• To be an atheist, but not a materialist, is completely reasonable
    NB: ... "yinyang" ... "atoms swirling swerving in the void" ... "E=mc²" ... "fermions & bosons", wtf are woo-ologists talking about? :sweat:180 Proof

    You have done nothing but insult. Good reasoning requires following some laws of logic and your post is not a good example of that. Name-calling such as "woo-ologist" is destructive to the communication process that I expect of people in the philosophy forum.
  • To be an atheist, but not a materialist, is completely reasonable
    This is the second time in my life that I've seen someone suggest materialists don't believe in energy lmao. How is that supposed to work? All materialists believe that matter moves around, right? And matter requires energy to move and interact and change directions and so forth, right?

    I've never met a materialist who doesn't believe in energy. I have, however, met non-materialists who say materialists believe that. THAT'S what's truly mind-blowing.
    flannel jesus

    No matter does not move around. If my computer desk decides to move itself to the other side of the room, I will scream and run out of the door. Not many materialists are in agreement with Native Americans about the sacred land and the wrong of exploiting it. Matter constantly changes but the leaves do so much faster than rocks and neither the leaf nor a stone has the power of moving. So exactly how do you understand the energy of which you speak?

    Materialists do not see reality like this...

    The earth, in a very real sense, is our mother. We are born from this mother, from Gaia; we are extensions of the earth and the cosmos of which it is a part. This means that our conceptualizing and our spirituality also extend from the spiritual dimension of the cosmos and the earth.Thomas Berry

    I am not sure but I think the big divide between materials and the spiritualist is disagreement about the source of the energy that makes life possible.
  • To be an atheist, but not a materialist, is completely reasonable
    Thank you for the recommendation. I have added it to my list of books to consider buying in the near-future. I am a big fan of literature that seeks to fuse seemingly incompatible paradigms, into a new coherent understanding of the universe.Bret Bernhoft

    The book "Great Thinkers of the Eastern World" is easier to read than Fritjof Capra and prepares us to understand Tao which is great for reading Greek philosophy and thinking of things such as Democritus’s ideas of changing physical phenomena. :wink: All the sources of knowledge we have to choose from make living a wonderful thing. It appears you want to enjoy it all as I do.
  • Culture is critical
    You're welcome Athena, but I think Tim Booth should get all the credit, for writing such good lyrics.
    I found this wee website, with this introductory comment about the song. I don't think it's far away from our interpretations:

    "This song is very much open to interpretation, and depending on they way you process the words, it could can be a warning against overindulgence, a look at surviving life on the edge, or a commentary on how you can always turn your life around. James vocalist Tim Booth, who wrote the lyrics, has explained that the character Daniel in the song saves a woman named Grace from drowning, and adds, "He doesn't realize that in saving her he's really saving himself."
    universeness

    Philosophically I am seeing a question about what makes us good. Most ancient people used a notion of family for social order. Going out and drinking and catering to one's impulses in the moment is a life without purpose. Family and saving Grace gives one's life purpose and this might be better than indulging one's impulses at the moment.

    I can not read or hear the word "grace" without thinking of the "grace of God".

    Here are some definitions of grace and they are fitting in this thread about culture being critical because graces calls out the goodness in ourselves and others.


    Grace Definition & Meaning

    Merriam-Webster
    https://www.merriam-webster.com › dictionary › grace
    grace implies a benign attitude and a willingness to grant favors or make concessions. by the grace of God. leniency implies lack of severity in punishing.
    ‎Synonyms of grace · ‎In a state of grace · ‎With good grace · ‎Grace period

    Grace Definition & Meaning

    Dictionary.com
    https://www.dictionary.com › browse › grace
    the freely given, unmerited favor and love of God. · the influence or spirit of God operating in humans to regenerate or strengthen them. · a virtue or excellence ...

    GRACE | definition in the Cambridge English Dictionary

    Cambridge Dictionary
    https://dictionary.cambridge.org › dictionary › grace
    the charming quality of being polite and pleasant, or a willingness to be fair and to forgive: She always handles her clients with tact and grace. grace noun ...

    Grace - Definition, Meaning & Synonyms

    Vocabulary.com
    https://www.vocabulary.com › dictionary › grace
    The related word gracious originally meant "filled with God's favor or help." Grace was borrowed from Old French, from Latin gratia, "pleasing quality, favor, ...

    What is Grace? Bible Meaning and Definition



    BibleStudyTools.com
    https://www.biblestudytools.com › dictionary › grace
    An accurate, common definition describes grace as the unmerited favor of God toward man. In the Old Testament, the term that most often is translated "grace, " ...
    — several

    Going from the last definition, being a person of grace is being god-like. In this case, the god is a definition of excellence, not a supernatural being and truly I believe we are healthier with a concept of god that brings out the best in us. This is possible without the superstition that destroyed one other religion, Zoroastrianism. This possibility depends on knowing truth. Truth is in harmony with nature. Superstition is not.
  • Culture is critical
    It's not my freedom. It's the American conservatives'. Yes, they are intent on tearing down the federation. https://www.commoncause.org/resource/u-s-constitution-threatened-as-article-v-convention-movement-nears-success/Vera Mont

    I read some of your link and do not understand how it applies to concerns about our freedom. Do you want to explain what concerns you?
  • Culture is critical
    It's one of those songs that leave the interpretations of the lyrics to the listener but does set a definite base focus, as your words that I underlined above, indicate. My personal interpretation was a variation on yours. I took the song writers to be suggesting that the images they were invoking were accurate for many people but the fact they were 'getting away with it,' was 'messed up.' The writers could also have been admitting that this is what is 'messed up' about themselves and aspects of their own life experience, so far.universeness

    I understood the song to say that being human is being messed up. I don't know what we might get away with because sooner or later the consequences of our actions catch up with us. It might not be us personally who face the consequences of our actions because the damage may take three generations to be felt. At least that is what Socrates explained in the debate about justice. Sooner or late those we exploit will become a problem for us. We can most easily see that as we deal with racism and a history of slavery. Our forefathers screwed up and we are paying for that today.

    I don't think the song meant the whole of society but as individuals, unless we got super good parents and all the advantages of society, we will be screwed up. That is just how it is for humans.

    "Are you aching for the blade?" (are you violent, or attracted to violence or attracted to being the victim of violence?), "Are you aching for the grave?" (Do you have no fear of death, but in fact welcome it and don't give a flying f*** for anyone else life?)universeness

    I appreciate those words and how you presented them. That is youth. I was a Greaser and that included risk-taking and willingness to fight. I kept a notebook from one high school year because I had a sense I was going through a crucial life-changing time in my life. On the cover of it, I drew a creepy hand representing death and a tree stump representing life. I see in the song that period of transformation.

    "Daniels saving grace, she's out in deep water, hope he's a good swimmer"
    Grace as a person Daniel is trying to save or grace imaged as a feminine aspect of Daniel, which is currently saving Daniel.
    Whichever image you choose, that 'grace' is in trouble, as it is in deep water so, the writer hopes Daniel is a good swimmer and he and his 'grace' can mean, he can survive his own inner turmoil.
    universeness

    Being both male and female is Jungian. I think the stage of determining our sexuality justifies restricting any medical treatments for our sexuality until we have that status of adults. Preferably this would be 30 years of age. This is a little off-topic but perhaps interesting enough for its own thread? Perhaps we could pull more people into the discussion if we start a new thread. What you posted here is a great way to start that new thread.

    Oh, how familiar this line is for me. My youth spent doing exactly this, in the pubs and night clubs of Glasgow. I was also a good dancer and did very well, attracting female attention. My main two friends were also good looking guys and we did not often, go out to a night club without ending up going home with a girl. But, what did we achieve, absolutely nothing, shallow, hollow, but seemed fun at the time. Getting away with it all, but basically 'messed up.' That's why the way the lead singer Tim Booth emphasised and stretched the word 'Now,' a little, spoke so clearly to me, as pub and club escapism fun, is very much of the moment, and can seem very 'mis-spent,' when looking back. But, I do think that the reality is more nuanced, than such a conclusion would suggest.universeness

    I very much appreciate your explanation of this. It could have been my X out dancing with you, while I stayed at home alone with our son that he thought he had to have to prove he was a man. Unfortunately, he was not interested in being a father and eventually abandoned us. And so we spread human suffering from one generation to the next, but when I was young I resented civility and wanted to be on the wild side when I married the guy with the biker's jacket and boots. Hey love, I don't know the best words to convey how good I feel looking back at that past from the wonderful perspective of old age and with that song in mind. Thank you so much for this wonderful gift.
  • Culture is critical
    See US gun lobby/ gun laws/ mass shootings. See Munroe Doctrine. See the unending wrangle over health insurance. The argument against doing what's good for most people is: "Freeeedomm!!!!"

    And the US is a christian country, formed and constituted and ruled in the Abrahamic tradition of might makes right. Plato did not sign the Declaration of Independence.
    Vera Mont

    I am not sure but I think your freedom may be, anarchy and I think anarchy is intolerable. On the other hand, understanding culture and the importance of education is vital to human beings being ruled by reason rather than authority over them.

    I agree that the Abrahamic tradition of might makes right is problematic! It was not demons or a fallen angel that made humans behave like animals. We evolved to be as we are. It was not a god who made us good, but knowledge and full bellies and a sense of security. Take that away and quickly we degenerate back to animals fighting for our survival, running on hunger and fear, not reason.
  • To be an atheist, but not a materialist, is completely reasonable
    I am a true atheist (as well as humanist and capitalist); someone who does not believe in or give legitimacy to the traditional concepts of gods. At the same time, I am not a materialist. Because I observe there is a happy medium between these two absolute extremes. Somewhere "a something", which is closer to the highest truths, can be unearthed, studied, understood and applied.Bret Bernhoft

    You might enjoy The Tao of Physics by Fritjof Capra. It is mind-blowing to me that we are still materialists. Everything is energy. Logos, reason, the controlling force of the universe makes matter possible.

    Western thinking since Rome has been very materialistic, but not so much the East. Without India we would not have a concept of zero and without zero we could not have the maths we have today. The materialism we have is a cultural problem and :lol: leaves the believers of the God of Abraham, that is Jews, Christians, and Muslims with a big problem! How do we explain the existence of God and the Holy Spirit when every is made of matter?

    Back to math, if we all learned quantum physics we might not be able to maintain our notion of separate material and spiritual realities.
  • Culture is critical


    I am sorry I do not know what you mean.
  • Culture is critical
    I liked James song. Last night I saw a show about ethnicity and how rape music gives these victims a voice. James is a good counter to that. Like being all messed up is part of life.

    Like oh my God, I am White and I am all messed up and there is no one for me to blame for this. Well, I am female. I suppose I can blame men for oppressing me but now that women are "liberated" who can we blame?

    Back to the topic of this thread- we need a culture that resolves more problems than it creates but when people want to maintain ethnic differences how can we achieve a culture that unites us? Boo hoo hoo, those ugly white people took me from my alcoholic mother and cared for me and put me in a White school where I was treat treated like one of them because they hatefully won't let me have the culture of alcoholism, rape, stealing, and self-pity. Help me with this. I am angry about all the divineness and victim mentality and the lack of identity with a multi-ethnic democracy and united effort to raise the human potential.
  • Culture is critical
    If panspermia is prove true then perhaps we all come from Mars. I can confirm that you do have valuable points of view. I think it's just that many many words are very over-burdened. Many words are also considered as 'strictly belonging to,' a particular umbrella subject. Spirituality is one of those words that is traditionally associated with theism or theosophism. Even though the etymology of 'spirit' is, 'breath'.
    To be spiritual originally meant, to be alive, to breath and be animated. It had nothing to do with ghosts or gods.
    universeness

    Yeah! :grin: What you said is so agreeable to me. I remember spiritual concepts such as "He is in good spirits today". Meaning the man was happy. Sometimes the happiness was related to drinking spirits meaning he got drunk.

    The Spirit of America and the Spirit of the West are portrayed as women leading the way forward. These are not beings but representations of concepts.

    When I realized there is no Santa Claus I was unhappy with my mother for lying to me. She explained Christmas is a spirit, a feeling we have and it is real. For me being spiritual is about a feeling. We can nurture positive or negative feelings and happy or unhappy thoughts. That is actively being spiritual.
  • Culture is critical
    If you say so... But logos doesn't catch the bombs before they hit Baghdad!Vera Mont

    You are right. Logos is the laws of nature that can not be violated without bad consequences.

    And that's why they value their individual freedom over any collective benefit.Vera Mont

    That is nuts! :rage: I am unsure of what you mean to communicate but I put that problem squarely on Christianity and believing in a god that can violate the laws of nature and be controlled by human behaviors such as reacting to human rights and wrongs. We are so vain, deluded, and ignorant. That is not logos, the laws of the universe.

    Abstract. Plato regards education as a means to achieve justice, both individual justice and social justice. According to Plato, individual justice can be obtained when each individual develops his or her ability to the fullest. In this sense, justice means excellence.

    "Plato's philosophy of education: Its implication for current ...
    — Myungjoon Lee

    Education in the US was based on an understanding of logos and what men like Plato and Cicero said, not the Bible or German philosophy. It is not Christianity that made America great, but the ancient world and those who came to us from the past.

    That "rage" of the no-longer-privileged has been carefully nurtured by a succession of political and religious manipulators, continuously since 1865.Vera Mont

    That is agreeable but not the whole story. The story is not complete without awareness of the harm done by well-meaning Christians who believe it is them and their god that made the US great and their interference with education as they worship a god who has favorites and blesses his favorites with slaves and wealth. It is an old problem starting with Judaism and a god telling them they can not be slaves because of their special relationship with Him, but they can owe someone their labor for 7 years and they can own slaves for life and their children will inherit them. This just gets their head in the wrong mindset and instead of acknowledging the wrong of such a belief, they use denial and counter statements such as we are all God's children. Rationalizing away much of what the Bible actually says.
  • Culture is critical
    Universeness, look at what I found about language-

    Though many people take language for granted, the reality is that the words we use say as much about the way that concepts are arranged within our brains as they do about the things they actually denote; they assign meaning to phenomena by picking out those attributes that seem most worthy of meaning to us. Subsequently, the fact that different languages use words to assign meanings in different ways has led to a long-running debate about whether humans naturally conceptualize the world in culturally relative – rather than universal – ways.Ben Taub

    I am very excited because it sort of explains how my understanding of words is not the same as everyone else's. In the private world of my head, thoughts are arranged differently.
    This leads to a lot of arguing and frustration. Hopefully, by learning better communication skills I can overcome the problem. :lol: Maybe someday instead of feeling like I landed from Mars, I will feel like I belong here and have a valued point of view.
  • Culture is critical
    Your first quote above imo, should be used by Jamal to promote TPF.
    Your second quote is is very well put, and makes me feel a little regretful that I just posted an attack on you personally :yikes: for your willingness to accept the use of the word 'sin ,' as an accusation against humans, ignorant or otherwise. :grimace::lol: /quote]— universeness

    :lol: I am glad I read this. I hate it when I make an ass of myself and I have not always been as courageous and honest as you. I have been listening to a long explanation of better communication and you have practiced a principle of better communication.

    As for not accepting my use of a word, I am constantly in a battle with Grammarly. It tries to correct me constantly and that feeds my concern that this technology is a huge evil! It can not think conceptually and when I want to speak of a concept like "industry" or "education" it wants me to use "the". Grammarly wants to turn all concepts into tangible nouns. The horror is, what that does to our thinking when we think everything is a tangible thing, rather than an intangible concept. :lol: I was once banned from a science forum for using the word "God". The moderator could not get past "God" being a being instead of a concept such as logos. It is not a false God until you add mythology to it. Whatever, a large part of our communication/thinking problem is our understanding of words and tendency to think everything is a tangible reality instead of a concept or metaphysical matter and Grammarly is part of the problem!
    universeness
  • Culture is critical
    impersonal emotionalism,Vera Mont

    That is a very interesting term. Is that mob rule? Being caught up in impersonal emotionalism. If it is impersonal, the individual is not responsible but caught up in the wave, no longer alone but part of the mass, as happened on January 6, 2021, when the US Capitol was attacked by Trump supporters. Those people who attacked the Capital were so happy to be a part of something bigger than themselves. I don't think any of them thought they could be held personally responsible.

    That is exactly the mentality and emotionalism of the Nazis. Those tried for war crimes were shocked when they were held accountable for what they did. They thought of themselves as the good guys and part of something much bigger than themselves.
  • Culture is critical
    Why is it so important that we have the freedom to do as want?
    — Athena
    Because you are a or the major world power.
    Vera Mont

    I believe that concept of power is a delusion because no group of humans no matter how create their numbers or their wealth and technology, that power is not the ultimate power. Above the gods and humanity is logos. Those who do not understand it correctly and live in harmony with it will eventually fail. Democracy is not rule by the powerful over the powerless. When correctly understood, democracy is rule by the people and for the people to rule successfully they must be well educated and capable of good moral judgment. Moral being a matter of cause and effect.

    In history, Britain was able to exploit less advanced peoples, but Britain failed because they were thrown out of those countries. The US stepped in and tried to take the place of Britain and it is failing too. Let us hope this delusion and failure does not bring us to a nuclear world war.
  • Culture is critical
    Few if any! And that's the worst part of it. Just look at the history: People really wanted change after the Bush years and got Obama. Then other people really wanted change and we got Trump.ssu

    Ah, I got you. Wanting change and depending on someone else to change things, is like being a good Jew, Christian, or Muslim praying to God to fix things. In the 60s we said, "If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem".

    In many countries with stagnant political systems, when new parties finally come and win elections, do reforms and then years later people decide to vote for the old parties. Because many times the old parties still have competent politicians if the party isn't totally tarnished and politically dead.ssu

    :chin: The topic of this thread is culture because there are two ways of having social order, culture or authority over the people. To have liberty and a strong nation, we must rely on culture. Authority over the people is not democracy. So now what is it that political people need to know and what are they supposed to do?
  • Duty: An Open Letter on a Philosophy Forum
    Why do I hear marching music in my head when I read this?Joshs

    As a woman who was a daughter, mother, and grandmother, I strongly believe we need the concept of family duties. I dearly wish the people who deliver my mail had the sense of duty that they had in days of old. I strongly wish our journalist would return to understanding their duty, to tell the truth so we can make good decisions.

    When people understand their duties, we are defending our democracy and that is something the military can not do.
  • Duty: An Open Letter on a Philosophy Forum
    What "duty is a noble lie"? Duty is a concept and it is as real as we make it. You know, a concept, an abstract idea, not a tangible reality that either exists or does not exist like a broken vase is either broken or it is not broken.

    It, whatever the concept may be, is as we make it, or as we see it, and there is nothing that can not be trashed. However, trashing something such as the notion of duty does not make that something a lie. It just means the person who does not enjoy a sense of duty does not have that experience. Same as one person can enjoy a setting sun while another person may be a sourpuss and have no sense of pleasure in watching the sunset.

    A leader's duty is to convey the concept of duty and explain how to put it into action so that the sense of duty is experienced and felt. This is true of all virtues. They must be named before we can be conscious of them and then we must act on the virtue to experience its fuller meaning.

    Personally, I love having a sense of duty and I would make knowledge of duty and virtues part of education. There is no god that makes it as it is. We make it as it is. The concepts are as real as we make them. Or we can make everything really bad but why would anyone intentionally do that?
  • Culture is critical
    And democracies can make huge mistakes, don't think otherwise. But you can learn from mistakes. The best example is the UK and it's Brexit. Just ask the British how well that has gone or look how popular the UKIP is now there. Brexit was such a huge disaster for the UK that all the euro-sceptics in the EU countries have really toned down their criticism.ssu


    I am sorry I am very aware of what happens in other countries. I do not any British people to ask about Brexit. I know US citizens are strongly opposed to one world government because they fear that would diminish their power to do as we do. Hum, that could make a delicious topic. Why is it so important that we have the freedom to do as want? What is gained if we give that up?

    When it comes to learning from history the lesson that dominates my life is Hilter and the power of his charisma and how I see the same things happening in the US. The US adopted the German models of government and education for technology for military and industrial purposes and it is curious that we would imitate Germany and deny the changes in our culture, economics, and politics.

    Every child learned of the American heroes and the American mythology that made us a united nation and a very moral nation. Today, Christians have taken credit for our democracy and we think God wants us to engage in wars against evil nations. And I have no idea what Trump and his followers think "Make America Great again" means. Without education for democracy, that is never going to happen and Trump is doing the same as Hitler did and his popularity keeps increasing as the legal battle with him continues. For sure Trump and his followers are in favor of isolating the US from the rest of the world.
  • Culture is critical
    Putting flowers on a street unites nobody;Vera Mont

    It makes me aware and includes me in the mourning even if it may not include you. I very much like the bicycle that is permanently on the corner where a bicyclist was killed. It keeps waking me up to the awareness of bicyclers and the need to be alert. And for the biker's loved ones, I am sure that memorial gives them comfort and that one life is not completely gone from our consciousness. I wish we would do more to remember the people worth remembering. At least one school memorialized a janitor who had been a part of the school for many years. I like that the memory of a janitor was honored.

    Many truths in our lives are not shared truths because our individual experiences are not the same. Clearly how I experience life is not the same as others experience life. I think I have more of the forbidden spiritual experience. When I was young, during that time of the month, I would become hyper-sensitive, as though being extended beyond my physical form. I think there is a hormonal element to how we experience life.
  • Culture is critical
    Logic is great, but it doesn't replace self-awareness.Vera Mont

    How can self-awareness be increased? I think this needs to go with the awareness of others too. Racism blows me away because it is such an expression of unawareness of the other human being.
  • Culture is critical
    More every day. There are lots of books out on alternative living; there are intentional communities based on a different principle; there is a tiny house movement, people learning to do things for themselves, eating local food, conserving water, pooling resources, teaching one another -- there's lots going on that you never hear about, because somebody doing something sensible is not as scary or tearjerky and therefore not as newsworthy as somebody deliberately running other people down with an SUV and buying fresh food at the farmers' market is not as emotionally cathartic as turning $15 worth of cut flowers into garbage on a sidewalk.*

    (* It's a pet peeve of mine, all those bouquets, teddy bears and stupid mylar balloons piled up at the scene of every minor atrocity.)
    Vera Mont

    I really like what you said until the last thought. As I see it, those flowers, teddy bears, and balloons unite all of us. It is shared mourning and I am glad to be part of that. But I have rather odd notions. I enjoy feeling connected with the whole of humanity. I nurture this by learning as much as I can about history and the mothers around the world. Men, I think identify with their work, while traditionally women have identified as the caregivers. That is a kind of oneness that perhaps men do not share unless they do so as soldiers. The Veterans Administration takes care of its own and they have always done so. A few Roman generals made history by assuring those who fought with them were well cared for. While us women folk take action to assure all children are fed when they go to school. I think men are more willing to cough up the money for veterans but if it is women and children who need our help, that is socialism- a very bad thing.

    Sorry, universeness got me hung up on wondering about how we identify with our gender. If I am off topic it is his fault. :wink:

    Hum, culture is critical but who defines the culture? How does our gender and religion play into the culture?

    Back to what you said, it gives me hope. There are as many good things happening as bad things, and maybe those bad things will pressure us to do more of the good things. :grin:
  • Culture is critical
    Yes, I agree that we see some things quite differently. I think you assign some value to that which may be labelled mysticism, the transcendent, the numinous, the esoteric, the 'spiritual' or perhaps even the the theosophistic.universeness

    :brow: You say what?! How do we know truth? :chin: I think that might require the scientific process, but not all things can be processed scientifically because they are personal experiences and feelings. Then we have to rely on communication and reasoning. Our technological society is running very short on the ability or willingness to do that.

    I am hoping, that understanding Daniel Kahneman's explanation of two different thinking modes will improve our ability to reason.

    I am really curious about why you associate my writing with mysticism? For sure there are many things that mystify me but I don't think that is what you mean. As for numinous, I do enjoy spirituality but I do not think of myself as separate from spiritual reality. The spiritual feeling arises in me when I walk along the river or sit on the beach. As the ancient Greeks, I think beauty is very important to us and good music. I think we need to nurture our spiritual being because our mental and physical health depends on it. An evening of watching police and forensic shows is not my idea of a good way to take care of myself and I have come across the science that says so. :lol: Unlike Socrates, I do think I know a few things, but what I know is very little compared to what I do not know.

    I am sorry Athena but I could not disagree with you more, on this important point.
    Ignorant people, defined as 'people who have learned very little in their life,' are people who are manipulated and abused by vile notions such as 'sin.' This word is commonly defined as:
    "an immoral act considered to be a transgression against divine law"

    For all atheists, there is no divine law. It's existence is an utter lie and the best evidence for that, is divine hiddenness. In comparison with the crimes of god, as described in the bible or the crimes of characters like Mohammed as described in the Quran, I am totally sinless. I am convinced I am sinless anyway, as it is not possible to perform an immoral act considered to be a transgression against non-existent divine law.
    universeness

    Ah yes, but what is divine law? Is something bad because the gods say it is bad or do the gods say is bad because it is bad?

    Wikipedia
    https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Divine_law
    Divine law is any body of law that is perceived as deriving from a transcendent source, such as the will of God or gods – in contrast to man-made law or to ...
    ‎Citations · ‎References[/quote]

    It is not so because the gods make it so, it is so because of logos, and to know logos is to know science and even the gods had to surrender to logos. Now if you want to prove to yourself you can fly close to the sun with your wings made of wax and feathers, you can do so, but know this, the heat of the sun will melt the wax and you will fall to the earth and die. This is not because the gods make it so, but because that is the way the universe works. Nothing can rile me faster than denying the reality of universal law or equating universal law with the gods. That denial is to not know reality. Go ahead and fly into the sun and test it for yourself. No amount of praying or burning candles and chanting will change logos. It is what it is.

    I try not to anthropomorphize nature in such ways, although I do fall into these old traps often.[/qhote] No, you do not. I am not saying what you think I have said. Thanks to Christianity everyone interprets what I say with the Christian belief in God and our power to control God with our pleas and efforts to please Him. You are interpreting what you think, not what I am saying. You put that false notion into my words, not me.
    universeness
    Nature has no gender or sex. It is very important to understand the workings of our planet, for the sake of the survival of our species. We both agree on that I think. You just choose to invoke more 'esoteric,' anthropomorphised images to do so, compared to me.

    Okay, you got on that one. I do love my relationship with the Mother Goddess. I am she, you know. Hum, I don't know what words to use to explain my pleasure of thinking in Mother Goddess terms, but I wonder if men get this wonderful feeling when they identify with a male God? However, you are right that I do not think of the Goddess as a manifest reality. I am strongly matriarchical, and when I speak of the Mother Goddess, I am thinking of values and my own identity. Historically she did not punish her children as the God of Abraham punishes his children. She also does not help them. She does her own thing and leaves her children to do our own thing, and if we eat poison, or destroy the planet, oh well, she isn't going to clean up the mess we make, so we darn well better figure how things work and do the right thing. That is very, very important to me, and blending what I think with superstition can make me a little hysterical! Failing to know truth and do things right can have very bad consequences.
  • Culture is critical
    Much of the world, including the US, has its head so far up its own ass in denial, you have to wonder whether the species is viable at all.Vera Mont

    I can't believe you said that! :rofl: Well, yes, that is what I was thinking.
  • Culture is critical
    So do I. But Americans simply have to understand that the present system can totally change, and actually quite quickly. The naive thing is to think that it's the Presidential election where you could have someone not being either a Democrat or a Republican that can change things. Nope, change starts from the communities and the states and also the federal level. And it's possible.ssu

    I hope I understand you correctly. Before things will change, we need to know there is another way. How many people do you think are aware of other ways of doing things than the way they have always done them. Maybe especially so in the US the belief that the way we do things is the best possible way so their minds are totally closed to knowing anything else is possible. Making matters worse is that increasingly people are feeling disenfranchised and they believe they are powerless to make things be as they think they should be. Their world is very small as they know only their own experience of life and in defense against rapid changes they have no power over, they intentionally isolate themselves or believe they are part of a political party and go along with their party without thinking.

    I don't know what I think until I start writing. I am not sure but I think circumstances have us in a bad place right now. We need strong leaders who help us see there is a better way and that we can make a difference. There have been periods of rapid change in history and the unrest and uncertainty led to chaos until adjustments are made. Hum, :chin: a time or two civilizations have collapsed because they could not make necessary adjustments.
  • Culture is critical
    I think humans need to utterly reject that stupid term from theism. Sin does not exist!!!!!!!
    If a person does not accept the existence of god(s) then it is not possible to go against it morally.
    If humans break any aspect of secular moral code or human law then they have broken our laws or went against our moral codes, not non-existent gods. Godless humans cannot sin!
    In my exchange with Vera Mont regarding the love label, it becomes clear that it's an over-burdened label. I think you have acted often, in support of the well-being of strangers and that shows that you have a great capacity for compassion towards your fellow human beings. You should be awarded the NCA (if it existed,) in my opinion.
    universeness

    Thank you for your argument. I see things differently. :lol: Sometimes I think I was an alien who got stuck on Earth because my UFO had mechanical problems.

    I have zero problem with thinking sin is a matter of ignorance. I am out of time. Mostly my thinking on this matter is Cicero and when I get time I will find Cicero quotes that I believe are essential to understanding morals and democracy.

    Ignorant people can and do sin. Their ignorance is a lack of consciousness because when they know they are doing wrong, their conscience bugs them. We are programmed to do the right thing and to feel bad when we don't but most of the time we are ignorant of why we should do this and not that. We really do not understand the importance of truth!

    We are destroying our planet and sooner or later we will have to deal with the truth. I think most of the world is having to deal with the truth, but they are in denial, while they flee floods, hurricanes, and fires.

    Logos, reason, the controlling force of the universe. A better understanding of God than what mythology gives us. Mother Nature will do things her way and we better figure out how she does things and learn to live with her. Truth is very important and so is living in harmony with nature very important.
  • Culture is critical
    What I think would clear up a lot would be that the duopoly of the two parties would be finally broken. But Americans simply believe in the impossibility of the "third party" and that I think is the biggest problem. Easiest way would be if both the Dems and GOP would separate into different parties themselves.ssu

    I disagree that is impossible to put an end to the two party system. Simple adopt the Australian voting system.
    The Australian electoral system comprises the laws and processes used for the election of members of the Australian Parliament and is governed primarily by the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918. The system presently has a number of distinctive features including compulsory enrolment; compulsory voting; majority-preferential instant-runoff voting in single-member seats to elect the lower house, the House of Representatives; and the use of the single transferable vote proportional representation system to elect the upper house, the Senate.[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single-member_district — Wikipedia

    I especially like being able to vote for several candidates by numbering your preferences, so if the first person you vote for does not win, your vote goes to the next one. For years I would have voted for people who are neither democrat nor republican if that didn't mean risking the worst person winning the election. I think most of us in the US are voting against the other guy, not for someone. I hate our system. My state is testing the Ranked-choice voting.

    Ranked-choice voting in the United States

    Wikipedia
    https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Ranked-choice_votin...
    Ranked-choice voting (RCV) can refer to one of several ranked voting methods used in some cities and states in the United States. The term is not strictly ...
    ‎Use at state and federal levels · ‎Use at local levels · ‎California · ‎Massachusetts
    — wikipedia
  • Culture is critical
    That's a longish stride from moral and immoral speech. I was there when it was considered highly immoral to mention homosexuality and perfectly acceptable to feature blackface in a performance. Morality is as suspect in my book as brotherly love. But I think we can agree on a standard of public discourse - so long as everyone has an equal share in decisions-making.Vera Mont



    I love your argument.:heart: What is going on here? In other forums arguments are terrible but here the arguments are so mentally stimulating and fun! I guess maybe that is because the people who are here understand the limits of a point of view and enjoy questioning what they think as much as I do.

    I totally get the change in morality and that is why we must make these arguments without attacking each other. The progressive mind expects change, whereas the conservative mind may resist change and can not explore why yesterday this __________ was okay and today it is not.

    Okay about homosexuality, sex was taboo. I don't care what a person's preferences were, sex was for studs who could be manly and force themselves on women, and a good woman was a pure woman, untouched by a man. Bad girls did it but not good girls. Oh my, we had so many sexual problems back in the day and in some countries, the sexual issues are still terrible!

    So how is talking about our sexuality okay today? Power. Does anyone want to talk about what power has to do with our sexuality? We could create a thread for that and a thread for our changing morality about blackface entertainment. Moral, is a matter of cause and effect. When the consequences are good it is moral. If the consequences are bad it is immoral. What does this have to do with democracy?
  • Culture is critical
    In one of Kurt Vonnegot's novels, that I don't have time to look up right now, he says "What the world needs in not more love but more common decency."Vera Mont

    Would that include all media decision-making?

    I do not think our freedom of speech means the freedom to say anything we want because it would include immoral speech. A moral is a matter of cause and effect. If the effect is bad, it is immoral. A lack of morals leads to anarchy and that is not tolerable so it becomes a police state.

    The only way to have a moral society that is not does have authority over the people, is education for good moral judgment. That is education that transmits a culture where liberty is not harmful. The education teaches, that we defend our liberty by obeying the laws and if we think the law is wrong, it is our duty to take the action to change the law.
  • Culture is critical
    So, you agree then that getting completely rid of the house of lords would be a good first step in starting to improve the way UK politics works?
    — universeness
    My point is that WHEN you give any stakeholder status in the upper house, be it as now the remnants of the aristocracy and retired politicians, or in your proposal "important stakeholders", once decided, the elected stakeholders will fight for their right to have their position in the house. Even if they aren't important anymore. They will be against change as the aristocracy has been in reality. Hence you need elections on just who are stakeholders. And what are "important stakeholders". For starters.
    ssu

    Oh my goodness, I think it is high time for the US to clean up its Congress and get real about aging. I do not see how our present system can not be corrupt! Our presidency is limited to two terms and certainly, that should apply to all of those sitting in elected offices. This should also go with stronger rules for serving the people rather than serving one's self. Kick out the Industrial and foreign lobbyist and their gifts. We should not be ruled by those who can be bought.
  • Culture is critical
    Why do you choose to disconnect, empathy, and altruism as facets of love.universeness

    I love your question. I love it when I have to question what I think and feel.

    I don't propose to answer for Athena, but for myself: because "love" is such a loaded, booby-trapped word. It evokes sentimentality, hypocrisy, Christian doctrine and a whole a passel of emotional stuff with which I don't want to be lumbered. I have compassion for people I find quite unpalatable and for animals I would never want to encounter in the wild. That empathy, or sense of rightness or whatever it is is quite distinct from my personal relationships in which affection plays a major part. Also, I consider some constraints on my freedom, some obligations of time an effort, as a civic duty: the price of living in a society that affords me protection and support.Vera Mont

    That is a pretty good explanation of why I want to avoid "love".

    There came a time in my life when I realized respect is much more important than love. Abusive people can "love" those they abuse and this would not happen if they respected the other person and didn't feel justified in being abusive. I got this from a couple of guys I lived with and their military understanding of respect. Somehow I had lost awareness of the reasoning for respect that I grew up with. Perhaps it was all those dopey songs about love and hormones that led to intimate behaviors and our Puritan thinking about morality. Like it isn't sinful if it is love, right? So we take the abuse and take the abuse because we "love" the abuser. :vomit: Only humans will stay in bad relationships because of the concept of love.

    Compassion is also important. The golden rule, do unto others as you would have them do to you. I would not have taken in the man I took in last winter, except, I thought that could be me and how awful would be if I could not figure out how to get housing or get assistance and no one helped me. By the way, this man had a major stroke and is now in long-term care, unable to communicate or get out of bed.

    Back to love. Love is a feeling and feelings change and change. We should not base our decisions on our emotions.
  • Culture is critical
    ???? So why do you choose to help strangers who seem unable to help themselves?universeness

    I love your question. I question myself and realize I regret not helping some people in the past because they are as deserving as those I have helped lately. I think the difference in my judgment is the result of having more physical and memory problems myself. This awareness of how hard it can be for physically or mentally impaired people (including children) comes from experience and this is lacking in a young population. When we have never experienced a problem, we expect others to do what we can do. We expect a lot of children! Perhaps our expectations of ourselves and others are too high?

    I help others because it is the right thing to do. You know, the bottom line is, "Do unto others as you would have them do to you". It is not about who they are and I don't want what I do taken as a personal relationship thing. I see myself more like a nurse who takes care of a wound and then moves on to the next patient, than a loving person.

    Emotions change and change, but being virtuous hopefully is not so changeable. I think we need to do things that are the right thing to do. In the 60s we said, "If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem". This is the only way to have a better life. The better we make life, the greater the chances are of us having good lives. That is reason, right?
  • Culture is critical
    This is a really promising group as well guys:
    Citizens Network
    Maybe they would particularly help support the work you do Athena.
    This is their North American sub-group:
    Citizens Network, North America
    universeness

    Thank you universes. The link seems concerned with love and I am not into love but you did inspire me to Google for an organization that is about civics education. I signed up for their newsletter. It is hard for me to stay focused but I think what concerns me most is protecting our democracy with education.

    https://www.civiced.org/
  • Culture is critical
    recently became a member of a UK group called 'Compass,' who describe themselves as politically progressive and seek common ground/cause, regardless of which current political party you support.
    I joined them because of their strong stance and efforts in support of UBI (and their stance on many other issues). I thought you both might find the following 'New Settlement,' campaign, hopeful, in the sense that, 'there are groups out there,' who imo, are trying to make life for the average human, a better experience. What do you think of:
    universeness

    That information goes with the book "The Necessary Revolution- How Individuals and Organizations Are Working Together to Create a Sustainable World." By Peter Senge, Bryan Smith, Nina Kruschwita, Joe Laur, Sara Schley.

    In that book, there is an explanation that goes well with an understanding of the Democratic Model for Industry. Include everyone in the task of solving problems. This has made the impossible possible because some Industries have made big promises such as conserving water, that they had no idea how they would keep. By turning the problem over to everyone the company got the benefit of group consciousness, the very thing that makes Democracy better than authoritarian Nations. Well, it helps to have education for Democracy to make it work the way it should.

    Knowing what can be done, such as organizing for world war one by relying on schools to teach students necessary technological skills for the first time in our history, and a frame of mind the Spartans would admire, I totally believe we can turn things around. But we need respected leaders and respected reporters who can get us working together. Having media that caters to popular opinion and sensationalism, is a disaster and I don't think those problems will change without education for democracy and being united with shared values.

    Having the actual housing so people can experience that housing and see how it is working, is more powerful than just words, so kudos for that advancement. I now wonder if something like that is happening in my community. Participating with others in coming up with solutions would be better than sitting alone at home wringing my hands and feeling totally powerless.
  • Moral relativism in defining a 'good death'
    I generally agree with your sentiment there Athena, especially when talking about the relationship with medicine and death. My personal opinion on the matter is that death has become too medicalised, and this striving of society towards prolonging life at all costs is generally detrimental to those involved. Planning death, in my opinion, does not necessarily mean shortening life, but it does allow people to create their own narrative around death, and have more autonomy over how they die.AlexMcGram

    Thank you so much for that agreement. Added to my concern is the difference money makes. If I could afford retirement living that cost a few thousand dollars monthly, I would be assured of having the best life money can provide. People I know can not afford that and they are struggling to manage without help as they lose their strength, energy, eyesight, and hearing. I am mindful of what I eat and I swim almost daily and work out in a gym to rebuild the strength I have lost because of inactivity. I am fighting to maintain my independence. This is about quality of life, right? But-

    I keep thinking especially of one elderly neighbor who did not like family holidays when her family insisted she be present even though she was losing her vision and could not hear well enough to participate in discussions. She was an amazing woman but I do not want to experience life in that way because even though she was in the room with family, she felt isolated.

    I cared for people with Alzheimer's and ALS. I do not want to lose my independence and this is especially a problem for those without money. We leave severely disabled people on the streets or isolated in apartments that get filthy because someone has lost the ability to maintain a home. They have called for help but there are not enough people nor enough money to meet the demand for help. Then we comfort ourselves by believing the homeless people want to be homeless and it probably is their own fault because of drugs. My Medical Care Provider is a very nice person but she is not in touch with reality. We do not live happily ever after and we might want to take that into consideration.

    If we could set the boundaries of how bad is bad enough, we could risk being alive longer than we want but now we get into the fear of the state killing off people who are no longer useful. This is not pleasant to think about but as our numbers increase we may need to think about how to deal with reality. Just ignoring reality is not a solution.
  • Moral relativism in defining a 'good death'
    Our deaths affect those who are close to us and possibly the future and perhaps the whole of society that is based on social agreements. Many years ago I contemplated suicide and thought I would have to take others with me so they did not experience the pain of my death, and then I thought I had to take those associated with the people closest to me so they would not experience the pain of the deaths of those closest to me. Like the circle of people I would have to take with me just got bigger and bigger and I realized I could not undo my life. I could not not exist because we are all connected. At which point, I decided I could not take my own life so I better figure out how to make my life the best it can be.

    However, this is many years later and my family has agreed euthanasia is okay when we have a condition that will sooner or later end our lives. Now the thought is what is a good life and then when that good life is not possible, what is a good death?

    I want to go before I become a burden on others because of something like dementia or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. I do not want to be blind and deaf and forced to sit through family gatherings because they want to know I am loved. Now this is very problematic because the death would have to happen before it was too late for me to execute my own exit. In Oregon, we have the right to die, but this does not mean we can plan our deaths like we plan a wedding. I wish we could plan our deaths like we plan a wedding. I think the individual's death should be up to the individual and God (whatever god is) and that government should stay out of our final decision. None of us are going to get out of dying. It happens to all of us and what could be more important than how we manage this?

    Next problem. I think we should maintain the courage to live as long as we have quality of life and that we should leave an explanation of our death if we so chose to end our lives. Oh, brother, is that a difficult thing to do! At least it is for me. What do I want my last communication with those closest to me to be? This is the future I am thinking about. How will my thoughts and actions affect those I leave behind and their children?

    If we had planned deaths might that make it easier to have good closers with everyone concerned? A planned death would mean tieing up all the loose ends and not ending our lives perhaps years earlier than need be in fear that if we wait too long, we will become burdens on others and suffer a long time before we are finally released. What is the good life?

    What is a good death? I think everyone I know agrees that means a fast and painless death. Like go to bed happy and just not wake up. How wise is it to deny that to anyone? I am at that time in life where I wonder, do I want all the tests and medicine that is about keeping me alive or should I make peace with my life and death and let nature take its course without doing things to extend my life? In case you miss the point- preventing me from planning my death means making decisions to avoid extending my life.
  • Culture is critical
    At least the American military boot industry is thriving! Unfortunately, 'we' have already supplied a great many weapons to the chosen of that other god, A---h, whose will runs contrary, while the blessed of Mao can make their own.Vera Mont

    Perhaps the subject of gods and war would be interesting. I think if we look at all the religions we can see why an education limited to studying one holy book just is not enough. We are being bombard now with the wrongs of our Christian nation and appalling human abuses, and some Muslim countries also have a bad record. I don't know if there ever was a country that could not be found quilty of human violations?

    I know such things are tied to culture and that cultures are learned. I would like to know what should people learn and how should that be taught?
  • Culture is critical
    Nor has the disparity of wealth. I wonder whether there's a connection. Is it really because a cycle rickshaw operator has six kids to feed that the rivers are poisoned? And do those six kids really use up twice as much of the world's resources as three of Walton's? Is it the extra child soldiers and slaves
    The trafficking of children for domestic labor in the U.S. is an extension of an illegal practice in Africa. Families send their daughters to work for money and the opportunity to escape a dead-end life.
    that contribute more to glaciers melting, or the trafficking of vast amounts of goods to well-off consumers?
    Of the ten biggest strip mines in South and Central America, three are owned by South American interests; the rest belong to investors from Canada, the US, UK, Mexico and Australia. Beef farming is a great investment for North Americans: apparently, there is still 'undeveloped' land in Paraguay, and it won't be wasted on local people eating well. https://www.gatewaytosouthamerica-newsblog.com/cattle-ranching-in-paraguay-an-investors-perspective/
    Vera Mont

    Should we talk about education and democracy? How about the good of Christianity? We all know God has favorite people and we are them. What is your problem with this reality? God blesses us because we please him, and it is not our fault the rest of the world is not as pleasing to God. And by gosh, we need to have the military weapons and a base on the moon, so we can do the will the God, and prevent the evil enemies who are jealous of us, from doing anything that might be against the will of God. :wink:
  • Culture is critical
    So, don't make that trade. We don't really need oil from Iraq. How many lives has that little transaction cost, so far? How much in money and resources? (That's a bare outline, with no mention of what's been going on behind the arras.)

    But Chinese women and Indian children and African men work twice as hard for a tenth of the pay, and their governments, sufficiently lubricated with bribes, are not too fussy about what you spill on the way out. So all the garden gnomes come from China and the American Guild of Gnome Crafters is sleeping on the street.
    Vera Mont

    Glad you got past my word mistake. That was a dumb mistake. :roll:

    I am also glad you seem to know more about the trade problem than most. The reason geologists know a lot about the problem is they are in those countries finding the resources and estimating how much is available so a price for removing them can be established. They study geology because it is interesting to them, and then they get jobs that seem interesting and after they are caught in the web, they gain an understanding of the problems such as the ones you talk about and their conscience begins to eat them up.

    I don't think there is anyone to blame for our mass ignorance but if you want to be part of the cure, please spread the knowledge. In the1920s the price of gas was skyrocketing and this was an economic problem. A small article in the back pages of a newspaper warned, "Given our know oil supply and rate of consumption, we are headed for economic trouble and possibly war". The stock market crashed and the world went to war. We are totally ignorant of why this happened.

    What can be done about that ignorance? Should someone be held responsible for our mass ignorance? Democrats starting with President Carter have talked about the resource/consumption problem while the oil companies lied to us and especially Republican leaders tell us the lies and maintain the ignorance. What can we do about this?

    While the majority in the US seems to disapprove of :gasp: socialism and government subsidizing poorly paid workers but are in favor of subsidizing Industry and keeping the product cheap by keeping labor cheap, we do benefit from cheap labor. We buy the cheap products made by slave labor and put our own Industry out of business. This is how economies have grown. The condition of the working class in Britain was so bad the majority of military-age males were unfit for the military. When Industry was asked to pay higher wages, it argued they could not compete in world markets if they paid the labor more. This began Britians subsiding the poor.

    Germany was far ahead of the rest of us with education for technology for everyone, a national pension plan, worker's compensation, and national health insurance. Oil is essential to national defense and Industrial economies and the competition for control of world resources is greater than it has ever been with modern warfare being far more destructive than it was during WWII. What should be done about this?