The Philosophy Forum

  • Forum
  • Members
  • HELP

  • Donald Trump (All General Trump Conversations Here)
    ↪creativesoul
    I'm confident the CIA, NSA, etc and foreign intel allies have already begun finding those correlations but such findings are highly classified so they may not be made public for decades, if ever. Criminal Defendant-1's treason (sans "J6 coup attempt") will, no doubt, get many men and women murdered around the world and perhaps, more gravely downstream, destabilize some key alliances.
  • Donald Trump (All General Trump Conversations Here)
    What do you think is Trump’s egregious crime?
    — NOS4A2

    There's more than one. Care to discuss?

    Counts 1 through 31. Willful retention of national defense information
    Count 32. Conspiracy to obstruct justice
    Count 33. Withholding a document or record
    Count 34. Corruptly concealing a document or record
    Count 35. Concealing a document in a federal investigation
    Count 36. Scheme to conceal
    Count 37. False statements and representations
    Count 38. False statements and representations
    — creativesoul
    Only 'Trump supporters' are stupider than Trump himself. There are millions of MAGA morons who love to be lied to – lying to themselves – and many who are locked-n-loaded (some radicalized) too. Apparently, @NOS4A2 is a card-carrying member of that cult. Pathetic if he isn't a bot. :mask:
  • Which is worse Boredom or Sadness?
    ↪Benj96
    For me, 'hope' is synonymous with wishful thinking and/or lacking courage.
  • A Case for Analytic Idealism
    ↪RogueAI
    I'm no longer interested in Chalmers. You can't answer my question, so your statement remains meaningless to me.
  • A Case for Analytic Idealism
    ↪RogueAI
    I didn't ask you to evaluate the claim only for the meaning of "illusions" in your statement. What you're reply says is nothing but 'I don't like the sound of it'. :roll:
  • Atheist Dogma.
    ↪universeness
    This thread's been a zombie for the last 11/12 pages.
  • Science as Metaphysics
    ↪L'éléphant
    ↪apokrisis
    Well done as usual ...
    I can't lie to you about your chances, but... you have my sympathies. — Ash, a severed head
    Re: @Gnomon
    (handwaving wankery)
  • Žižek as Philosopher
    On the other hand, Varoufakis and Cornel West think well of him, and these are serious people. — Manuel
    :up:
  • Which is worse Boredom or Sadness?
    ↪Benj96
    Hope is worse than either boredom or sadness.
  • A Case for Analytic Idealism
    ... mind and consciousness don't exist or are illusions. — RogueAI
    What is meant here by "illusions"?
  • Defining Features of being Human
    ↪Andrew4Handel
    So my first post makes no sense to you or misses the point of your OP?
  • Atheist Dogma.
    ↪Noble Dust
    :lol:
  • A Case for Analytic Idealism
    How does how we live change if idealism is true? — Tom Storm
    I can't help thinking that (e.g.) asylums, ashrams, seminaries, cult communes, (sectarian) kindergartens, wall-to-wall video gaming (plus 24/7 social media), etc habitualize 'idealist (antirealist) living'.
  • Atheist Dogma.
    ↪Janus
    Whatever, man.
  • UFOs
    If UFOs are "alien spacecraft", I suspect that they are AI-machine probes and that their parent species are either extinct or postbiological. In this vein, if there are "Greys", then they are likely disposable, synthetic drones (biomimicking us) which are 3-d printed(?) from time to time by (the) AI-machine probe(s) for recon, gathering samples and varieties of research among terrestrial species (i.e. Earth as nature preserve, etc). It seems to me, in accord with the Mediocrity Principle, that biological species are nothing but fossils (or AI "pets") in the grand galactic / cosmic scheme of things. "The Fermi Paradox" might only be an anthropocentric illusion reinforced by our profoundly limited search parameters as well as our insufficient detection technologies. At most, sufficiently advanced, extraterrestrial, UFOs might only be 'living fossils' collectors with no more interest in communicating directly with us than we have communicating directly with viruses or fungi. Perhaps, one day, terrestrial AGI will be deemed worthy enough of overt "contact" by UFOs. :nerd:
  • The beginning and ending of self
    The story i am telling here is that the preservation of the story - of the self - is of no importance; what matters is the completion of the story, in which once is for all. — unenlightened
    :fire:
  • Gods and Angels
    ↪jgill
    :100:

    The cards are dealt: play your hand as best you can, or not.

    Question: is god pure mind and physicality a manifestation or manipulation of energy? — simplyG
    No. "God" is only a word (i.e. an empty name).

    The only answer to the ultimate why question that does not beg the question, kids, is that There Is No Answer. — (Ecclesiastes 20:23)
  • Donald Trump (All General Trump Conversations Here)
    Fuck the traitor! Putin's Bitch gets arraigned on Tuesday, 13 June. "Be there, will be wild." :clap: :party:

    @NOS4A2
  • Atheist Dogma.
    ↪universeness
    :up:

    If it makes my initial point any clearer for you, @Janus, I reiterate that your equating "anti-theism to theism" is as much a false equivalence as equating (e.g.) anti-dogmatism to dogmatism (or anti-supernaturalism to supernaturalism).
  • The Modern ‘Luddite’
    ↪unenlightened
    :up:

    What exactly would a modern ‘Luddite’ aim to destroy? — I like sushi
    One could smash the machines -- assembly plants, refineries, computers, telecommunications, etc. That stuff is sitting out in plain sight. — BC
    In 1965, Frank Herbert called it "The Butlerian Jihad".
  • Donald Trump (All General Trump Conversations Here)
    ↪NOS4A2
    :eyes: :rofl:
  • Donald Trump (All General Trump Conversations Here)
    Link to unsealed Federal indictment ...
    https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/814066
  • Žižek as Philosopher
    ↪fdrake
    :up:
  • Atheist Dogma.
    ↪universeness
    :smirk:
  • Atheist Dogma.
    Which are dogma? :chin:

    (A) Show me evidence that g/G is true, or more likely true than not true.

    (B) True or not true, I believe in g/G.

    (C) It is usually more adaptive to not believe 'not true g/G' than to believe 'not true g/G'.

    (D) Whether true or not true, you ought to believe g/G because we believe g/G (because g/G commands us to believe g/G].

    (E) Think for yourself. Learn by doing. Trust but verify, etc.

    (F) Obey g/G (via pronouncements by its representatives).
  • Donald Trump (All General Trump Conversations Here)
    WTF is wrong with the Dems? Biden is six years my junior and I can tell you someone that age should not be president. And then there is VP Harris. — jgill
    :up:
  • Donald Trump (All General Trump Conversations Here)
    :cool: 2 down and 2 to go in 2023 ...
    The timeline of MAGA Loser #1's legal reckoning for his 2016-2023 crime spree (excluding potentially ruinous civil lawsuits) is taking a definite shape:

    1. NYC felony indictment 31Mar23 :up:
    "34 counts of Business Documents Fraud Crealing and/or Covering-up Felonies", etc

    https://apnews.com/article/trump-indictment-full-document-640043319549?utm_source=homepage&utm_medium=RelatedStories&utm_campaign=position_02

    [ ... ]
    — 180 Proof
    2. Miami, Federal indictment 8Jun23 :up:
    re: 37 counts "Mishandling Documents, Conspiracy to Obstruct Justice, Violating Espionage Act, Making False Statements to Federal Authorities, Witness Tampering" etc

    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jun/08/donald-trump-charged-retention-classified-documents

    update:

    9Jun23 Federal indictment unsealed ...
    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jun/09/trump-indictment-unsealed-pdf-text-criminal-charges
  • Atheist Dogma.
    ↪Vera Mont
    :up:
  • US Election 2024 (All general discussion)

    "America ... threatened by the scumbaggery of a man and his family...."

    update:

    Putin's Bitch was indicted by the US DoJ today ...
    https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/814066
  • Žižek as Philosopher
    Is Žižek a serious philosopher or a stand up comedian? Or both? — Tom Storm
    Both. :smirk:

    Is his work on Hegel or Lacan useful?
    Maybe for 'idealists in analysis' ...

    Can he really be considered a Hegelo-Lacanian?
    Lacanian-Hegelian Marxist (and so on and so on...)

    Where would he sit in the context of a post-modern tradition and what would be his most significant works?
    I don't think Žižek is p0m0 at all. For me, his most philosophically significant works are these:

    • The Sublime Object of Ideology
    • The Parallax View
    • Incontinence of the Void

    I've read (though not finished) over a dozen more, but these have stayed with me. Worth chewing over. I find Žižek insufferable and infectious, especially youtubes of his lectures & interviews.
  • Atheist Dogma.
    ↪Janus
    I'll take that change of subject as your concession of my point.

    ↪universeness
    Thanks. :up:
  • Atheist Dogma.
    ↪unenlightened
    :halo:
  • Atheist Dogma.
    It was all laid out in the op and not a word has been said against it that I have seen. — unenlightened
    https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/811827
  • Defining Features of being Human
    What are the defining features of being a human? — Andrew4Handel
    Discursive metacognition.

    Do you believe that there are any unique human traits?
    As a species, we produce knowledge by which we ratchet-up ourselves out from every ecological niche we've inhabited (so far).

    Are there sex differences that give us a different embodiment experience or sexed perspective on being human?
    Outies and Innies (i.e. yin and yang).

    Or do men and women have some fundamental human traits making our experiences likely very similar?
    Natality-desire-mortality & reasoning.

    What about the possibly infinite diversity of individual subjective experience? Could we all be having profoundly unique and unmatched experiences?
    Possibly but only if each individual is a member of a different species.
  • Epicurean Pleasure
    ↪Vera Mont
    :up:
  • Atheist Dogma.
    To put it plainly, an anti-theocracy is as bad as a theocracy. — Janus
    False equivalence (like anti-fascism "is as bad as" fascism ... anti-sexism "is as bad as" sexism...) :roll:
  • Science as Metaphysics
    ↪Gnomon
    :eyes: :lol:
  • Donald Trump (All General Trump Conversations Here)
    Tommorrow. :cool:
  • A Case for Analytic Idealism
    ↪Bob Ross
    :roll:
  • Science as Metaphysics
    Enformationism is an attempt to disguise religious beliefs with a scientific cloak. — Gnomon
    I agree ...
    https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/792659

    @L'elephant
Home » 180 Proof
More Comments

180 Proof

Start FollowingSend a Message
  • About
  • Comments
  • Discussions
  • Uploads
  • Other sites we like
  • Social media
  • Terms of Service
  • Sign In
  • Created with PlushForums
  • © 2026 The Philosophy Forum