If logic has an inherent contradiction, and math is based on logic, than math is self refuting

Thusly because you went with them in trying to force a contradiction

Many if not all of you are deliberately not talking normally. I tried my best to type this on a weird wonky tablet

I couldn't have

The

Dude, if you have one group doing something and another doing something, they are doing something. I didn't know you'd play a game that's idiotic

It's not a logical paradox. It's language game that's cleared up when you COMBINE language with logic

BS

.

Your latest post is illogical. It has me have a "mad laugh" . I know what I need to know about logic. I have a full vision of it. Are you into math or just logic? Math is too tedious but I have a full vision of it too.

His name is James

If there was really a paradox here it would affect material reality. I originally stated the paradox accurately so it could be understood as language works.

I don't know why you guys don't talk like adults

No one shaves all and "only men" who do not shave themselves? Do you realize this would affect empirical reality of this idiot paradox were true?

Number 2 is wrong. The philosopher doesn't shave himself so he is in the set of those who shave all those who do not themselves. You tried to add another loop Srap but it's the same paradox, which I already solved and I don't know why you guys don't get it. I read your post very slowly, slowing my heart rate, and it's clear this paradox is making something at of nothing

You are primarily what everyone else sees (a body) but you are also thought, therefore reality is the union of the ideal and the material

Thomas Aquinas is asserted to be Aristotle's greatest interpreter. Despite, however, the fact that Aquinas treated his pituitary gland as a idol. When he got old and fat, and his glands dried up, the fog came in and he said all his writings were "straw" . The same word MU keeps using!!

Besides even Aristotle didn't believe a thing was identical to itself. Literally half of an object, in his eyes, is in constant flux. How is it even an object at that point. It can not be because the matter principle remains the same, because this is only half the identity. Be humble and admit I'm right MU. Your cover has been blown

Hegel does not make fundamental mistakes. It's a mistake to assert otherwise. As JerseyFlight said elsewhere, sometimes a contradiction has to switch up your mind in order to get out of rigidness of thought. At least that's how I understood him

Well Heidegger speaks of potentiality turning into actuality. Which would seem miraculous if potentiality was other than energy. Energy creates force out of nothing because motion causes time. That's my theory. I have at least one thread on it

Most people believe in the world. Few are solipsistic. Default is not always true

Romeo can have much certainty Juliet exists. I feel lots of people's emotions as strongly as I feel my own

There can be as little doubt in Juliets mind that Romeo exists than that she exists, maybe less doubt even

I didn't say I feel everyone's emotions.

No I feel their emotions. It's human

Well now I am wondering if only I exist. No, it makes no sense. I experience people are certainly as I experience myself. I cannot give you a syllogism though

I'm just saying that need a better word for the fundamentals of the world than information. We get.Information about things, which means we learn about objects

,

That's the idealist side of the coin. You can doubt that others exist, but you would be wrong. Enter the materialist side and behold there are bodies that arouse shame, love, and emotion in you

DNA is matter. Everything is matter, energy or thought. Information is what we learn. That is, it is our thoughts about matter energy and thoughts. Information can't exist as an object in the world. I don't mean to sound positivist, but this is a distortion of language

The true nature of reality is that we are not supposed to be here

Otherwise its too ambiguous to mean anything

It still seems to me if he shaves those, even everyone, who does not shave themselves, then he couldn't shave himself

Maybe the soul is nothingness

Information is completely mental

Ye, I concede that. He uses the word "ecstacy" to add excitement to the book and because it makes what he says sound more profound. He even used the word rapture as a synonym in my translation

Christians have long wondered how original sin can get on the soul since God is supposed to create each soul new. Anyway, I remember Alan Watts saying that it was attributed to the Buddha that he said we.must take responsibility for even our own births. A lot of protestant Christians believe all sins are equal. So being born would be as bad as whipping Jesus for them.

Two sides of one coin

I don't believe information is a thing anymore than prime matter is. I believe in materialism and idealism

Presence= aura, air, ambience, spirit, feeling, feel, flavor, vibe, scent

I've always felt that Christians equivocate when asked if God is male or female. The question is simple. Does it have a male or female presence. Would theists be open to the idea that God is entirely female?

That story merely reminds us of birth. Missing out on the "free of life" makes us want to return to the womb, and feeling guilty about "original sin" is properly understood in relation to birth. There is no super father in the skies anymore than there is a super mother up there. Which brings me to my question: why is God always called a He instead of a She?

The first Reich was established in 962. The second one ended with WWI and the third with WWII. A Reich is only in the minds of people who identify with it. I would argue that a nation doesn't even exist