guys be up to whatever you see fit without any further disturbances. I wish you good luck, and hope that you know what to do with it :P
  • Random Sexual Deviancy
    No more than if I took that smiley and shoved it up your arse. In other words, I'm sure you quite enjoy it, my lovely.Baden
    Don't think that we're all like you my friend ;)
  • Random Sexual Deviancy
    Oh I'm actually supposed to be hurt now? >:O
  • "Comfortable Pessimism"
    But think of the ridiculousness of your suggestion. The existence of charities at all begs the question of what underlying features of society, human nature, and the world are broken and corrupt enough that they necessitate their existence. If humans were capable of alleviating suffering through charity, then they would be capable of solving the problems that necessitate charity. But they are not and so you are chasing a fool's dream.Thorongil

    'But my nose is running!' What do you have hands for, idiot, if not to wipe it? 'But how is it right that there be running noses in the first place?' Instead of thinking up protests, wouldn't it be easier just to wipe your nose?

    What would have become of Hercules, do you think, if there had been no lion, hydra, stag or boar - and no savage criminals to rid the world of? What would he have done in the absence of such challenges? Obviously he would have just rolled over in bed and gone back to sleep. So by snoring his life away in luxury and comfort he never would have developed into the mighty Hercules

    [...]

    Now that you know all this, come and appreciate the resources you have, and when that is done, say, 'Bring on whatever difficulties you like Zeus; I have resources and a constitution that you gave me by means of which I can do myself credit whatever happens!'
    — Epictetus

    Some of them do, but if you look for scholars who do work on Nietzsche, then more often than not, they ignore Schopenhauer.Thorongil
    This is correct.

    I sleep on a pillow imported from the far east, with downy feathers and a silk cover. Some say the prince of Persia once rested his head upon its soft embrace.darthbarracuda
    It seems we have a millionaire in our midsts! :D
  • Random Sexual Deviancy
    Sorry to say it, but this is just disgusting.
  • Was Dylann Roof Guilty and Responsible?
    but can one be sane and still think it reasonable to kill a group of people in church so that a race war will commence?Bitter Crank
    Yes possibly one can see this as a way to take vengeance on the world for what their situation is. Have you never felt such a desire arising in you? Quite possibly you have, but the difference between you and him is that you realise that doing such would not actually change your situation, and the world isn't actually responsible. Your sense of compassion would probably also deter you.
  • Was Dylann Roof Guilty and Responsible?
    In my own opinion yes. Nothing can excuse such behaviour.

    "Instead you sit crying and complaining - some of you blind to your benefactor, and unable to acknowledge his existence; others assailing God with complaints and accusations from sheer meanness of spirit"
  • Is sex as idolized elsewhere as in the West?
    Then they are not stable. People who see that progress and stability are incompatible are different and few, and they are thought to be mad-men by everyone else.unenlightened
    There is no progress in terms of societies. It's the same cycle having played itself out through all of history, and which will play itself out through all of history. The reason for this is the fallen nature of man.

    Progress is restricted to technology. And all stability is temporary (though not logically temporary, it just happens in the world to be temporary because men are never, in masses, good). But it doesn't follow that because it is temporary it's not worth striving for, or that it is logically impossible to achieve it. Indeed the intelligent amongst us seek to progress towards stability, ever-aware of how effervescent the nature of stability can be, and how even their progress will one day most likely be undone. The journey up towards the peak is worth it, even if you will inevitably fall back down and have to climb up once again. As Camus would say, we must imagine such a person as happy.
  • Is sex as idolized elsewhere as in the West?
    First, I introduced the term 'patrilineal', and I used it in the conventional meaning rather than make up some nonsense. If you want to distort the language to suit your own prejudices then there is no possibility of communication.unenlightened
    Yes you did, but I have no beef with it. It's not about using language to talk about my own prejudicies, it's using it to talk about what's important (and let me remind you that you've associated those virtues with patrilineal societies as well, so I merely identified the important point and went on from there). If you care about the fact that man or woman has a more leading role in society than the other, or whatever other incoherency, that's your problem, and you can go on caring about it day in and day out. I don't. If you disagree that the virtues are necessary for a stable family environment/society, I would like to hear arguments, not quibbles about what words mean.

    And what is of importance is that you have zero basis for your declarations thereafter; as if other cultures have not been at least as stable and survived at least as long and flourished as well, with just as stable families.unenlightened
    No they haven't actually. You name me just one such society. Societies have thrived from social conservative values - the Middle East and India from arranged marriages for example, Europe from the virtue of chastity, and so forth. The only ones who thrived from other values are the savages.

    And I would point out that it is just this stable family focused sexually righteous society that has degenerated into the abomination that is modern liberalism. Now how did that happen?unenlightened
    How is that any different from the Rome of Musonius Rufus and Epictetus (who advocated chastity until marriage for example) degenerating and collapsing in its morals over time? How is it any different than the very religious Islamic caliphate started by Muhammad degenerating into the liberal Baghdad at the height of its powers? A time always comes when people no longer see the value of discipline and virtue, and think they can do without it. Their parents couldn't enjoy life because they were burdened by the virtues - at least they should enjoy life now! It's like an army - if the army is always winning, and they even forget that losing is possible, they lose sight of the value of discipline. They forget that they won in the first place because of discipline. So likewise these young people forget that virtue is actually what made enjoyment possible in the first place, and not happy with the amount of enjoyment possible, they want to extend it, and conclude that removing virtue is the way to do this, without understanding that virtue is what made it possible in the first place.

    Societies go through cycles. Growth and decay. That's all that's happening to modern Western society. People who see this and are different are few, and they are thought to be mad-men by everyone else. It's always been this way. There's nothing new under the sun.
  • Is sex as idolized elsewhere as in the West?
    That it happens to be currently so is certainly true, though savagery is by no means confined to undeveloped societies. But I would like to see some argument as to why it is so 'by essence'. You might take the following into account, taken from here.unenlightened
    First, when I refer to patrilineal societies it's not of the essence with regards to them that the male plays a more important social role than the female. For all I care, it could be the female inheriting the property. What is of importance is that certain virtues exist - monogamy, virginity, loyalty, faithfulness, chastity, control of the sexual impulse. These virtues permit the creation of relatively stable families, where the members work together for the achievement of higher, common goals, with the elimination of potential sources of inner conflict like jealousy, hatred, anger, etc. Families are necessary for building up a strong and healthy society which focuses on its survival and flourishing instead of merely on pleasure.

    To say that developed societies could be matrilineal is no worse an absurdity than to suppose that an army could exist without discipline.
  • Is sex as idolized elsewhere as in the West?
    Like the stars aligned to fulfill that desire without compromise, but still wasn't good enough for this romantic idealist. That's what you get for spending years reading about romance rather than doing it.Wosret
    I don't think it's your ideals that are at fault, but rather your expectations.

    Even with that, my warped by fiction, ridiculously unrealistic ideas about romance, and love proved to be too insane, and I messed that up too.Wosret
    Again it's not the ideas which were unrealistic, but the fact that your partner didn't share them. And it would be kinda silly to think you're the only crazy one out there - it's just that, probably like you yourself, the crazy girls are hard to find. But to this day they must be waiting for Wosret...

    You've determined that such and such a relationship would satisfy you. There's no problem in that, it's who you are. The problem is that you live in a world which, largely, doesn't share your ideals, and therefore you'll be hard-pressed to find people who do share them. But they're not impossible to find. Also material conditions are important to satisfy desires - you obviously must have enough money to be able to enjoy your time with a beloved.
  • Is sex as idolized elsewhere as in the West?
    Okay and? What's there to say about that, why is it that significant?

    Any developed society is by essence patrilineal in your definition, because such virtues are needed to build a robust, self-perpetuating and strong society. You'll pretty much only have savages which organise themselves in matrilineal ways.
  • Is sex as idolized elsewhere as in the West?
    they have started to answer the op's question about other societiesunenlightened
    I wouldn't even bother to call these 3 people tribes "societies". The only relevant link there was India, and trust me, if you speak with Indians you'll see that Indian society is largely very conservative.

    Other people have found out how the structure of society produces its valuesunenlightened
    So? This does nothing to settle the question which are the right values. If you're going to say something about that (matrilineal values are right) then i may have some beef with you, otherwise what you're saying is insignificant for me, and quite trivial.

    They may also have started to see how changes in the structure of western society in the last century have led to a current conflict between 'old fashioned' and 'modern' valueunenlightened
    No the conflict has always existed - just have a read about Cato the Elder for example, or Baghdad at the height of the Islamic caliphate.
  • Is sex as idolized elsewhere as in the West?
    :-* your passive aggressiveness leaves me unmoved Sir.

    The real fact is that your so called analysis tells us absolutely nothing. What have we found out? There are societies which have these set of values, and there are societies which have a different set of values. Big deal. What's analytic about that? I've been saying that for ages.
  • Is sex as idolized elsewhere as in the West?
    And guess what, unenlightened is against what he terms "patrilineal societies" and for "matriarchal societies" - as if matriarchal societies weren't equally constructs. The facts are that nobility, kingship, etc. are values - at least for some. And as I have said, this conflict will be never-ending as the two sides cannot live together. All that is left for us to do, is for all of us to head in the political arena and fight.
  • Hello!
    To "demonstrate the capacity to do it" for the surgeon cannot just be a portfolio of past successful operations, because the next operation is the one that could expose the gaping hole in his knowledge.jamalrob
    Yes, but then this would hold for the one having a degree as well. The thing is the degree doesn't actually help you that much. I have a degree in engineering but I learned very little about it in university and more by actually doing it. I guess I could've been an independent engineer from the very beginning, I would just have started out taking small works that I was certain I could manage and go from there, just like I started in programming. But the problem is, if I actually tried to be an independent engineer after university, I couldn't legally practice even if I took on, say, building someone's garage >:O
  • Hello!
    Many of us are, same for me. It's curious how high the number of self-taught is in this profession in comparison with other professions. In my ideal world, other professions would be like IT having a lot of self-taught and independent producers. I've always wondered why we have barriers for example against self-taught lawyers. It makes no sense to me, and I think this stratification of some professions such that you need a degree and need to be affiliated with such and such a body to practice is detrimental. Degree should be replaced with exams or some other means of testing the practitioners. For example, one should be able to practice medicine if they can demonstrate the capacity to do it, even if they don't hold a medicine degree.
  • Hello!
    When I became a developer I vowed I would never become one of those guys who complained to other developers about "the users", treating them as the enemy.jamalrob
    I'm not complaining, I'm laughing at them ;) :P fools are useful, definitely not enemies.

    Are you a developer by profession (as in are you educated in computer science with a degree) or self-taught?
  • Hello!
    But this design isn't bad. The nav menu sticks at the top all the time, the screen is what 960-1000px wide at max (the main screen where the posts/writting goes), and the simplicity makes all the info easy to navigate and get to. But the unlearned brutes will always protest if I may be permitted to speak like this, not meaning any insult to anyone :P

    Although I will grant you that just the look of this forum is incredibly easy to make. It's functionality though (the back-end) is a different story, that's quite hard.
  • Hello!
    But when people say they dislike a design it's now second-nature for me as a web developer to find out if there is anything of substance in the complaint so that I can see if I can do something about it, or if it's just people moaning about something unfamiliar or expressing their odd tastes.jamalrob
    As I work largely in programming nowadays (database creation and management mostly, but also things like web-design) I know that the user ALWAYS moans about the unfamiliar and requests changes, even if those changes actually make whatever the application happens to be worse >:O (I think they think that by requesting such changes they are keeping the designer "under control" or some weird thing). It's crazy how many substandard applications I've had to make because users just want it that way, and they don't care about the rules of programming or design. I've broken almost all the rules in database creation for some folks >:O but it's their database. If they want it that way, when they want to expand it and increase its functionality it's just going to cost more :D
  • Hello!
    I also miss the approval or disapproval ratings.Maw
    Why so? Philosophy isn't about what folks like, it's about what is true. Approval and disapproval ratings were misused and became popularity contests, hence why we voted against them here.