This is totally unrelated to the teleological argument. Please read the thread accordingly.

Of course. That was the reason i haven't wrote "kalaam cosmological argument" but just "cosmological argument". Becasue i am not saying the same thing as Lane Craig says. As i understood it, Dr. Craig talks about god as if it is a phenomenon which has always existed and just picked a certain time to create everything, using its transcendedness not as the bulk of his premise, but (kind of) just as a feature. Even though that version of the claim seems to me kind of bizarre, everyone is giving counter arguments to that version of the argument which is again, i think is nearly pathetic.

So yeah, it is incoherent with Dr. craig's representation. Despite that, i think i made it clear what my representation is but of course you can ask anything you want about it.