Kalam cosmological argument
"Craig then proceeds to somehow make this cause "divine" (of his own flavor, too), which mostly looks like a sleight of hand move."
Correct me if I'm wrong but if we grant that there is a cause for the universe, this cause has to have at least some godlike qualities right?
What I'm arguing is that we don't really need a god in order to establish something timeless and infinite
In other words if we believe that god can be infinitive then the universe can be infinitive too
in other words: when someone believs god is infinite in order to exclude him from premiss one, why dont we just believe that the universe is infinite, since god proves that its possible