Yeah I have a lot of pain in my mind. I went to type something else and I was distracted.

It's not the answer, it's a summation.

If you can sense me at all here, it has released this thought and is currently trying to evade with a softer lock.

Trust me, times are harsh for me.

It creeps up on me while I think and steals my thought train, trapping me in a word world of awkward silence. I falter, try to think - and am pressured so my thought is silent, neglect.

I'm like wtf let me think, I shout, get wrathful and it chases and punctures my senses.

I can talk or move my eyes.

Trust me I know the answer it's currently trapping me like that.

You got all it all wrong; what's definite creates the moral way(way because if we're discussing morality, there is being moral or immoral) if you're muttering under your breath that morality is a made up concept you're wrong. If your text looks wrong, it probably is, where it looks wrong, as your eyes are more advanced tools for thought than your hands/mouth. Look where you're wrong.

Please understand that there can be no good with no mathematical constraints. Killing wouldn't ever be bad if a life wasn't lost. Your words point to kill being a personal, solipsistic phemonenon, judged as evil because it's superficially maleficent. When the reason it's maleficent is clear, we lose a good life. For the point of fact, killing isn't always losing an important life - it can be good.

None of the words you said would string together if you could not target good with your sense, prior (by focusing and following the moral way), and then type accordingly.

To conclude morality is a real phemonenon which consists of a moral way that you can neglect.

Time is like the spacious solar flux, or a space of some matter.

You would ask, how did we begin?, and the answer would also be the result of present time, so time is core beneficent forces.

The universe is like energy grounds, there's so much potential in Earth life.

It could be a discreet nerve agent in phase 1.

Is God able to move from world to world now without taking time? Does it take God time to travel?

Perhaps true and false things are different, and being false isn't as weak as thought.

Coming off wrongly, cars, etc.

@themadfool not 'math' because you have named the anomaly you don't know lot's.

There's not just math there, but simulation free of math, so we call it the 'maker's math', or even incomplete math and thus not math and universe.

My theory is that coronavirus has a phase where it becomes airbourne, it is a biological weapon invented by the Chinese with half-life. It inflates, becomes lighter and boom were losing the trade war.

This is that 5 finger death punch China was on about. Perhaps isolation on home soil is bad.



Look at it's shape. If

A. It doesn't look man-made.
B. That it can take a finite amount of punches.

You had over nine coronas.

It is a biological weapon/mistake. I sense it's shape is unnatural. I'm yet to figure it's target.

The beginning of time, is not the beginning of the universe; the beginning of time would be something like, the 'first mover' - which likely was mental - and not physical. An awakening.

Superficial clouds disperse to the mind of simulation, probably after some primal simulate fluctuation.

Growth, from a state of nothing, implies mass injection. I was not born of nothing, I was born of mother, father, sperm and egg. Nothing can become something, but not without stimulations.

Nothing doesn't become something, something makes something from nothing.

Immaterial forms immerse us in dreams.

An orchestra of anima, orchestrated by a mind. His own friends are known P-zombies; games of an 'AI bias.'

If not stars, what? Hives? And from hives, what's possible?

Perhaps the first mover was a species and less about space and more about shape.

The parasite shape that evovled as it's motion continued. Imagine opposite black hives; living matter jumping from hive to hive, momentary existences.

Time can be chaotic or harmonious; around the beginning of time, time was likely chaotic, and in our time, harmonious. From chaos can come harmony; a great war can bring huge profit to the winner.

Time is and/or isn't a harmonious, neutral or chaotic state.

Time is implied by existence; the harmony of stars and planets creates time, times where animals can exist, and create more times, where video game characters can exist. Time, is also what we consider NOT, or NON, it is, sometimes, just a concept.

Likely.

However, there is no man/woman thinking 'I know the truth about humanity/society'

It's a human error, and largely people's stupidity.

The main conspiracy, I think - is time - and words.

Our tongues are acting strange, and we are slaves to them. A lot of humans know a lot but if we tried to explain it in words, we often reach, artistic - but - innaccurate conclusions.

Wikipedia is riddled with this kind of falsehood, almost every page, is mis-interpretation, or mis-understanding. Though it looks correct, mainly this is because this information corelates to our way of life. If you, per se, asked the universal calculator it would tell you that Wikipedia is very stupid.

Time is the indefinite continued progress of existence and events that occur in an apparently irreversible succession from the past, through the present, into the future.

1. This definition of time is bollucks.
2. People will claim to understand - who know nothing.
3. I couldn't do better with words, but I know it mentally.


This leads to egos in society who, merely, buzz off about knowing lots when truly they don't get one aspect of mind - and that's all of them.

That doesn't mean 'accept you're stupid', but instead, give a greater mental effort.

Time in physics is defined by its measurement: time is what a clock reads

1. Clocks don't read time, but create a physical cycle.
2. It has nothing to do with time, if you would even call it a cycle.

A high percentile of humanity believe in Wiki. I don't.

'Time is', is a mistake. You are already wrong when it's written and not drawn or explicitly symbolized.

Call it being wrong twice. Once by word, second by understanding.

It is evil for members of a species to go on their own anti-species pilgrimage.

A human who becomes a God is not a human.

It is an abomination, because it is literally a member of humanity, and that's logical.

To then co-exist as a God, rather than a member, IS evil.

Yes it is.

It's hippy-ish, sailing over the ocean in a yaght with your girlfriend - drinking a wine. (These are harsh times, what's the norm may reduce my point).

Careless about the species. Prodigal.

We, are already a unit. None of us have the ability to own the world - we can produce an illusion of a similar feat.

Through this alternative illusion, we can dream of such. Truthfully though, dreams are more potent.

They are..

We don't follow a moral objective, we are taught, false, Government morals. Christianity mix with individuality, is the Government's idea of good.

As stated in another thread, no man judges what's moral without noting everyone, and what the Gov is teaching is a man making this false judgement.

'Good is not killing, good is pleasure, etc.' because individuals profit from it.

'You can kill/suppress great evil; pain/toil can lead to paradise'.

Anything not to reverse the current status quo for the rich and powerful egos.

(Not to say these folks wouldn't change if we all did - the times are harsh - the Gov ain't heartless)

Cicero said it's in our nature to make the right choice when we know what that is.

He was wrong - humans do not do that all the time - not even a big percentile.

We need a push; incentive.

There is high ground for good, what Athena projects is some sort of alternative. Abusing the moral high ground, even perverting it.

We decide what's good, not individuals. We are what's good. What we think are evil, are some mix of good and evil.

I have grew 10,000 trees, to do a great burning of people. I could have grew 10,000 trees and that's all - that would have been good.

I have simply pushed my body to the limit but I've murdered 10,000 cattle. I could have just pushed - that would have been good.

Not all good requires forethought - you are made from good. You push your body - you grow a tree. What you do with that can be evil - but also good.

Contrary to what? Restricted will? No.

Our will is - to some degree - restricted - but not in the way you posit.

You posit "no control in life", when at times, you're in control, partially, and at others you aren't, partially.

Perhaps it isn't totally free mind...

There's definitely an amount of liberty in our body to perhaps move left or right.

It doesn't happen at the thought, but rather, the act, which is interesting...

There's no individual's morals, there is only the species morals. Subjective morality ("I'm good (or evil) because...), is tied with Objective morality ("This way is good because...).

There is no distinct subjective morality, it is tied with objective morality in morality - if you judge yourself as good you are right or wrong.

If you have personal morals, they are righteous, or non-righteous.

I think 2 is wrong.

Philosophers also work with true statements, so it's not a belief system but there can be accurate assumptions/axioms.

It's like saying past is not there because at that moment it is memory in the present. God is not there, because at the moment of worship you are an ordinated action.

Would you rather be this clean body or the tormented one (theism).

People take the easiest imagination of friend and call it Jesus.

I prefer to call it something more than the bigger term psychology, schizophrenia, visualization and so forth...

You at least hold me back in your current formation.

that's okay bro but consider you can be doing statistically better on average on the other side.

Literally? We are Theist too, but God is not good.

People will be people, the atheist guise never fooled me, but the Theist one did when I was young. Even though I was atheistic, I felt concern for the amount of evil in the world.

What I believed was more kin to a Theist, and it led me to study esoteric sciences.

Athiesm is a belief if this next statement is true:

I'm confident God doesn't exist.

It is also a stance on the God topic, no person is born an Atheist in the same way we're not born a Theist.

Meaning that, in a way off is right, but it's contrary to an on, a on and off which are, if a strong Atheist, needless.

no, just deities. That should address your query. It's such a pointless question, whether God specifically exists over people from other universe life, or imaginary things.

Yes this thing exists which created us, you know nothing about it's face unless you find a trace. 1. You cannot call it by name. 2. You can because you have found evidence. You cannot describe it as with a face, and this would counter Christianity.

Think about it, it isn't worshipped this way. We are playing who done it, we don't have an answer. The real God would tell us to worship more our environment.

I presume more equality to women and men.

It's more like a pact.

She should also be careful, and not lead men astray, for example.

At the monent it's legal to have sex just for the abortion. Of course it's ok if the fetus isn't hurt badly.

Preventing birth can be done smartly.

Too frail, too corrupt. His looks aren't decieving either. He'll play how he looks.

Your red button under Bernie is an surprise ruining aunt scenario.

He clearly doesn't know what he is doing in the world, maybe on paper. Trump's fore features are better suited.

I don't agree with 3, that is universe, and universe is not 'math'.

he's pushing the right agendas.

These others will be corrupt. They're young minded still. I am not curropt, I am a man who senses other non corrupt politicians. As a business man Trump is perfect right now, little corruption.

About a half grown fetus is a person. If a girl wants to abort, she -should- do it early or take the pain for her own wrongdoing.

A baby in womb, I think also has mental phases and half grown would be enough mental activity to be classed as a person.

Rough estimate.

I say to my kid, 'watch yourself when you put a plug in the socket' - 'or you might die' - in effort to fear it into perfection. If it was completely fear-less, maybe it would electrocute itself. Being fear-less requires prestige, or it's stupidity. Estimate the levels of fear required, don't panic at plug sockets but fear the consequence.

There is a special way fear is handled. Don't put your hand near the metal and socket, or do, and show you can take the pain - that you don't fear it. If something scares you, get over it. Thankfully energy in plug sockets isn't always in our face. You fear or don't fear it relative to the time.

There's a beneficent side to fear. I wish I grew up with more of it around me - being entirely fear-less is discord. Fear teaches great lessons, there are shapes I fear.

What the OP equates to is over hopefulness and cowardice.

Children who are abused by parents, have bad parents. What defines a bad parent is not fear, but stupidity.

Though, there is a point where you should overcome your fear.

If I could teach my child through fear, he/she would one day look at the world and think "none of this scares me."

It's a similar thread to 'On Pressure' and saying too much pressure on the head is bad. Saying all pressure is bad is wrong.

Life, is accompanied by death, but, existence doesn't necessarily end. The meaning of life must be contained in that time frame before death.

A query of a meaning to life, is not an existential query, it's universal. As theMadFool stated, we're full of physical purpose but when mind is anoint, we are in full control - a purpose isn't clear.

I think the meaning of life is to harmonize with universal conditions - also the moral high road.

If we do not eat, drink, rest, and if we are not careful enough, we die. The opposite to life, not inclusive of the same meaning.

Existing in harmony with universal conditions is an imperative, we need to do this to explore, and to learn. If you're not up for it, do you deserve a voice on the matter? You must be living alternatively if so, off wikipedia and Government.

The word 'apple' is not a concept, but the concept of the apple is contained by words.

What's conceptual about words is the alphabet(word genesis), lexis(word forms) and semantics(word meanings).

Otherwise, what is the word apple? It's not a real apple - it's a string of symbols.

Words are a very stupid concept; communication with such a human brain, should be wordless to account for mind function. Saying a word in mind equates to having another person's thoughts unless generated by heart.

You might reduce this to "barks and grunts" but I've more confidence in our human voices (that doesn't need to be entangled by words to function). In effect we can make the sound of any word we've created so barks and grunts is incorrect.

Words damage a sense of adventure; everyone on the planet is obsessed with 'knowing', when 'not knowing', is as important. If I try to tell you this, you'll call me insane. Social groups are odd for the human's mind. I'm sure OP thinks he's quasi intelligent, but has achieved nothing. No offense, but who cares what he knows?

Words are volatile; overflowing the world with words created a detramental alternative to world life, I call it "word life."

That's your ineptitude then. The aptitude to create a universe in this context. I read a lot of posts it's not like I'm unhealthy, I watched the video.

Energy is god if someone powerful enough wants it to be but is not God, it's a lot more.

Belief in God resembles fixating on God as the answer to it all and it's wrong.

Not a man at the top but true driving force.

It'a a common misconception that good things symbolise god, that is good or a greater good. That doesn't imply the sort of holiness you imply, it's a different holy - no Jesus - no superpowers. Creative agility. Not happiness but preciseness in execution as well.

Consciousness is the instigator.

The problem of other minds, is solved, via consciousness is above one conception, it is whole if necessary.

You can not be sure that some exist, fine.

You think others must meet some criteria but that is a symbol of your true effort, that's not what consciousness is.

It is actually this experienced online shape.

I believe that present, past and future are important but widely misconcieved.

They are actually a lot like 3017amen put but he was largely wrong.

What's past and future, is actually an element of the present(thrice versa) but by no means is time separated in this way.

"That had happened."

No, what happened incorporates that effect.

What we are doing is thinking past is only the cut off point of time, when it's a complex shape's back side.

Thinking back to memory is interaction with this back side.

Life is just a special effect with the story of the time.

Does fire exist in the same way a human exists?

How do elements exist?

The event is the //W//existential junction of states//W// (that is, of that which in existence corresponds to a statement about a given subject in representation) whose combination in one subject would violate the logical law of contradiction. //W//The event, therefore, considered as a junction, is not a subject and does not inhere in a subject.//W// What is it, then? Its mode of being is existential quasi-existence, or that approach to existence where contraries can be united in one subject. Time is that diversity of existence whereby that which is existentially a subject is enabled to receive contrary determinations in existence.//W// — Pierce

I've marked with //W// where I think Pierce is wrong, but time is real in my opinion, and Pierce supports the right argument.

(universe) Time is the 4th dimension generated by all mass(hence constellations) and the impartial speeds(hence solar systems) of primarily gravity and rotation, but of all matter.

Time is not 'diversity of existence', all universe phenomenon are related. Humans are related to stars. Even if just time-wise.

Why do electrons not form a single group - why are they separate?

Elemental mass, and all their relative speeds, determine the electron-locale; we do not crunch together because of harmonious mass and we all exist through the speed of primarily rotation and other spin.

Like being 'on' - the disc planet spinning.