I wrote a long and muddled account of how I think the universe works and asked chatgpt to convert it into a concise and philosophical account. Not being able to talk about any one part without it making zero sense without the rest being already explained. Added to the my own ineptitudes at good descriptive writing and a reasonably basic vocabulary for these things. So you are right and so are the others. I accept that I'm not qualified to discuss these things in the circles where they are decided, and that is fair enough.

Thanks you for your kind words.

If we don't let people say what they wish, we won't know the terrible things they plan on doing or inciting other to do. We'd be living in the dark. Let everyone say what they want and treat those that say what isn't right be judged by the masses. It seems quite black and white to me.

If you can accept the entire universe began that way, with no explanation as to how, then I think it's probably wise to carry on with it. I can't accept it. I can't accept all the multiple fields that appeared from nowhere which supposedly all thing fluctuate within or black hole singularities or even space-time curvature. None of it makes sense to me, even though I accept that all the amazing mathematics that have been created to explain and predict, all work well and have pushed our technology forward. I have to let it go though. My idea of how things are just gets rejected or dismissed by anyone with enough understanding to know what I'm saying and it's ruining my mental health.

I don't know what you want. There are a thousand references from all areas of physics and cosmology. I'm defining how I think the mechanics of all these things work. I'm not refuting the data. I'm explaining what I think is actually happening. If you don't like it or think its wrong or stupid then that's fine. I'm grateful you even read it.

One thing I will say is; if you do consider every photon of light as a wave, and you count how many must be passing in every point in space, in justt one instance, the number is in the billions. If you consider the universe is any bigger than the observable then the number goes up exponentially. If you take the measurement over a miniscule fraction of time instead of one moment the number jumps again and if you increase the size to even the plank length then it goes up once more. I feel like that's enough action to create the entire fabric of space.

Light is quantised by matter, which is quantised by the density of the space its in. Matter and space are in relation to one another. If one dilated, so does the other, always giving the same fundamental measurements. Space gives space more space and together the two spaces take up less space. Unlike stuff or matter, two spaces share space and need less room.

The evidence is everywhere.

Being really good at copying. In a nutshell.

Wants are all life is.

Time is something that happens and it can be measured. but so is a hole.

Time dilation is where everything gets silly. You can't dilate a measurement. Space and matter are the things in question. Time does not dilate. It's absurd. Think about it.

You're a complicated collection of atoms mate. But the word is human.

So I can tell you how pointless this question is, without instantly forgetting why I thought that as I unread your post.

It wouldn't have an outside, if it was finite. The universe is all of it, whether finite or infinite.

Everything thats happened couldn't of happened, if everything that happened before didn't happen exactly as it did. Fate is just a word to refer to one specific things inevitable role. The future is set in stone but completely unpredictable. I think words like fate help is deal with being stripped of free will.

Physicists know how space, time and matter work together. They don't have an answer to what it is. General Relativity works but what the hell is spacetime? The Big Bang explains expansion but where did this crazy singularity come from?

I want to know what things are, not just how they work. But, to find out, you need to look deeply into physics. Then you get to the point of realising that the best answer physics has to what we are actually made of, the essence of matter and energy, is "stuff". Something.

In short, physics doesn't have the answers but you can't say a thing about any of it unless you are one, or you get attacked.

Maybe all the ex theists, having discarded their religious views are now all struggling with all sorts of new existential problems which used to be accepted under the blanket of having been simply created or carried out by God?

I believe the wave spreads out and where it converges and crosses the sensor, a single atom is excited, the wave carries on but some energy has exchanged. Wave with no collapse. Its just my idea, probably wrong but solves the riddle. If you can believe a wave of light can lose some part of its energy but carry on anyway.

Prediterminable. Just not by anything imaginable. We don't have free will but we do all have our very own mind, so it might as well be free will. I never felt like I had it in the first place.

I'm just excited by the possibility of something new and groundbreaking happening. Plus I saw Eric on Joe Rogan's pod cast talking about it and he seemed like he was being genuine. I guess I'll just see what happens.

I wasn't trying to be. I'm sorry if caused any unpset.

I got that.

Because physics is so progressive?

If 4 people push you evenly from each direction and one gets blocked or pushes less, you go toward them.

no. And I never mentioned curved space, so we're clear.

the earth is blocking more push than the moon because its bigger. So in open space you stay still as you're being pushed evenly from all directions.

pretty much.

I think expansion is created by all the stars in space pumping space into space. I think gravity is secondary to this, being a blocking effect from the oncoming push from space in all directions, so we fall toward the sun in a path of least resistance.

Complete speculation.

I suppose you're right.

No I understand the BBT. But it doesn't even try to explain where or how a universe creating singularity appeared in the first place. The main question the BBT presents. Also, there is no way yet of proving that bodies in space aren't actually just moving apart evenly, increasing the space, rather than assuming the space is expanding. It would look the same. I believe stars release space, space being composed of just radiation like light, which they generate by fusing matter. If all stars release space then space appears to expand. But if you'd prefer I believed a magical point in nowhere with enough heat and energy packed inside to spawn our universe just happened to happen, I say no thank you.

The other problem I have with it is the way physisists say "to ask what came before the big bang is a bad question", because time only exists once the ball is rolling. If nothing existed before this singularity, there would still be nothing now! It's a huge mess of a theory. Even Roger Penrose's idea on how it works is ridiculous and he's been trying to explain it for longer than I've been able to walk.

The CMB is the only good evidense for the Big Bang Theory. But I think it has a different cause. I don't know how or from where, but if its the only reason to believe something as invented and stupendous as the BB, I'd rather wait and see.

Finally, I think at least half the reason the BBT took off is because it fitted in so nicely with the bible. God spoke and shazam, a universe! Sounds like one and the same to me. Fiction.

You hear people say things like "is my red the same as your red?" but you don't so often here someone asking if their sense of the smell of a banana is the same as your sense of it. Or if you hear the sound the same way. Because vision is a slightly more, personal feeling, sense.

No. You can build a perfect coin flipper and if all the coins were perfect, no matter how hard you thought about it, they would all land 100% one way.

But why the big gap? That doesn't fit it being a joke paper right? That's the equivalent of explaining a joke, which always ends in nobody laughing.

I guess we wait for someone who gets it to comment. Unless it's purposefully ungettable?

Geometric unity.

You're right. But why waste my time, you have Google right? Besides, I'm asking if for those who already know. If someone doesn't then they need to Google it anyway as I've already stated I don't get it.

I just stopped believing in the big bang. It posses way more questions than it answers. It's a stupid idea.

Love is how much of yourself you share with the other person/subject. How much of you that's been invested and adopted into the other, and vice versa. We love children the most as they are copies of us from the start and become more like us over time. The longer you are close to someone, the more you love them, even when you don't like them very much.

Infatuation and romantic love is mostly chemical with the added simulation of dreaming about the Beautiful future you can imagine with this new person, who seems, just perfect for you. Until the brain stops drugging your perceptions and you see the person as they are, which is hopefully somewhere close to the amazing, ideal person, you thought they were.

It's that simple in my opinion.

If your "short book" is already low in content, my advice would be, don't bother writing a book.

Believing something you don't know.

Both ideas are rediculous. This is where my depression stems. People would rather think up unbelievable, unrealistic and scary realities than assume the few observations which led to them contradict their precious (incomplete) theories.

Surely you need only check the context in other words? So many English words are ambiguous until used in a sentence. You're just being picky.

Thought is what got us into the mess of religion. It created it. Stating one is more powerful than the other is meaningless. Also, if it was, we'd have vanquished these dogmas long ago.

What does it matter?