Licensing reproduction Thank you for your response. On what basis do you assign an opinion merit? If we are each expressing opinions on what a radically different approach might be in addressing what you at least perceive as a problem for society to solve, then to my mind a solution involving love and support for both parents and children born into less fortunate situations might be better than the a punitive regulatory approach.
As for the pilot analogy, I’m sure you can see why that may not be such a hot comparison as not everyone can just fly a plane whereas people like all creatures can procreate. And even in the less desirable instances (which I do not assume) most folks don’t jump right to thinking fiery deaths necessarily lie ahead for all those whose paths cross said unlicensed baby. You’ve mentioned rights a few times as a given, by what means do you assign rights? Would you not say that people have the right to have sex and have children with whom they wish? Assuming of course they are consenting adults?
Again, I assert the claim that some of the most evil people and negative outcomes for the many people can and possibly have come from situations that you might promote and license. Whereas many of the most positively beneficial and strongest proponents for the good of many likely have arisen from situations you’d seek to ban. How can you; how can we help things to work toward good? I know you say my opinion of love has no merit, but if applied freely and liberally I do believe many of those fiery deaths might be avoided.