But be that as it may, the moral thing to do would be to cut one's losses and make the right decision anyway. Better late than never. Let the people who want to play that game figure it out among themselves. — Tzeentch
There's a perfectly moral option available to him: extract himself from this rotten game of states, and search for greener, less homicidal pastures. — Tzeentch
But if my consciousness itself is simulated, then the simulation argument requires that consciousness is computational, a point I strenuously disagree with, with Penrose and Searle on my side. — fishfry
That's one of my objections to simulation theory. The "progress in video games" argument" fails. We've made no progress in simulating consciousness. — fishfry
It's very simple. You tend to teach your kids this: two wrongs don't make a right.
So no. I would never commit to war crimes or torture for that matter. If a gas attack could defeat them, then there are also other ways available. Those may cost more lives on our side but at least e survive with our humanity in tact. — Benkei
It is interesting that as soon as the ancient earth was ready to sustain primitive life, life got started right away. — EnPassant
If committing war crimes against people that use war crimes as an everyday weapon is the only viable method of stopping them from continuing their evil ways, then fucking well stop them. — Sir2u
If there were life on millions or billions of planets and we were somehow able to study the evolution of life on all those planets, would we even then be able to show whether or not evolution is "directed"? — Janus
Since any putative "director" logically must exist outside the system to be directed, and thus beyond our capacity to detect it, I think the more relevant question is as to whether we have any good reason to think evolution is directed. — Janus
Possibly? But who would be so foolish to become a prime minister if what they aspired to was living a moral life? — Tzeentch
The answer is no.
First of, the question of justification is a moral one, and therefore should be understood on the appropriate level; that of the moral agent - the individual.
So lets take the individual Winston Churchill.
Winston had many options open to him besides authorizing the killing of thousands.
For example, he could have foregone a career in politics and lived out his life in contemplative seclusion.
An infinitely more preferable and just option than having the blood of thousands on one's hands. — Tzeentch
Good to see you are consistent with your views that the Germans were justified in all their war decisions. — Lionino
The targeted murder of thousands of civilians was justified? — Lionino
If socialism wants to be effective at reducing poverty, it should focus on creating jobs and keeping the prices of basic needs low. — Tzeentch
I am stating US elections are full of holes, 2020 included. — Lionino
I am not insinuating, I am stating US elections are full of holes, 2020 included. — Lionino
No, for the second time, I didn't say that, as you can verify since I never wrote anything like that. For future reference, I don't have an agenda when it comes to things that don't concern me, I say it how it is. — Lionino
you're the one who made the claim. — Barkon
Minds/consciousness can't come from matter, therefore simulation theory is false.
— RogueAI
How do you prove that? — Benj96
It seems at the very least, matter is the carrier medium of consciousness. A necessity. If not the source.
The problem is the first step, whether we think a piece of evidence is good or not is another belief and thus not voluntary. — Lionino
I'm not sure what the "cult" thing is about. In any case, if you're not choosing your choice to change beliefs, then it's like that change just happened — flannel jesus
Right, but not a choice to make that choice. So... you made a choice to do some thing, but you didn't make a choice to choose to do that thing. The choice just kinda... happened to you? — flannel jesus
If it was a choice, was there a conscious choice to make that choice? — flannel jesus