Never mind, I think we got it covered. :wink:

Yours is junk-yard dog rhetoric with rabid overtones — tim wood

And this is?:

That comment is so fucking nuts...that anyone attempting to comment on it further than what I am saying right here, is also fucking nuts. — Frank Apisa

But, fine, have a look at street's latest post and I'd also be happy to list sources and quotes therein that explicate why Biden is so unpalatable to much the left. Let's debate it on that basis.

Reading some of the stuff going on in the Joe Biden thread right now, I'm tempted to become a convert to TDS-realism.

That comment is so fucking nuts...that anyone attempting to comment on it further than what I am saying right here, is also fucking nuts.

Comment further if you want, Baden, but I won't. — Frank Apisa

And the specific policy positions mentioned? You agree Biden took those positions or not?

Tell you what, frank, stop talking about everything outside the US and I might take you seriously, otherwise it just sounds like you are sore because of a few things street said.

No, Baden...people like you are the problem. — Frank Apisa

People like me, whether in America or elsewhere, will vote for politicians who represent what they believe in. Biden does not represent what progressives or the left believe in. Ergo, many of our ilk won't vote for him (some will, but many won't). So, if he and his supporters want more of the left's vote, he needs to give the left something of substance. The Nazi angle is not going to work just from a pragmatic viewpoint (leaving aside the absurdity of it for a moment).

In terms of having a vote, correct. In terms of knowing what I'm talking about, those tables are turned.

The unique fauna of Oz have apparently eaten your brain. — Frank Apisa

Have you got any substantive defence against @StreetlightX's statements about Biden's policy positions? It's possible to have a conversation about that.

People like you, not just on this forum, but across America will get Trump reelected. You are his greatest asset and are doing everything he would want you to do. For free. Congratulations.

By saying things like this, you are guaranteed to alienate progressives and independents, who you need to win. So, if your goal with your posts on this site is to do everything possible to get Trump reelected, you're doing a fantastic job.

New Dem campaign slogan "Some things are more important than rape. Vote Biden".

:up:

Be clear, I'm just calling for a proper investigation. His chance to clear his name. At the moment, the woman is being ignored by most media outlets because it was a Dem and not a Republican that's being accused.

Probably the only good thing about Dubya was he wasn't a rapist. Far as I know. But yeah it's at least 50/50.

The right to vote includes the right not to vote. And the right not to vote becomes not just morally acceptable but morally obligatory if your choice is between two rapists. Luckily, there are always third party options.

The partisan Kool-aid dissolves all rational and moral sense among the sheeple.

So you vote third party or you don't vote. Very simple.

You don't have to vote for evil. You need to get your head around that.

Pretty much an exact parallel to the Kavanaugh case. Where are all the self-righteous Dems now?

@Xtrix @Frank Apisa

You're both just fine with this?

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/apr/24/joe-biden-sexual-assault-claim-tara-reade-deserves-to-be-heard-katie-halper

Biden has been credibly accused of sexual assault. No progressive who cares about women's rights should vote for him until a proper investigation is carried out. Period. And any who do are massive hypocrites.

I think the Dem campaign should run with that. "Vote for us or you're a Nazi".

Ok, what now?

This way, please.

Yeah I have no qualms about you guys roasting me — NOS4A2

Hey if you feel too hot, you might try pouring some liquid nitrogen over yourself.

Just an innocent suggestion speculation.

It was a good old puzzler. Had me stumped.

Agreed.

Essentially, he suggested it "might" be a good idea not that it "is" a good idea. The movement to the positive from the speculative is hyperbole somewhat justified by the added humor element and the fact that both brain farts are almost equally egregious. Like, I don't know, as if someone said "It might be a good idea to set yourself on fire when you're cold". And then the defense was, "Hey, he was just speculating, man!" He deserves every ounce of ridicule though we should be honest enough to acknowledge what he actually did say, of course.

So you didnt agree that concentration of wealth undermines democracy? That's bizarre. — frank

Last one. I do agree with that. If that's all you meant. We are in agreement. G'night.

He recently told me not to call him liberal. — frank

None of this is about me... Or what I like to be called. We were talking about historical facts. I'm not a historical figure. Yet :starstruck:



Not for everyone. Just look it up, Frank. You're not teaching anyone anything here. Goodnight.

It's not new. — frank

Sure, but what's new since the Boomer generation is the hugely increased wealth and opportunity gap.

See, e.g. https://www.amazon.com/Our-Kids-American-Dream-Crisis/dp/1476769907

Anyway, my bedtime.

Concentration of wealth combined with money in politics leads to political competition for that money with the currency of exchange being political favors. It's the voters who are sidelined.

Rather than addressing what I said, you both made decidedly unhelpful responses instead. — DingoJones

Nothing we've said is as remotely unhelpful as accusing someone of TDS. I ignored your question because it didn't directly apply to me.

Yes and https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buckley_v._Valeo

Ideologically, Hayek, Friedman. In terms of events, the 70s economic crises. Politicians, Thatcher and Reagan. In general, the rich and monied looking for ways to maximize their slice of the economic pie.

It depends on what you mean by "sold out". A certain class looked after its own interests economically. It included social conservatives and social liberals.

Neolib through and through. What about him?

Yeah, obviously.

It's the dominant economic paradigm anyhow. Trump is a slight aberration, but he mostly tows the line.

Trump is exactly what we deserve for the next four years. — Xtrix

At last you got it.

I agree that it exists. — frank

Aha! Another sufferer of TCDS! :gasp:

Clinton and Blair are big ones.