• Conflict Addiction
    it appears in that case the "central committee" was fueling the conflict.skyblack

    I hear what you're saying, some truth to it, but I just ain't going there. Doing so might interfere with my typoholic addiction. If this is unclear, ok, good. :-)
  • Conflict Addiction
    I'm not sure exactly the degree to which I suffer from conflict addiction. Maybe I'm just a typoholic?
  • All that matters in society is appearance
    The starting point of our interaction with others is appearance. Looking beautiful is all there is to success in society.Wittgenstein

    I've inhabited both the blue collar and white collar worlds. Appearance is much more important in the white collar world. I'm using that word broadly meaning one's public image, not just physical appearance. In the blue collar world it's more a matter of, can you do the job or not?

    In the blue collar world, if I can fix your toilet for a reasonable price, nobody really cares if I look like this.

    40120_1_468.jpeg
  • Is Intelligence A Property Of Reality?
    Are you advocating Communism?Gnomon

    More likely Blowhardism. :-)
  • Is Intelligence A Property Of Reality?
    in which everything in this world is one form or another of generic causal creative EnergyGnomon

    Ok, I can vote for this. I'm obsessed with the notion of a single unified reality (with apparent divisions being a distortion generated by how our minds work) If I understand, you're saying something similar, using your own flavor of language.
  • Conflict Addiction
    I agree the topic was a prop, but not because it was hiding ‘conflict addiction’( why do non-political topics on this site normally not generate the same heat?)Joshs

    That's a good question, thanks. Yes, what makes political topics so much more prone to testosterone hysteria? Don't have a ready answer...

    The middle east was a proxy for issues much closer to home, having to do with our relationships with people in our own communities.Joshs

    Like ourselves perhaps? Dunno. Have anything particular in mind?
  • Conflict Addiction


    Ha, ha! Sir Foghorn applauds the eloquent artistry of your post Sir Crank! And there's likely some truth to it. What kind of trouble might I get sucked in to if I wasn't distracted, and thus pacified, by the Internutz?

    Well, for most of the year I would be in the woods, the actual real world, where peace abounds. But this time of year, next few months, the woods in Florida tend to be a tad unbearable, even for hard core woods addicts such as Sir Foghorn. So it appears I'm on the hunt for young butts to kick, except that I'm too old to kick them in person, so I have to settle for a simulation.

    I got a bit of a bully thing going on here. Not that pretty actually.
  • Is Intelligence A Property Of Reality?
    The original meaning of the term, referred to meanings in minds. But it has recently been applied to describe the causal power (to enform) of Energy.Gnomon

    Casual power to enform?

    Since Energy is not a static property of matter, limited to a single form, it hops from one physical object to another. It's a general property of reality, not a specific property of any one thingGnomon

    Ok, I like this. And if it's true that matter is a form of energy, then nothing belongs to anybody? :-)
  • Is Intelligence A Property Of Reality?
    But, since quantum level Information (patterns, relationships) is mathematical, it actually occupies no space. So, compression doesn't destroy it, it just deconstructs the physical form that we can sense.Gnomon

    I get this part pretty much.

    So the data survives hyper-compression. Where is the data now? This question might help me tie my theory to what you're saying.

    I'm arguing along the lines that "intelligence" (likely a wrong word to use) is a property, not of this or that thing, but of reality itself. If we change the word "intelligence" to "data" maybe my theory becomes more science-like?
  • Debate Discussion: The Logic of Atheism
    I mean come on your mode of engagement is to ignore what I’m saying because you know it all already.DingoJones

    I do know it already. Again, please calm down, I mean you no personal offense. And if you find me offensive, just ignore me in turn.
  • Conflict Addiction
    If those involved in the discussion considered it meaningless they would not have reacted so strongly to each other.Joshs

    I think the experience was meaningful for those involved, but probably not because of the stated topic. I think the stated topic was most likely a prop, which served to help us hide our conflict addiction from ourselves.

    The theory here is that if we were actually interested in the topic, we would have taken some action to serve the victims being discussed. We could have, for example, used the thread as an organizational tool for setting up a GoFundMe page. None of us, this poster included, showed the slightest interest in practical real world action.

    I'm not condemning anybody here, including myself. This is a philosophy forum. Philosophy is supposed to be about a reach for clarity. I'm reaching, that's all.
  • Debate Discussion: The Logic of Atheism
    I made a number of points that you havn’t addressedDingoJones

    Please don't take it personally. I didn't respond to every point because I've already done so at least a billion times for 25 years. Everything you're saying, word for word straight out of the atheist dogma bible, endlessly repeated everywhere. Meaning no personal offense, really, just saying, nothing new here.
  • Conflict Addiction
    he was jokingJoshs

    Thank you, and sorry. My humor is so advanced that, um, I'm the only one who understands it. Or something....
  • Conflict Addiction
    The difference between the middle east discussion and a general philosophical thread is that the former thread applied philosophical and political theory to a real world situation in which people are suffering and in which commenters have a lot invested emotionally.Joshs

    I'm questioning the degree to which the commenters, this one included, were invested emotionally in the actual topic.

    Participants identify strongly with what they see as victims of moral or even criminal immorality and crueltyJoshs

    Questioning this too. I'd made possible exception for one poster who seemed to know people in the real world conflict zone. The rest of us, this poster included, questionable. How does participation in a meaningless activity demonstrate compassion for victims?

    To lose an argument is to let an atrocity go unchallenged.Joshs

    Except that none of us in that thread are in a position to challenge those committing the atrocities, however we might have defined them.
  • Conflict Addiction
    Haskyblack

    No, that's wrong, TOTALLY WRONG!!! What is wrong with your brain??? Are you on drugs? Is your mother in the world's oldest business??? :-)
  • Is Intelligence A Property Of Reality?
    So, assuming that the pre-big bang state was reduced to a set of non-material instructions, real but non-existent....

    What happens to those instructions after the big bang?

    Where are they now?
  • Is Intelligence A Property Of Reality?
    The Big Bang Singularity is sometimes compared to a Black Hole, in which material information is compressed into something we would no longer recognize as matter. It's close to pure, un-embodied mathematical information. :nerd:Gnomon

    I like this idea a lot, it is fascinating at the least. And I've never thought of it before this thread. So your participation is appreciated.

    If I understand, the claim would seem to be that nature compresses something which exists (weight, mass, form etc) in to something which is real, but does not exist (no weight, mass, form etc)

    This relationship between that which exists, and that which is real but doesn't exist, is of increasing interest here.
  • Debate Discussion: The Logic of Atheism
    I said repeatable patterns of reliability.DingoJones

    Please show us the reason based repeated patterns of reliability in generating provable claims on the subject of gods. Your claim, your burden.
  • Debate Discussion: The Logic of Atheism
    Nobody has faith in reason. People have very repeatable patterns of reliability that prove its efficacy.DingoJones

    This is the common atheist error, the assumption that because reason is proven good for many things (agreed) it is therefore automatically qualified for everything. And because they hold this typically unexamined assumption, they see no need to inspect or challenge those qualifications.

    And so, ok, let us reason together. Let us apply the very same degree of challenge we reasonably aim at theist authorities to atheist authorities. This process is often called intellectual honesty.
  • Israel killing civilians in Gaza and the West Bank
    Which is still irrelevant but you're welcome to use the search function and read my 4,500 posts. I'm not going to do it for you.Benkei

    You want to imply the evidence is there, but you just don't have the time to provide it. To you, this seems a clever strategy. Except that we all know, it ain't there. And you just can't bring yourself to admit that.
  • Israel killing civilians in Gaza and the West Bank
    Since Hamas denies Israel exists at this point, admitting beforehand to land swaps would implicitly admit Israel has legal claim to any land in the region.Benkei

    Right. Hamas denies Israel exists. They are clear minded, and honest about their position. Israel must die.
  • Israel killing civilians in Gaza and the West Bank
    I'm not going to divulge my identity you twat.Benkei

    Nobody asked you to.

    If you were concerned about innocent muslim victims, you'd be able to show a series of posts on this forum where you express concern for the victims of the Assad regime, victims of the Taliban, oppression by the Saudis, the Iranian regime shooting it's own people down in the streets etc. Any of that would do.

    If you were sincere, most of your outrage would be directed at those doing most of the harm to innocent muslim victims.

    It appears you only care about innocent muslim victims when Israel is the cause. That suggests it's not innocent victims you care about, but Israel. Ok, no problem. If you hate Israel, or however you might put it, fine with me, just say that.

    I'm helping you clarify what your real concern and interest is here. That's why they call it a philosophy forum, a community based search for clarity.
  • Debate Discussion: The Logic of Atheism
    Reason is not an authority, it is a tool one uses when one wants to make sense.DingoJones

    Ok, a tool if you prefer, and the atheist belief is that this tool can generate meaningful statements on the subject of gods.

    In the same way, the theist believes that holy books, or perhaps their personal experience, are tools which can generate meaningful statements on the subject of god.

    Competing claims. None of which can be proven.

    The primary problem atheists typically have is that their faith in reason (for this particular task) is so deep, and so unexamined, that they don't realize it is faith. They take reason's qualifications for considering the very largest of questions, those most far removed from human scale, to be an obvious given. And so it doesn't occur to them to questions those qualifications.

    Sincere.

    But unsophisticated.
  • Israel killing civilians in Gaza and the West Bank
    Hamas believes that no part of the land of Palestine shall be compromised or conceded, irrespective of the causes, the circumstances and the pressures and no matter how long the occupation lasts.
  • Israel killing civilians in Gaza and the West Bank
    Because it's irrelevant and I won't be offering such evidenceBenkei

    Oh for crying out loud, cut the crap. You won't provide the evidence because there isn't any, and you're not honest enough to admit that. Here's the relevance. Why should we bother to respond to claims made by someone who is not actually interested in the topic???

    Hamas rejects any alternative to the full and complete liberation of Palestine, from the river to the sea.

    Hamas is honest, even if you are not. Now read this....

    Hamas considers the establishment of a fully sovereign and independent Palestinian state, with Jerusalem as its capital along the lines of the 4th of June 1967, with the return of the refugees and the displaced to their homes from which they were expelled, to be a formula of national consensus.

    A formula of national consensus. That is, something Palestinians can agree on. Says nothing at all about accepting the existence of a Jewish state.

    Hamas wants a Palestinian state. Which will then be funded and armed by Iran. And then Hamas will continue to attack Israel, from a stronger position than it has today. And then, because Hamas will be more of a threat, Israel will have to respond with even more firepower. And there will be even more innocent victims than is the case now.

    The operative word there being "however".Benkei

    However, without compromising its rejection of the Zionist entity — Hamas

    Your relentless ego needs have caused you to make a blatantly false claim, and now you are scrambling around trying to clean up the mess, because the one and only thing you care about here is social media victory. This has nothing to do with innocent Arabs being bombed etc. Nothing at all.
  • Debate Discussion: The Logic of Atheism
    I haven't even turned on the computer for 11 days!baker

    WOO HOO!!! Eleven days. Wow, I haven't managed that since, um, 1994. Seriously. Thank you for reminding us it's still possible to have a life. :-)
  • Israel killing civilians in Gaza and the West Bank
    Yes, people do tend to whip out their crystal balls as an excuse not to work towards peace. Those are trust issues and it should be moved to where it belongs: negotiating.Benkei

    It appears your false claim about Hamas has been dismissed, and so now you're back to the usual dodging and weaving.
  • Israel killing civilians in Gaza and the West Bank
    says the guy who came in here and couldn't answer a simple question after 4 attemptsBenkei

    You want us to take your questions seriously, but you don't take the topic seriously yourself. You've been asked multiple times to demonstrate that you actually care about innocent Arab victims, and you've never provided that evidence, because it doesn't exist. Your entire engagement in this thread is just a pose designed to serve your own emotional situation.

    That's not a crime, but neither is it interesting.
  • Debate Discussion: The Logic of Atheism
    Atheism references no authority, you are making that upDingoJones

    Please introduce us to the atheist who comes to their position without reference to human reason.
  • Debate Discussion: The Logic of Atheism
    From the debate thread...

    The following definition, I thought, was agreed to by both of us:

    Atheism: disbelief or lack of belief in the existence of God or gods.

    That's the dictionary definition of atheism, written by people who work at dictionary companies, not by anyone who understands atheism in the real world.

    Atheism is not a lack of belief. It is instead a belief in an authority other than the authorities referenced by theism. Atheism is not a negation, it's a competing assertion. Thus...

    1) Both positions bear the burden of proving the qualifications of their chosen authority for the task at hand.

    2) Neither can do so.

    3) Debate collapses.
  • Vaccine acceptence or refusal?
    Vaccine information is medical information, that makes it none of your businessBook273

    If you wish to have a debate, you will have to first find someone who hasn't already expressed support for your position.
  • Debate Discussion: The Logic of Atheism
    Assuming I came to the debate not knowing whether to vote for Atheism or Theism and today is election day, who do I vote for based upon the respective positions submitted by our candidates?Hanover

    A vote could be based on which speaker is the most articulate, explains their position the most clearly etc. We could vote for a particular writer based on our opinion of their writing skill.

    But in order to get us to read them in the first place, we'd first have to see a debate which doesn't just recycle what's already been said 10 billion times.
  • Vaccine acceptence or refusal?
    I like Florida's position: $5000.00 fine for any business requiring vaccination information from customers.Book273

    You're arguing with yourself here. You agreed that the customer must comply with airline regulations, but then change your position in regards to all other businesses.
  • Vaccine acceptence or refusal?
    The vaccine thing I disagree with.Book273

    Read my post again. I already agreed that it's up to each person to decide for themselves on the vaccine. If they were smart they'd get it, but it should be legal to be stupid.
  • Vaccine acceptence or refusal?
    I don't think it's fascism to position yourself hard against reckless behavior.Christoffer

    Suppose each flight had a bouncer, like in a night club? If one raises a stink about a mask, the pilot sends back this 300 pound NFL linebacker Mr. Muscle Dude to discuss it.

    a5dd8a055a291efa6b382d101ecdc648.jpg

    Is there a problem here sir?
  • Israel killing civilians in Gaza and the West Bank
    Ok, a quick google search suggests to me that Hamas still seeks the end of Israel, but is attempting to strike a more moderate tone so as to somewhat unify the Palestinian position.

    This is a first impression, additional discussion welcome.

    The bottom line question seems to be, would the establishment of a Palestinian state along the 1967 borders lead to a real peace? Or just the next chapter of the conflict?

    Best I can tell, Israel has concluded the later, and thus sees little reason to agree to a Palestinian state.
  • Israel killing civilians in Gaza and the West Bank
    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-palestinians-hamas-document/hamas-softens-stance-on-israel-drops-muslim-brotherhood-link-idUSKBN17X1N8

    Hamas advocates the liberation of all of Palestine but is ready to support the state on 1967 borders without recognizing Israel or ceding any rights,” said Meshaal, in a shift that brings Hamas more into line with the position of Fatah.

    QUESTION: How is the liberation of all of Palestine consistent with the existence of a Jewish state?
  • Israel killing civilians in Gaza and the West Bank
    Here's a summary of Hamas by the BBC.

    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-13331522

    The 1988 charter - Hamas's charter defines historic Palestine - including present-day Israel - as Islamic land and it rules out any permanent peace with the Jewish state.

    In 2017, Hamas produced a new policy document that softened some of its stated positions and used more measured language. There was no recognition of Israel, but it did formally accept the creation of an interim Palestinian state in Gaza, the West Bank and East Jerusalem - what are known as pre-1967 lines.
  • Israel killing civilians in Gaza and the West Bank
    Yeah, it's comments like this that disqualify you. It's funny how you like to pretend to be impartial though.Benkei

    Is there any chance you could just shut up when you don't have anything useful to say? Again, nobody is interested in your emotional situation.
  • Israel killing civilians in Gaza and the West Bank
    A place to start perhaps...

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamas_Covenant

    Here's one section that may merit focus.

    The 2017 charter accepted for the first time the idea of a Palestinian state within the borders that existed before 1967 and rejects recognition of Israel which it terms as the "Zionist enemy".[2] It advocates such a state as transitional but also advocates "liberation of all of Palestine".

    What does "liberation of all of Palestine" mean to Hamas?

    I read the quote to mean that Hamas will accept the 1967 borders for now, but desires the end result to be the end of a Jewish state.