“ glad the joke wasn't lost on you haha, there's always a risk it's going to be taken seriously when I say something like ”


-flanell jesus



.no kidding aside, when an apparently private exchange becomes public domain and the distinction between humor and poetic license follows indigenously , then a pause may become a throw back to the uncertainty of those distinctions.

Very sorry it is Zizec and Lacan ( blame it on artificiality

Sizes & Lacan ; without rhyme, reason, confirmed/confirmed to a naysayer of present in a kid’s (being there) in a candy stire (‘Being There’- Jerzey Kosinski)

-YiRu Li

May I interject here a bit?

The Eastern way i IS the Western Way, way way back. Big Brother has always been watching us, and we lost that along the way, and now that same way He is recreated artificially.

Proof: China was technologically very foreward looking and now the West is simulating IT

-Tom Storm


“ Thanks for making the effort to clarify but I'm afraid I can't make sense of your response.”



And thanks for that, and again I don’t mean this as a sign of intending not to clarify, but the sentiment quoted above is nearly impossible to separate from Nietzhe’s resentment, broadly speaking.

C
A real clarification will assuredly follow.I promise .

-Tom Storm

“ Can you reframe what you said in more direct language?”

-Tom Storm

“ my question is what is a mindset? How are you using this word? Is it personality or worldview or a habitual disposition?”

The question revolved around determinism versus the free will issue, and the pre-cultural, age that didn’t concern with the psychological aspects that a mind set had to contend with, ergo the affect/effect dualism could not have said to have occurred as dualism, in those times.

The reasons for this the movement away from deontology per solidly grounded rules by which causation could be presumed to play a part,(effect); except by relevance to spatial relationships that could literally judge a ground relating to actual causes effecting actual observable witnessed events.

That example at a certain time transformed into the movement of relationships between the observable which became slowly understood as the original event which must have been the earliest non observable event.

The transformation into the critical phase, where everything became doubted, became an extreme shift to support that ‘Whole’ that became synonymous with God and which was supported by that type of reasoning.

The transformation for ‘affect” from ‘effect’ was the result of such critical thinking, converting the original spatial , defensive territorial protection of early cave men referred to, to the evolution of the spiritual defensiveness of a generic, out of the cave protection against the natural elements and it’s supernatural counterparts.

The reach for this security , once it’s absolute manifestation has been shown to consist of a singular event, found that acknowledgement eroded over time, and the new vision required new sources of power to take up the slack.

Simulation toward that goal again turned 180 degrees toward negating that threat as an unproven absolute, and thereby dialectical logic replacing the loss by processing data through natural to artificial means .

The mechanistic reformation of a material exclusivity, changed simulation of events into a link between nature and it’s axiomatically reactive vindication of it’s effectively described transformation to an affective equivalent.

I am embarrassed for the expansion to more volume and perhaps more confusion, and my only defense is the unavailability of prior discussions .

If this be the case, I must attest to my ability to recall subtle nuances that can not ‘naturally be accounted for.


To sum up, to answer your question, it is dispositional that is, a deontological movement of willfully disposing the three elements of personality, general disposition and a particular world view into the singular content , a de-differentiated phrase denoting the three in one concept of ‘state of mind’ a melange, a sentiment, encapsulating more of a feeling state , which Sartre’s ‘self thought man’ had expressed as a nausea .

Tom Storm
Vera Mottt
YiRu Li


Therefore affect(affectation) may trump an effective way to determine an honest ‘mindset, regardless of the meaning ascribed to it., therefore it’s uncertain to evaluate it on basis of a prima facie contension

YiRuLi , welcome.

If born too tall or short, does it cause a fear of standing out, I.e. of a secondarily derived cause that could affectively bar a deontological formative background: as an example of a window of opportunity to change the emphasis by verbal manipulation?

Must confess I totally agree, that is true, a very Kantian categorical expression that predicted such limit.

In Buddhism, the ‘flow’ presumes a sensibility that an infinite duration has established through pretended repetitions. The film breaks, as was the case in the early days of black and white film, to reveal one frame, referencing specific action, where the thought of that referential frame can evoke the sense of transcended intention, through it’s own sense .

The tentative pretense as it approaches the sense of sensibility, conduits the repetitive progression of variable, relative uncertainty , as far as that sensibility concerns the overall generally accumulated impression of it’s self through both systems of aporehension, is indeed such a process best described as gnostic.

“ I am not "missing the cognitive element" within the cause of action, I am downplaying it as inessential. This is evident in involuntary acts, reflex, etc.. It is simply not true that you must have made a cognitive judgement to be afraid of snakes. Creatures are born with many such innate fears, prior to the capacity of making cognitive judgements.”

Metaphysician Undercover


That is correct. However it appears to reinforce the idea of reversibility of the essential idea from a intensive sentiment, that always appears as a tentative presentation, never able to catch its faith Ian’s confidence of running out of air up ahead.

The mouse may simply be afraid of small spaces, as unable to fathom that essentially up ahead the largesse of quantum objects are relative to the time it might take to see in the darkness, and indeed it has been shown that the vampire bat is not too far away from a mouse, and such gross distinctions are extremely difficult to make, as an analogous comparison between dusk and dawn, that is uncertain at that juncture.

So reversibility is essentially a necessary pretense prior to its cinceotiin

“Far too often though, the judgement made prior to the trial and error action is represented as non-intentional, to avoid an infinite regress of intentional acts.”

— Metaphysician Undercover




…an example of how thinkers of the day dealt with the issue of describing a reverse ability between determined and undetermined presentations of facts, as noted , unsupported above by using the same argument.

Additionally, many thinkers wrote with reverse transcendence in mind , where they really qualified the state of social representation, as an observation of things as they are, not trying to preserve a modus operans to intentionally change the status quo.

A simple by-product of human tribalism is the tendency to project upon leaders or innovators all sorts of magic powers or extraordinary attributes of self-creation and individualism and to celebrate them like demigods. Or even as the incarnation of egregious and preternatural malevolence.
— Tom Storm

‘who is afraid of Virginia Wolf’ Edward Albee excerpt line really moved me :
“… as Matthew exclaims, :


But it really happened” ( behind the green door)

Anyone probably comment with sources of additional material, on the premis that a singularly read topic, transpires from a non assuming single text, that is quickly progressing to a collective singularity of inclusiveness .

Any takers in a cognitive default along the lines of Kurtzwell et. al. , toward the archetypical, all inclusive phenomenal unity between apprehension of sense and ‘ non-sense’ (representation)?

Reading from various sources about the quizzical confusion about the diagnostic criteria around the issue of the ambiguity between autism , genius and madness.
The process by which the continuing debate may correspond to a literal continuum on which the issue could be appraised and narrowed down to manageable levels of approximation.

A look at John Neumann’s The Computer and The Brain, could lead to a more accelerated process of prediction.

Guess going back to a flick, that left audiences in. vail of tears, ‘Love Story’

True love meets a test of both, popular and iconic measures of authentic truth;

Love is present when you can never need to say you’re sorry.

“ If you want to come up with an original idea, then you gotta be on edge of what's known, the logical next step tends to follow once you've had a revelation. The idea of revelation in the sense that something becomes suddenly visible and audible with indescribable certainty and accuracy, which stirs and upsets one—describes simply the matter of fact. One hears—one does not seek; one takes—one does not ask who gives: a thought suddenly flashes up like lightning, it comes with necessity, unhesitatingly, revealing a hidden path in the dark.”

Vaskani


Possibly establishing a link between links between paradoxically ‘original’ questions Meno comes up with, commensurate with predictive signs of parables which have claimed miracles as their ground.

I am Deaki, been think much of AI and how it is a natural reaction to lost memory as connected to a very lost weekend. Although Kerouac says “I accept lostness forever’ and also was said (sad?) to say that we ARE living in Golden Eternity but do not , or can not know it singularly, until said prophetic singularity, where that may be singularly OR interpreted otherwise.