This is NOT philosophy.

Funny how the thread's subject gets diverted by jealousy, envy and forum cults.

Well, I may not prefer videos but it's ALL philosophy so for that reason you should continue.

"Just think with your dick and write it out quick. "
Beautiful.

Definition of absolute reality as defined by Merriam-webster.

Definition of absolute reality
1:   ultimate reality as it is in itself unaffected by the perception or knowledge of any finite being
 

"I easily understood it the first time I read it, so perhaps the insufficiency lies elsewhere."



Did you now? Glad you chimed in to help save your friend but your come-back was "insufficient", transparent in motive and lacking in any poetic juice.. Try again.

"Anything but a bastard"

Well thank you-that leaves me with an almost infinite choice of words. Allow me to browse but I must be perfectly honest. There are only a "limited"
range of words that I feel would do you justice.

Brief but enjoyable and I look forward to the next jab countered by a linquistical knockout.

"my good man (or lady)"

You can call me "sir" to compliment by masculinity. What shall I call you?

"its multiple origins make it comparatively rich."

Like I said.....a bastard.

I understand NOW. You should have written your response with a little more clarification; obviously it was insufficient in conveying context.

When you speak of "limitations" concerning a limited language then you weaken your own argument and your insults.

"This I know. I suspect..."
This seems heavily paradoxical philosophically. Either you "know" or you "suspect". Which is it?

Wikipedia :
"English is a West Germanic language that originated from Anglo-Frisian dialects brought to Britain in the 5th to 7th centuries AD by Germanic invaders and settlers from what is now northwest Germany, west Denmark and the Netherlands.
A significant influence on the shaping of Middle English came from contact with the North Germanic languages spoken by the Scandinavians who conquered and colonised parts of Britain during the 8th and 9th centuries; this contact led to much lexical borrowing and grammatical simplification."
"Another important influence came from the conquering Normans, who spoke a form of French called Old Norman, which in Britain developed into Anglo-Norman. "
"Who yo baby daddy?"

I don't have anything to do with this discussion. I didn't even read the banner. But to judge anyone against a bastard language called English is setting a pretty low bar. IMO

Hold the door open on your way in for those on the way out.

Its not about the ability of the filmmaker. Whether the filmmaker succeeded or did not succeed and whatever cinematic endeavors he was trying to achieve is totally disconnected from the fact that the viewer is having an experience; an experience that was real. He was experiencing being told the story and the viewer systemically processes information during the watching iif a movie just as he does anything else in his daily life. This experience of watching the movie is valid as an experience to be analyzed.
The receiver of information assumed certain things about the story, during the story and subsequently.
It seems as though a strongly manifested pattern is present on this forum and rebuttals elude all fundamentals of science and philosophy and physics.
Why is that? ADD of the pen?

Arent adjectives mostly "decorative"? Semantics is low-hanging fruit. But this not just a word jacked with an adjective for mere form; it's a term in science used often.

But you deleted completely the variable of absolute reality. Your analysis was perception driven and not equated with that constant varible.

I didn't realized that until I went to the commentary, but I immediately knew to challenge the data. This was a good exercise in fact-checking but I've taught myself to apply the rules of reason to everything; therefore strengthening my capability to filter effectively.
When Nancy P. was quoted, it just seemed somewhat fashioned.

Good discussion. I agree with the implication of the Opening Piece but www.dictionary.com clarifies a moron as an I.Q. between 50 - 69. Not sure if that is a credible source; not being sarcastic.
Also, the piece seemed somewhat partisan in giving examples.

I am humble.

I'll do niether. I'll just the law of economics take its coarse.

Great idea but that would be predicated with the willingness to take hits as a moderator/owner. Will take great humility to pull that off.

Really? Tell us more.

Not sure exactly what kind of advice you are looking for but if your goal is not monetary then consider a non profit status. You can raise the money through investors. You will have to have it tested in an independent lab. Or go on Shark Tank and get rich!
Good luck.

I disagree that he needs academic credentials to achieve the success of a new product. Obviously, there is proof of that in articles over the world.

QUESTION to the MODERATORS: Since I have arrested your attention
Can I ask if a statement is TRUE or FALSE? Is this lawful?

Interestingly interesting.as a subject.

Some what an interesting discussion on the rights of a citizen of the U.S. and the "interweb" which is a global property.

U.S. law sweetums, heavily protects the rights of the citizens over any other entity, so bringing up the law does not help your case.

No. Watch Leah Remini.

Whatever

Sap? Didn't know people still used that word. I've been called worse by better people sweety.

No. you will NOT control me. All you will do is REACT to what I do but NO ONE controls me sweety. I know that it SOUNDS good but you don't have any control of what I do. This is America sweety.

Please rewrite your question. It's hard to be understood.

Is this a Yes or No question?

I guess you feel pious trolling me? Its ok. I am humble but this type of philosophy has long been practiced.

How is it ironic?

What is so ironic about it? Im all ears.

So you doubt the fact that philosophy is subjective and speculative while religion is objective and participatory? YES or NO.