There’s an endless war between art and morality. — ucarr

Is this an anfractuous way to say that God is ugly?

separate living beings of which one is dependent on the other. — Bob Ross

Again this is more true after birth than before, so birth should be identified as the starting point, if the starting point is based on individuality.

??? . I can't tell if you are joking. — Bob Ross

If the criteria for identifying a starting point is individuality (you say “an individual human being”) then the more correct point would be birth because until then the mother and child are inextricably fused together.

No Hitler's paintings but Hokusai's! — javi2541997

I don't know, kinda weird and dark, lol.



Loved that book, btw.

I added "cozy modern" to the prompt.



I wouldn't mind working there. With any luck the interior isn't decorated with Hitler paintings.

Both are evil.

Using the same prompt, the AI that I use also produced too many floors to the building. I then revised the prompt to use the number “3” instead of the word “three” and it worked.

It sounds like something might have struck a nerve. Want to talk about what's going on?

Don't just put what someone says on the forum into it and get it to write your response. — fdrake

I understand what you mean. It's important to engage thoughtfully and considerately, especially when responding to others online. Taking the time to craft responses that reflect understanding and respect for others' viewpoints is key to meaningful conversations.

millions of other things he says — NOS4A2

The millions of things are really a few things stuck on repeat. Never things describing a healthcare plan, for instance, or how he would end wars across the globe within 24 hours of assuming office, or how he would use the military to deport 11 million immigrants (including the legal cat munchers).

I did not find him crazy. — L'éléphant

Eating dogs and cats, and after birth abortion isn’t cray cray where you’re from?

The level of dishonesty with you is off the charts. — Tzeentch

Uh, what??? You just lied about what Mearsheimer said. Nowhere does he say that he believes Trump is running against the deep state. If you mean running as a candidate who promises to push back on the establishment then sure. That promise may have helped him get elected in 2016. Did he fail while in office or did he not actually try?

Why would I care if you’re a Trump lover, you can’t vote for him?

You forgot to include the part where Measheimer says “I bet against Trump” pushing back on the deep state.

You must understand that Trump makes all sorts of promises that he has no intention of fulfilling. If the establishment is all about pursuing regional hegemony why would Trump be opposed to that pursuit? We know that if there’s one thing he values it is power.

We're not talking past each other, it just seems that for whatever reason you're refusing to argue how Trump is anti-establishment. Measheimer doesn't see him as anti-establishment.

Oh wait, did Trump say that he's anti-establishment and you believe him?

Oil tycoons, corporations, and interest groups finance Trumps political campaign and lobby for policies favorable to their interests. We’ve just established that there’s influential US media that favors Trump. Trump has been involved in politics for at least 25 years, having first run for office in 2000. He was president for four years. How is he not part of the establishment? What did he do during his term in office that disrupted the establishment?

How about an argument that right-wing news isn’t controlled by the establishment.

You forgot to explain how there can be US news which flatters Trump if the establishment controls US News and hates him.

I don’t get it. If the US establishment hates Trump and they control the media then wouldn’t all US news be fake news (news unflattering to Trump)?

Huh? Two thirds of Republicans in Washington support the “big lie,” and pretty much the rest kowtow to his every whim.

Isn’t everyone supposed to hate Kamala, btw?

There is a bigger probability to read something negative about Trump on conservative media, than reading something negative about Kamala on liberal media. — Eros1982

Could you provide a link or two to negative stories about Trump on conservative media?

The idea that enemies of the establishment coincidentally happen to befall bad fates is just about as naive as one can get. — Tzeentch

This may be a silly question but why is Trump the enemy of the establishment?

The establishment:

the point is making people to work more. — Eros1982

Yeah, eight hours a day isn’t enough. Make America healthy again!

It’s obviously an act of desperation. Next week he’ll be promising to eliminate taxes altogether.

If democrats had majority control of congress Trump could pass legislation supporting workers.

It is remarkable that the conservative landscape in America is so bereft of meaning that someone like Trump could be a modern day Mr. Bumble.

Sure, but MAGA folk don't do implication good. For instance, what does Trump traveling to the 9/11 memorial with a 9/11 conspiracy theorist imply? It appears to imply that he's literally onboard the plane with QAnonish alternative realities. I think he's onboard with such realities because, like a religious authority, it allows him to be the ultimate arbiter of truth. If he says that he won the debate, for example, then that is the truth. If he says that he won the election then that is the truth.

I would not be surprised if this escalates. Eating people is next. — Fooloso4

Laura Loomer, a 9/11 conspiracy theorist who flew with Trump to the 9/11 memorial yesterday, wrote on X that the “Biden-Harris regime imported over 20,000 cannibalistic Haitians who are now killing people’s pets and hunting domestic animals on the streets of Ohio.”

What national abortion ban? — NOS4A2

"There's no reason to sign a ban because we have gotten what everyone wanted," Trump said.

I’m pretty sure that the 170,000 women who were forced to travel out of state for abortions last year didn’t want what Trump gave them.

I’m certain that all the pro-life folks aren’t pleased with the fact that the abortion rate hasn’t decreased by much if at all since the Dobbs decision.

that he wants a national abortion ban — NOS4A2

The abortion issue is a political tool for him, he wants whatever benefits him the most and that’s why he refused to answer when asked if he would veto a national ban.

She even said something like J6 was the worst attack on the US since the civil war, and on the eve of 9/11. — NOS4A2

You consider 9/11 an attack on American democracy?

“Tulsi, you’re fired!”

It’s an opinion regarding the principle. The principle is:

1.5 Parental Rights
Parents, or other guardians, have the right to raise their children according to their own standards and beliefs, provided that the rights of children to be free from abuse and neglect are also protected.

Brent DeRidder’s opinion is the opinion of all members of the libertarian party of North Carolina, and the opinion of all Libertarians in the US? I wouldn’t have thought that libertarians would relinquish their freedom of opinion so completely to one man.

His main argument suggests that abortions will happen irrespective of legal restrictions, advocating instead for imposing religious beliefs through avenues other than legislation.

If I think a state ought to determine its own laws that does not mean I think it ought to prohibit anything it wants. — NOS4A2

We weren’t talking about anything were we? We were talking about abortion.

Anyway, I hope you work out the contradiction some day.

Technically a lie, my bad, though a more generous interpretation would be that I was paraphrasing.

The contradiction remains unresolved. To repeat myself:

If you think abortion is a woman’s choice then the state ought not restrict that choice on any level and no matter how easy or difficult. — praxis

No, conservative libertarians don’t think that women should have the liberty to choose.

That’s not helpful. Assuming that you want to clarify where I allegedly lied, can you explain what you mean when you say, “The act is no one’s decision but the woman’s.”?

This appears to mean that you think the state should not to have the power to restrict a woman’s choice.