-
The CogitoCaveat: dubito, dubitans accidit. :smirk:
Yes, "the subject" is what an object does and, as Spinoza suggests, a complementary way of attributing-describing an object's predicates. In other words, "for itself" is only a kind – phase transition – of "in itself" (pace Sartre).Descartes’ mistake: the subject isn’t as much a different substance than the object, as it is differently conditioned than an object.
(2020)
https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/539399 -
US Election 2024 (All general discussion)Maybe that explains why non-MAGA cultists voted for The Clown but does not explain why about 7 million Democratic voters who had voted for Biden in 2020 did not vote for Harris (or The Clown) this year.
Maybe. :smirk:Or... maybe I'm full of shit and we are all fucked. — Fooloso4 -
US Election 2024 (All general discussion)Yes, assuming this post-election autopsy is correct:
https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/946060 -
US Election 2024 (All general discussion)18Nov24
I'm not mad at MAGAs, a majority of white women and "low information" citizens for again voting for The Clown. Instead, I'm pissed at the ten-plus million of Dems who didn't bother to vote for the second time in 8 years (2 out of the last 3 general elections) most likely because the Dem candidate for president was female.
Lesson: (If I'm not profoundly mistaken) many working class, non-college educated men & women would rather not vote than vote for an "Alpha Woman" to be POTUS.
So will the DNC learn this lesson? :mask:
I doubt it ... TBD. -
A Secular Look At Religion
There isn't any significant anthropological evidence of "religion" before ca. 50-80,000 years ago (i.e. before the Upper Paleolithic era)¹ in a period – the Lower Paleolithic era – when "evolutionary" pressures might have still been at work on (modern)² H. sapiens, so your notion of "beneficial", Brendan, does not make sense in this context. Evolution has nothing to do with it insofar as "religion" has only been operative – manifest – via cultural development for about the last 2% of the entire existence of the Homo genus (2.8 million years).I meant "beneficial" in the evolutionary sense — Brendan Golledge
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prehistoric_religion [1]
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behavioral_modernity [2] -
A Secular Look At Religion
:roll: At best, sir, this premise does not make any sense (re: "common" therefore "beneficial"? like e.g. poor hygiene, bigotry, sex/child abuse, theft/fraud, bullshit/lies, ignorance, superstitions, scapegoating, conspiracy theories, war, poverty, etc) "Religion" is a cultural phenomenon, imo, symptomatic of human commons afflicted by both material scarcity & biological morbidity; my guess is 'post-scarcity¹, immorbid² persons' will not be in any recognizable (Bronze/Iron Age) sense "religious" (i.e. magical thinkers).Anything that's common must be good at existing in one way or another, or else it would not exist. So, since religion is common amongst humans, it must serve some beneficial purpose, ... — Brendan Golledge
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-scarcity [1]
https://healthylongevitychallenge.org/the-quest-for-immorbidity-what-if-you-could-live-a-long-life-disease-free/ [2] -
US Election 2024 (All general discussion):up:
e.g. Dune.Monarchy is a very robust form of government, even more so when linked to a state religion. We'll pretty much all go back to monarchies as climate change sets in. Democracy is just a tool. It's not a good in itself. — frank -
A Secular Look At Religion
Yes, magical thinking in performative forms of woo-of-the-gaps superstitions, immortality fantasies, folk/fairy tales, etc – no doubt the childhood of our species. :sparkle:religion's intrinsic, cultural, or existential significance — Wayfarer -
US Election 2024 (All general discussion)
:up:Biological men should not be in women's sports. — RogueAI -
With philosophy, poetry and politics on my mind...Re: The Myth of Siayphus by A. Camus; also, section 2.5 (esp. re: Camus) of the SEP article "Hope" ...
Same reason anyone wears "lipstick".Why 'lipstick'? With its female connotation?
I used it to paraphrase the old (American?) saying 'lipstick on a pig'. :kiss: -
With philosophy, poetry and politics on my mind...:chin: Denying "the nightmare" – e.g. prayers in foxholes – 'nostalgia' (philosophical suicide) to evade the absurd (re: disorder, uncertainty, catastrophe, transience, loss, death). Sorry, more Camus ...
-
I know the advancement of AI is good, but it's ruined myself and out look on things"AI" cannot harm our species – retard our development, sabotage our potential – more than we have harmed (and continue to harm) ourselves in so many ways. Imo, "AI" offers a possibility, however improbable, of slowing down (or even once and for all breaking) civilization-scale "boom-n-bust" cycles: not "utopia" but posthumanity (i.e. agency sans scarcity-conditions (via automated metacognition ("AGI")). It seems to me that we're now living through either the Anthropocene-ending chrysalis ... or a gradual extinction-event (e.g. global burning, autocratic / theocratic populisms, WMD proliferation, etc). Unless we're too late, building "AI" is the Copernican Revolution – "the last human invention". :fire:
-
Donald Trump (All General Trump Conversations Here)
:monkey:And into the china shop, walks the bull. — Wayfarer -
Earth's evolution contains ethical principles:up: :up:
Here's a topic-adjecent discussion ...
https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/904662 -
Donald Trump (All General Trump Conversations Here)
As always, comrade, I keep on laughing to keep from crying. I'm not a left-wingnut accelerationist but ... we're so fucked. :cry: :sweat:Don't know whether to laugh or cry. But probably the latter. — Wayfarer -
US Election 2024 (All general discussion)21Jan25: MAGA¹ America officially becomes an oligarchic (corporatist) kakistocracy.²
https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/945323 [1]
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kakistocracy [2] -
With philosophy, poetry and politics on my mind...
Consider again the sections featuring Aristotle, Spinoza & Camus in the SEP article on Hope –I don't have a full understanding of this and what it means for you. This conception of 'courage sans hope'. — Amity
e.g. "Sisyphus" endlessly rolling his philosopher's stone; casualties making love in the trenches and raising children in foxholes; the homeless singing the blues to momentarily chase away blue devils...
"You must go on. I can't go on. I'll go on."
"Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better."
:fire: -
US Election 2024 (All general discussion)2024: Sometimes the sheeple vote for wolves instead of sheepdogs.
e.g. 53% of White women again chose a "Your Body, My Choice" misogynist by playing the "White Power" (MAGA) race card.
addendum to:
https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/945715
@Amity @Mikie @Benkei @Maw @Wayfarer @Fooloso4 @Vera Mont @Baden -
With philosophy, poetry and politics on my mind...
Thanks. :up:
Fwiw, my conception of courage sans hope is primarily indebted to Aristotle, Spinoza & Camus (as well as e.g. Laozi, Epicurus, Epictetus, P. Zapffe, F. Kafka, S. Beckett, C. Rosset, A. Murray ... who aren't mentioned in the article) and grounded in lived experience.
:death: :flower: -
With philosophy, poetry and politics on my mind...:up: :up:
From 2023 ...
Yeah, in 2024 that "1 way to lose" will be the same as 2016: HRC. The Dems don't learn new tricks often ... though maybe VP Harris :yikes: (if Biden drops out of the race and the Dems don't nominate e.g. Gov Newsom, Gov Whitmer, et al) – HRC redux. — 180 Proof -
With philosophy, poetry and politics on my mind...There is no time for despair, no place for self-pity, no need for silence, no room for fear. We speak, we write, we do language. That is how civilizations heal. I know the world is bruised and bleeding, and though it is important not to ignore its pain, it is also critical to refuse to succumb to its malevolence. Like failure, chaos contains information that can lead to knowledge even wisdom. Like art. — Toni Morrison
addendum to
https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/946060 -
US Election 2024 (All general discussion)
-
Donald Trump (All General Trump Conversations Here)
No doubt he does because the majority of "poorly educated" (+ reality tv, WWE & social media-brain addled) US voters love "Trump". :eyes: :mask:I LOVE THE POORLY EDUCATED. — President-elect Trump, 6Nov24 -
Writing stylesCite some representative samples of my "unclear" "jargon laden style and weird grammatically abbreviated sentences". Thanks.
-
Post-mortem poll: for Republican or against Democrat?Apparently US voters dislike the Biden economy and the prospect of a female president more than they dislike a 'corrupt, incompetent, con artist, racist, rapist, misogynist, nativist-xenophobe-isolationist, hyper-protectionist, insurrectionist, autocrat & convicted fraudster'. :brow:
-
US Election 2024 (All general discussion)
:up: :up:Any chance of success went out the window in 2021, when the 3.5 trillion dollar Bernie-backed reconciliation bill was killed by Manchin and Sinema. That would have been very good for the country. Instead we got crumbs and some baby steps in climate policy. Not good enough, not impactful enough. — Mikie -
With philosophy, poetry and politics on my mind...
I don't agree. Imo, Trump won because too many Democratic voters preferred not to vote rather than vote for a woman president just like in 2016. Biden won 15 million more votes in 2020 than Clinton won in 2016 and 13 million more votes than Harris won this year; however, Trump received about 1 million less than he did in 2020, so the election turnout drop-off was on the Dems side. As far as I can tell, too many Americans are still not "ready" for a woman president. :brow:A question for 180 Proof and any others - how much would you agree that there was too much emphasis and reliance on women votes re abortion? — Amity -
TPF Quote CabinetThe fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt. — Bertrand Russell
As democracy is perfected, the office of the President represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day, the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last, and the White House will be occupied by a downright fool and a complete narcissistic moron. — H.L. Mencken
In politics, stupidity is not a handicap. — Napoleon Bonaparte
What a terrible era in which idiots govern the blind. — William Shakespeare
addendum to
https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/945412 -
A Mind Without the PerceptibleIf the g/G of "classical theism" is eternal, then its "ideas" are also eternal, and therefore whatever exists – "whatever it perceives to be" – is also eternal from g/G's pov (even though from a not-g/G (e.g. human) pov whatever exists seems temporal (which is a "stubbornly persistent illusion" according to A. Einstein)). So, imo, refuting Berkeley does not itself refute "classical theism" (vide Spinoza / Epicurus).
Btw, I'm a p-naturalist (i.e. anti-supernaturalist ... anti-antirealist) with a speculative affinity for pandeism. -
Withdrawal is the answer to most axiological problems concerning humans
Reply intelligently to this post↪180 Proof
Leave me alone. Fuck off — schopenhauer1
https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/944417
and I (probably) will.
180 Proof
Start FollowingSend a Message
- Other sites we like
- Social media
- Terms of Service
- Sign In
- Created with PlushForums
- © 2025 The Philosophy Forum