Can you refute this argument? Argument: If we try to understand how the human mind works, it means that we have the mind as the object of cognition. However, we employ the same mind as the subject of cognition as well. (The MIND tries to understand how the mind works). Besides, we use the mind as the instrument of cognition while cognizing how the mind works. (No other instrument is available to us to perform this task.)
Conclusion: These dialectical conditions make it impossible for us to understand how the human mind works. — Dmitri
Your conclusion does not seem to follow from your Argument. You need to actually justify your conclusion and its connection to your argument. Why does it make it impossible?