I don't know. This is your thread, not mine. It is up to you to explain what meaning refers to in a couple of sentences, a paragraph, etc. Saying that there are books on this topic does not resolve the problem. — MoK
Our consciousness today is nothing like it was at other times in history. — Athena
It is impossible to think like someone in prehistoric times — Athena
replacing the belief that illnesses are caused by the gods. — Athena
Without math, we would not have computers, televisions, and a much better explanation of evolution than the Biblical story of evolution. — Athena
Our reality today is created by us, not the gods. — Athena
Math gives us the consciousness we have today. — Athena
Your statistical claim — unenlightened
Given every morning of my life (that's more than 1,000) the sun has risen. Habit leads me to expect it to rise tomorrow. Now justify the doubt. Something like "I saw the devourer of suns starting to consume it last evening", perhaps? — unenlightened
Can one justify the doubt that the sun might not rise in the morning? One can say that it might not, but can one really doubt it? — unenlightened
Freud recognized two different types of processes, the preconscious, which contains thoughts that can easily become conscious, and the unconscious proper, which holds repressed material that cannot be directly accessed. — T Clark
I don't think that's the issue here, but as has been pointed out by Outlander, the OP and some associates want their points to be taken seriously about matters in which they have not read the source material. — boethius
I don't understand. If someone finds they've been trapped in a fly bottle of their own making, they're free of it. Their metaphorical eyes have been opened (the fly bottle is of course only a metaphor as well). They're to be congratulated, not denigrated. — Ciceronianus
Only if you're still buzzing around in the fly bottle. Once out, you may dare to think about, e g., your interaction with the rest of the world as an organism in an environment of which you're a part, and with others. But for those who like being in the bottle they've built, they may continue to indulge themselves. — Ciceronianus
This bloke has 1,7k posts here... suppose he's the little sunshine of this forum. — Ansiktsburk
It just sounds like they think humans are the exception when recent research into animals has shown that we are not special in much of what we do. — Darkneos
Could you please give me an example of an animal with the capacity to think? — MoK
Maybe the issue of whether Charles Manson should or should not have been incarcerated would likewise help out — javra
then is the purpose of philosophy showing the way out, or shaking the bottle? — Banno
gradations of transversely communicating probabilities across a multitude of drives and physiological mechanisms. — DifferentiatingEgg
Yes. But so often the fly is comfortable where it is. — Banno
suggests that humanity exists to achieve the intended outcome of some “higher” power — Michael
There must be a cause but there might not be a purpose. — Michael
The Duke's influence on Kant doesn’t have much exposure, assuming there was any — Mww
No problem. I see you have also wasted some time on Youtube with some philosophical ramblings. — Pieter R van Wyk
That's generally the main issue I hear people talk about with philosophy, it doesn't really enhance our lives. — Darkneos
You think that's because I hate blind people and that you're going to expose that hatred regardless of my efforts to conceal it. — Hanover
The reason I said that the beauty of a sunset and a legal ruling are different is because they are. — Hanover
You could start with just understanding Hegelian dialectics. — frank
Well, but there's the rub -- we do. — J
No one is telling blind people they are pariahs — Hanover
My objective, which is not that hard to decipher, was to point out the varying ways "beautiful" might be defined, which isn't terribly controversial because it forms the better part of aesthetics, which is to define beauty. — Hanover
It would be like asking you as an engineer to give me one fundamental definition of an engine. One that unifies all the types of engineers that there are. — apokrisis
I ask a simple question about a definition of a system and end up arguing about absurd nonsensical planetary questions. How odd. — Pieter R van Wyk
So we better not send anything from the Earth to the Moon or to Mars and leave it there, because doing so would result in the solar system flying apart. — wonderer1
Your need to isolate visual art as being of some special category of art that needs to be discussed is elusive as is your need to protect the blind from what you envision are attacks on their limitations. — Hanover
I suggest you learn a little about gravity first and the scales we are talking about. It would do next to nothing. — I like sushi
You think this is at all accurate?: — I like sushi
What exactly is the purpose, extent and method of the Lounge and Shoutbox? — Pieter R van Wyk
Could it help me get a decent, critical, honest review of my work? — Pieter R van Wyk
I don't see how you derived that from what I said. — Hanover
a legal argument could be beautiful, but not like a sunset. — Hanover
The question was what was consistent within the term "beauty" that makes it apply across all uses of the term beauty (which could include written essays, sunsets, music, or whatever). — Hanover
I really don't follow how I've been incosistent is arguing that all language offers some degree of metaphor and then in my asking for a definition of beauty that allows it to apply across diverse experiences. — Hanover
My view of art is that it is a form of language — Hanover
But seriously, I think you're using the term "beautiful" here in a pretty broad way, so maybe a legal argument could be beautiful, but not like a sunset — Hanover
My view of art is that it is a form of language, and the expression through painting is just another way of speaking, writing, or grunting. — Hanover
Bye! At least I got an answer to my question. — Pieter R van Wyk