They can't create them for real — Ludwig V
Car crashes are a great example of this, a far more cost effective method of testing automobile designs than crashing actual cars. — noAxioms
Minds/consciousness can't come from matter, therefore simulation theory is false. — RogueAI
But being that the simulation is a program, it should be deterministic, and therefore consistent; — Lionino
Another argument against the simulation hypothesis might be this:
A simulation is a representation, and a representation is selective and asymmetric relative to what it is a representation of. — jkop
Therefore, everything cannot be a simulation. — jkop
If this world is simulated, the "real" world must be very like this one - as in the "Matrix". — Ludwig V
why don't its 'designers' simply 'pop out' at times and leave us with some trace of their existence? Guidance through such a virtual world might be helpful, and yet there is no trace of anyone 'programming' or 'guiding' us anywhere. — jasonm
Similarly, why don't we sometimes notice violations of the laws of physics? — jasonm
Third: what type of computing power would be required to 'house' this virtual universe? Are we talking about computers that are bigger than the universe itself? Is this possible even in principle? — jasonm
My daughter's generation (she is 27) were very much given a discussion/debate/discourse model of education. But as I hinted above, different countries do different things.
What we probably need to do is cite specific educational approaches as implemented and then subject them to some evidence based scrutiny rather than just present untheorized opinions on 'education'. — Tom Storm
Rather than making me MORE susceptible to Nazi, racist, imperialist, settler colonial thinking, reading about the appalling behavior has strengthened bias (antibodies) against these ideas. — BC
Is anyone on earth an expert on global education? Who would even know 1% of what takes place in the realm of education on the planet? — Tom Storm
Lots of propaganda masquerades as "critical thinking" where the sole purpose of the "thinking" is to cast suspicion or doubt on the facts, e.g. to undermine the possibility to criticize false or nonsensical claims etc. — jkop
So perhaps philosophy is a prophylaxis against propaganda; it's just that we will never be able to agree on what "philosophy" should mean. — Leontiskos
Am I right in thinking of you, Ben, as an Englishman? — Banno
Here's some data that might be reassuring. More folk are better educated than ever before.
Critical thinking is more of a middle-class concern, perhaps, on the global scale. — Banno
. People are not stupid, but depth takes sustained effort, which is difficult for many people. Killing saber toothed tigers, domesticating wolves, figuring out how to get agriculture started, milking cows, mining coal, greeting every "guest" who walks into a Walmart... it all keeps us busy. No time for Plato and Aristotle. — BC
↪Benj96 If it's that simple, that hearing a phrase infects my brain with a meme or idea, then I can stop this discussion in its tracks by saying, "Don't think that viral ideas are bullshit."
Still think that ideas are viral? — BC
I just noticed this. What means would you use to bring this about? — fishfry
There is always a problem about excessive competition. There are usually systems in place to control it and they are at least reasonably successful. — Ludwig V
Make everyone an impoverished slave and feed them all the same bowl of gruel everyday.
That's the problem with "equality." — fishfry
Should it come down to people who have a lot, having most of their lot taken away to support those that don’t? You know, the greatest good for the greatest number. — Rob J Kennedy
Society's goods (material and cultural) are not fairly and evenly distributed -- and they never have been. — BC
Would you be willing to accept a set of principles that increases the prospects of others, even if it means having fewer opportunities yourself? — Rob J Kennedy
That "flavour of characteristics" is what I call ambiguity. Your use of this word conflicts with the idea you expressed above, about using well defined words with less baggage. — Metaphysician Undercover
Btw, it is strawman, not strawperson. — Lionino
This highlights the absurdity that can result from misrepresenting arguments and how it can lead to a situation where the original discussion is lost entirely. — Echogem222
information" in this case, so that the unintelligible is adequately hidden within what is proposed as intelligible, and it will appear like you are saying something intelligent. — Metaphysician Undercover
Yes, I think it's an idea worth entertaining that this universe we find ourselves in is a bubble, in a sea of other unique non interacting bubbles. — flannel jesus
the different possibilities don't necessarily have to interact with each other, do they? — flannel jesus
Well, given that THIS universe is possible, then there must be at least some part of THAT universe which looks exactly like this one.
So... at least for a brief moment... such a universe would look like this. — flannel jesus
I think the inference I'm driving at is that to bite this bullet would be to say something impossible is also possible — AmadeusD
Enter Greek Mythology cause this is how many of them thought? Time is a Circle that repeats all things have happened all things will happen — DifferentiatingEgg
It seems to me that a universe where everything is possible entails a world with multiple, causally isolated sub-universes. So there wouldn't be a beginning nor end to this universe as a whole, nor would there be a "conclusion" to it. Every possibility is actuallized in one or more sub-universes. — Relativist
Perhaps like overlapping superpositions of possible states which gradually collapse into optimally configured forms? Oh wait, that's this universe.... — Pantagruel
Is the Universe not existing a possibility, in this universe? ;) — AmadeusD