Philosophy....Without certainty, what does probability even contribute?
I think the correct term to use here would not be logical, but rather that it is
a priori known that I exist. It's a level of certainty that I can't escape because my conscious experience is fundamental to my existence.To me at least.
If these thoughts are occurring, I can identify these thoughts, remember them later, then certainly I am the one who's doing it.
Even if there is some aspect of this process that is beyond my control, my awareness of this process implies the existence of a mind that can be made aware of thoughts or how they are processed. Even a process presumes that there is a certain type of organization of elements that exists to carry out a process. If I am not an actor, then at least I am subjected to these thoughts with acute awareness of them. All of these statements presume the fact that a mind or some awareness is present. If it was not, then I'm don't know how I would even refer to an "I", talk about thoughts that occur in "my" mind.
The subjectivity of my personal/internal experience all of it presumes the existence of an "I" or "my mind" or at the very least "a mind" that is experiencing these things.
If I talk about it in the third person, I can only do so as an observe. So for a statement like thoughts occur without a thinker presumes a certain observation from mind that can make said observation.
Notice in all of these statements, I can't escape existence of some type of being. The nature of such a being is possibly questionable and we might not know that for certain. However, escaping the fact of existence itself is quite difficult I think