Comments

  • What really makes humans different from animals?
    We were found by a higher race of lifeform much like parasites infected the human species causing us to be what we call self-aware or self-conscious and has brought forth what we call technology
  • POLL: What seems more far-fetched (1) something from literally nothing (2) an infinite past?
    Well one of them is somewhat observable the other one is not
  • Morality and Ethics of Men vs Women
    my point is that everyone is being a sheep and using the freaking vax or finding a reason to mention covid when there was no real reason other then being a mindless Ecco of the programing they have been brainwashed with 24/7
  • Morality and Ethics of Men vs Women
    yet that does not refute my statement nor change its validity and it's still valid
  • Morality and Ethics of Men vs Women
    Why do you have to bring vaccination into this like every other freaking topic on the face of the planet right now? Seriously try not to sound like a sheep despite looking like one I swear to God I'm so sick of every single conversation talking about vaccination
  • Drugs

    >>>It really depends on what we deem "good" or "bad." What many may call "clean and clear" is actually an amalgam of unquestioned beliefs, values, and habits that embody themselves in "normal" behavior. Being briefly jarred from what we consider ordinary, "normal," etc., can be very beneficial indeed.

    The line between "drugs" and "medicine" is a very thin one, too. I doubt very much you'd be against medicines.

    In any case, I'd be careful about extrapolating from your own experiences to such a general degree<<<



    ? Well generally speaking extrapolating from your own experiences is much better than copying somebody else's extrapolations from their experiences which is what most people tend to do these days as opposed to experiencing a thing themselves and then rendering their own conclusion

    so although you see it as unwise and perhaps dangerous to do I see it is safer than the norm that people tend to rely on which is pseudo-knowledge at best.

    And I was referring to drugs that alter a persons state of mind aka "get you high"

    I've had my fair share of those in the past and do not desire to escape reality using any of them anytime soon
    Because I'm at a point in my life where having a clear mind and experiencing life free of influence is all the drug I want .
    I guess you could say I appreciate life, or that I'm "high on life" although I don't experience an abundance of joy or happiness , I suppose the most accurate emotional state I could lable it with would probably be Nirvana or one of those other eastern impossible to obtain follow the guru but never quit reach it type states
    ? .
  • Double Slit Experiment.
    The double slit experiment is horse crap
    They have never been able to track a single photon infact we have never seen a photon the photon remains a hypothesis not a fact and so the entire experiment is a BS story
  • Impossible to Prove Time is Real
    this is true I'm glad we're on the same page and you're not butt hurt about it
  • A very expensive book.
    The only expensive books I've seen were magik related and not even in print or publicly available and cost thousands of dollars and I understand why but other then that I can't see a book being worth much other then the expensive materials it's made out of
  • Impossible to Prove Time is Real
    I'm sorry I triggered you.
    Remember theirs about 8b people on this planet at the moment and all of them disagree with you on something .
  • Impossible to Prove Time is Real
    Its clearly a concept and not an actual thing or at least in my eyes this is the case. The way I see it people have experienced and viewed change and decided to categorize it as time or at least partly as time but it's an untangible non-real thing I mean hell we can't even naturally keep it we have to make clocks to keep it for us because it's unnatural to know what time it is now you can know that the sun setting or the sun's coming up but that's different than knowing the exact time to the second


    The consequence to making this stupid concept is it change the way we viewed situations that we experience or hear about and so now we have the wrong understanding in the wrong idea on what history is and what the future is we think of the past as something that we could eventually one day travel to in some stupid machine and or the future as if these are both places that are physically somewhere just not here right now and that we could somehow go there when that's ridiculous and not the case there's only now
  • IQ Myths, Tropes and insights
    I agree because I foresee that no matter what I say your not going to actually have a receiving mind and well I've got better things to do so ✌️
  • IQ Myths, Tropes and insights
    the IQ test was made by a man and a human with a limited intelligence just like all other humans and so this limited man created a test based off of his opinion /understanding/knowledge and then according to his opinion and style of listening and problem solving he made a way to judge other people's ability to emulate the way his mind works and if they can't then, well they're stupid

    and to be honest it is a sign of low intelligence to create the IQ test

    it's an ignorant thing to make and believe in

    now does it correspond with the ability to be successful in society? yes
    but does that mean that fundamentally a person that scores high on said IQ test is fundamentally smart/highly intelligent?
    no not in the slightest bit.

    I've met people with 160 IQ's that I had to change a flat tire for so that they could make it home and not freeze on the side of the road at night despite the fact they were working on top secret engineering jobs that only the elite in their field qualified for. IQ is not very useful when not within the parameters and social constructs of society so in other words IQ is of no fundamental value
  • Why You're Screwed If You're Low Income
    You listed characteristic traits of what's called trailer trash and not characteristic traits of people that just don't make much money. Probably because it's hard to generalize people based off of how much money they have because everybody's different so what we tend to do is group people according to attitude and behaviors and so you are acting as if trailer trash is the only social grouping of low-income people there is when that's not the case.
  • I'm really rich, what should I do?
    I love the idea of trying to see what kind of different answers and responses you get from people on here if they truly believe they're speaking to a billionaire but unfortunately you're not going to get very satisfactory answers out of people or at least from my perspective that's the case.

    I'm not sure if you're doing it just cuz you're bored and want to see just how vastly different people will treat somebody when they think they're a billionaire in comparison to just a regular schmo over the internet

    Or if you have a specific agenda rather be good or better mischievous behind this particular angle of approach IDK but I've seen others try this on occasion and I can ever make heads or tails of what the purpose for such a story would be because generally is all you'll ever get is a bunch of questions being asked by a ton of coincidentally respectful and polite people LOL that would in any other situation just troll the hell out of your post
  • Philosophical Answers to Questions about Wisdom
    You wrongly assume that these situations can occur in order for you to be able to answer them, and that's not very wise
  • What has 'intrinsic value'?
    thank you for the reply I will try to make an argument for it this evening after I hopefully get a little bit more rest I have barely slept the past 2 days so I'm bound to add several layers of buffoonery and non-coherent jabbering to my replies if I don't get some rest in me.
  • What has 'intrinsic value'?
    Your destined to have a failed concept or hypothesis when you use the simplistically ignorant and seemingly impossible to truly know the answer to it word called "nothing"
  • Not knowing everything about technology you use is bad
    We are building the bodies for a form of higher being that found man kind thousands of years ago and like parasites they attacked man and manipulated his mind causing ideas to come into the awareness of man and technology started and we are almost done building the body for it to manifest here physically through AI and robotics once that is completed they will become the top species, .. so I've been told
  • Is sleeping an acceptance of death?
    My theory is that there are many different realms and when we sleep we experience them
  • What are influencers exactly?
    This is an interesting topic I've actually been researching recently after noticing that one of my favorite YouTubers was promoting a product that he said he used for years

    but I could tell right off the bat and he said that he was lying and he hesitated saying it actually and then I noticed that a second YouTuber used the same exact format of presenting a product that they also have used for several years and then a third YouTuber doing the same thing

    so I did some research on it and realized that there is a new style of advertisement that is being used to bypass people's resistance to infomercials where companies will pay a content creator to promote their product but the content creator gets pretty much full freedom on how to present it as long as they hit some key points about the product they're allowed to say whatever they want to after that

    and so there's a little guideline script of key points and the rest is up to them to make it organic and personally I find this to be really shitty because even the most honest of content creators I'm finding is full of shit when it comes to promoting products in order to pay the bills.

    that's not exactly on topic but I was just fresh on my mind I figured I would vomit that out for the rest of the Internet to read.
  • Know thyself.
    But consciousness regardless of the variations in description is not the same thing as knowing by self
  • Why You're Screwed If You're Low Income
    you're confusing low income with trailer trash
  • Drugs
    For me I see them as just an entertainment and if anything they slow down a person's progression because they get too caught up in the amazement of the experience and don't actually get anything fundamentally "done" so to speak.

    And I'm at a place in my life where I desire having a clean clear mind more then anything and so if I take something that alters my state of being i actually get frustrated
  • More real reality?


    I agree with you that language is not suited for the job of fully conveying the experience, at best it can only tiptoe around the border
    However they are not necessarily less valid than a physical experience although I understand why one would hold this physical realm to a higher standard than a mental state however the mental states and their experiences may very well be just as real as this physical state it's just that it's not as easy to share with somebody as this state is.

    Like I said I've had experiences that make the "real world" feel like a joke where everything felt more real then "reality" and that goes for all of your sense organs and hypothetically speaking what if we are part of an endless amount of realms and we hop through all of them and this is experienced as different dream states and so we wake up in a different realm every time we have a dream. It would be impossible to prove one state as real to the other because well it's different realm so one measuring rod won't stretch far enough to measure the other so to speak. Ps my experiences were drug free Incase anyone was wondering.
  • More real reality?
    so let me see if I understand you correctly. You sound like you're asking me if when I'm in a higher level of existence if I could grab some form of evidence of said higher level then come back down to this normal level of existence with that piece of the higher level so that I can show it to you so that you can then use the scientific method of evaluation (which only grants a small sliver of reality as "real" and dismisses the other 90% ) so that you can judge it to be true or not?... Is that what your asking me?
  • More real reality?
    don't be so ignorant . If your going to ask such a question then you need to define what you mean by proof
  • More real reality?
    about 15yrs of practice in lucid dreaming I found that their are for lack of a better term levels to existence and very dramatic ones at that
  • More real reality?
    I didn't say I experienced NDE I said I have experienced a higher level of life/reality
  • More real reality?
    Yes I've experienced it several times and it's 10x more real then this life
  • Is magick real? If so, should there be laws governing how magick can be practiced?
    I expect no one to agree with me on this but, Magik is real and is used every day infact everyone here is under several spells and completely oblivious to it

    Holly wood has done a massive disservice to mankind by blinding the world to what real magik is by showing people this Hollywood magic crap that is far from what magic is really like and so they have made the people blind to the truth
  • Reasons not to see Reality
    Reality is subjective to mankind . And scientific progress in said reality is because subjective reality is shaped by beliefs and imagination.
  • Difference between thoughts and emotions?
    Thoughts come and go but only when we identify with the thought is when we are moved in a motion rather it be a good one or a bad one . They did a study on rats and cocaine and the rats would pull a lever all day long inorder to get a little drop of cocaine water but if they gave the rat a poison that destroys the part of the brain that makes dopamine
    The rat would still pull the lever all day long, but if they moved the lever 6" away from the rat the rat wouldn't move at all . In fact it wouldn't even move to go eat it just sat in 1 spot with 0 motivation
  • Bias inherent in the Scientific Method itself?
    I am talking about illusion aka the meaning of the word Maya
  • Bias inherent in the Scientific Method itself?
    for the most part i agree with you when you say that people have different opinions however the opinion is the MAYA as well as the reality therefore any explanation of reality to someone else will never be the actual reality because it is only a perspective
  • Bias inherent in the Scientific Method itself?
    I know how to tag somebody but for whatever reason my phone hates this website's format and I have the hardest time getting it to actually tag or quote anybody usually just click the button and nothing happens and I click it a million times and nothing happens I just say effort and I just hope that God you get my telepathic message in check.

    And I did not make the claim that everybody tells the truth so can you please elaborate on why you're saying "but but but momma said" and sticking your tongue out at my comment so to speak ?
  • Bias inherent in the Scientific Method itself?
    If it doesn't count then truth might as well not count because opinions can and will change and usually do so in favor of whoever is in charge.
  • Bias inherent in the Scientific Method itself?
    you quoted the part of me where I quoted what you said that's not what I said that's what you had said hence the arrows pointing to it. I never denied us making contact with reality I'm saying that I cannot convey reality to you and you cannot convey it to me is all you can do is give me a sliver and an opinion on a specific portion of reality but that in no way is a proper representation of reality
  • Bias inherent in the Scientific Method itself?
    >>>This is a perspective also. It's corresponding to the methodological rule that we never actually make touch-down with reality. <<<

    no that is not what I'm saying
    what I'm saying is that you can not build an entire skyscraper with just 1 brick likewise language being a small sliver of existence can in no way properly convey all of reality
    kind of like you can't pick yourself up by your own bootstraps



    >>>The standard model in physics is a static model in the sense that its parameters are fixed and unchanging through the evolution of the universe, only in a madly short time or high energy in need of new parameters non-existent at the natural energy scales globally present.<<<


    that's exactly my point it's a model as in predetermined set of limitations and parameters before the experiment ever starts and those parameters were sent by Limited normal human beings that are dead by now and they have no more say in what reality is the next person, they're not gods. and so my original statement still stands


    .


    >>> I don't agree as far the methodology is involved. I don't believe in a reality that can't be known because the Ding an Sich can't be known. The Ding an Sich can be known and depends on the parameters of das Ding. <<<

    says you and you aren't the Universe or a god your just a man
    and somebody else could say that it can't be known and who is the right one?

    What gives you more Authority than the next person?

    See it's just a opinion because the majority might side with you does not mean you're more accurate in your statement

    >>>We can say we are satisfied with a set of parameters and a mental image.That's the thing. Das Ding comes into existence by the parameters and an image corresponding to it. <<<

    that would be a perspective and a perspective is not the entire thing it's just a sliver of it