There kinda isn't any free will, but we aren't enslaved either. Our will is just one of causes. And I like Nietzsche's idea, that there are nothing but subjects, which are centrums of power, and everything else is just efect of reaction one subject to another. Then, we will be as a matter of fact, only causes, just not on conscious level.

It looks like Nietzsche's conception of eternal return. But I think that if we would interpret present as including all the past, there would be no the same moments.

Freedom is ability to take responsibility for your life in front of yourself.

What with option that infinity is kind of being, like any others being, or other name for God?

I like the idea (Schaffer), that metaphysic is not about what there is (because everything exist), but about what grounds what. For example, theistic debate is not about if god exist, but if human is on ground of god, or god in ground of human.

Metaphysical as about what there is; questions like about mereology, temporal parts.

"Ontological" is like a level up in relation to "ontic". Ontological being is not only being, but also being who understands being. It leads to dispute not about words, but about kinds of being. If Ontological Dasein is essentialy different from others forms of being, we have ontological pluralism. We have two types of existential quatifiers, and neither of them is unrestricted.