ha I love it! Happy stockpiling!

If we were to say that we attribute value to services and goods, then wouldn't it be that its proportionate what we all receive for the skills we provide? Man is always corruptible even without dollars, leverage is always there in some form or another.

Everything may be for sale as well, but what difference does it really make and what are the social factors that go into the purchasing of these goods? For instance I believe it'd be a great service if someone were to buy and release the knowledge within Vaticans archives sealed off to the public. Wouldn't it be great to purchase the informations sealed off from the world? I think regardless of money, people would chase status and material goods regardless of if, price were associated with that good. Money doesn't produce moral corruption it just makes it more in plain sight, no?

Pacifism is fine, I believe if you were to ask most people is violence right they'd answer no.
If libertarian is defined as "A person who believes in the doctrine of free will" and or "A person who advocates for civil liberty".
If socialist is defined as " social ownership - worker owned and self managed means of production".
If we establish Anarchy as "A person who rebels against authority"

Don't you then believe by definition an anarchist cannot be a socialist? That a libertarian can also be a proponent of any other doctrine because of this belief in free will and thus freedom to associate with lets say the republic party or Democratic Party for that matter? There is nothing wrong with living at home. But if there is strife in the world and in part caused by state why add burden to it and in doing so to the tax payers which fund it? Strife is added at an individual level as well as a state level? I fail to see why leeching betters anyone other than yourself.

What service do you provide your fellow man by doing this? Provide me your definition of "Left-Wing"?

Lets say that man is the idea of himself. When we do this we come to the republican side in which "we are responsible and everyone is capable of their own personal success" (To the degree of what each individual is capable of varies)
While the Democratic Party smears and says that the 'Minorities' are at a disadvantage and incapable without the pandering government parental figure.
If you believe in the economic developments or not, it is not of your opinion but fact. Recorded in time for all history.

Why is it the duty of anyone to satisfy anyone else? Do you lack volition to better yourself and create the world you'd like to see around you or in this case the "minorities"? Why is it wrong for anyone of any colour to choose to support the party of their choice?

I think the conversation has to be shifted away from "Money". I believe what hurts or makes people feel that the 'system' has done them a disservice is that people would like to solve problems out of their control. They feel as if they don't have the material goods which will satisfy them finally, once and for all!
Instead I think it'd be useful to think on an individual basis and assess what am I capable as an individual? Firstly if you live in a first world country, we typically have the welfare to provide basic necessities such as food, water, shelter. Do we need more? No. However this doesn't satisfy anyone, people like to view goods as status and or a sign of progression. If an individual has no organization to command and or money to spend on causes he deems valuable then you must ask when then can I do to better either myself if that's what I choose to focus on or if I can better my community. This may be as simple as organizing community clean ups or simply doing cleaning up yourself. It fosters a host of great benefits to the world. Inspiration, sense of community, the neighbourhood now looks clean and desirable. The individual needs to recognize and deal with issues on their own personal level.

I feel that this is a massive over generalization of the conservative population. We should address people on an individual basis.

You've referred to Trump as narcissistic, he is. However is that wrong? Before Trump was president he actually advocated for hispanics and blacks to be allowed into country/golf clubs and won the Ellis Island award. He's respected globally unlike Canadas Prime Minister. Not only this but he has broken many records for collective society, including: Lowest unemployment of hispanic and black communities ever - record highs within the stock market - he has implemented tax incentives so that people with invest into poor neighbourhoods (Opportunity zones). While his ego may be massive and shadow many others, he has undoubtedly helped many many many people.

Trump will win the 2020 election undoubtedly, the Democratic Party is much to obsessed with obscenities and economic hindrances. They puppet black and hispanic people about. This was shown very clearly when they wished for open borders however when Trump promised to have them brought to democratic strong holds, Nancy refused. I think everyone conservative, liberal, far left, far right all need to step back and start addressing each other as human beings. Its extremely disheartening to see each other being torn apart and not addressed as simple factions such as left-right.