Just removed instructions for recording episodes of Yellowjackets on Showtime. Ghastly.

Lots of WFH people will be returning to the workplace society simply to be around their fellows. I am a retired prof and a colleague of mine who has been teaching online from our university is relieved, even delighted to return to the classroom. He was on the verge of retiring.

↪Enrique
I've labored within the social service industry and have observed various kinds of problems. What I have not seen first hand is anything like the kind of behavior you ascribe to doctors — Bitter Crank

I've been a US citizen for 84 years and have never seen the sort of narrative you describe, Enrique. But I'm not saying it doesn't exist. Are you a US citizen? What I have seen are the horrors of guardianship laws that allow companies to take over an individual's assets while supplying minimal support. This varies with states.

but what if these citizens are actually being effectively abducted into group home or low income neighborhood situations while commonly drugged by a predatory medical establishment and forced to assert that they have an incurable ailment, in essence ostracized to various degrees by their communities? — Enrique

This seems like a pretty big assumption. Maybe you could flesh it out a bit by citing a country, then giving some examples. Otherwise, your comments are speculative.

A point in 7-D: (x,y,z,u,v,w,t)

I doubt matter underlying the wave function ever fully collapses, as if an absolute demarcation between coherence and decoherence exists, but rather morphs into different shapes and formations depending . . . — Enrique

Are you speaking of a matter wave or a probability wave in QM? Kenosha Kid is probably out making millions with his guitar rather than really important work like clarifying physics on this forum. :sad:

Will one of you logicians write out in English the defining expressions for abstract objects at the beginning of this article from Stanford? This seems to form the basis of Stanford's Metaphysical Laboratory.

Theory of Abstract Objects

Edit: OK, it looks like there is an explanation of sorts in the article. If you don't feel it's worth the effort I might agree.

Lots of extra dimensions in math - one just defines them. So Tegmark's Mathematical Universe Hypothesis implies all sorts of things.

A touch of humor from Quora Digest a few days ago, apparently a joke that's been around for awhile in academia: The dean, when asked for funding for the physics department which requested a new particle accelerator and other expensive equipment said, "Why don't you guys do like the math department and ask for a pen, sheets of blank paper, and a wastebasket? Or. better yet, like the philosophy department that asked only for a few sheets of blank paper and a wastebasket?" :cool:

I got my union card in math in 1971 and was fortunate to get hired in a developing department in a state college that was beginning to grow to becoming a branch of the state university. The job suited me, not requiring research but rewarding it when it was done. Full professor in less than a decade, and a short stint as department chair.

I cannot imagine such opportunities exist today. My timing was very fortunate. I am saddened to know that young academics have so few paths available.

Thanks. A couple of quotes from the article:

"Physically, we don’t have a 4D spatial system, but we can access 4D quantum Hall physics using this lower-dimensional system because the higher-dimensional system is coded in the complexity of the structure.”

“Right now, those experiments are still far from any useful application,” he said. Yet, physics in the 4th dimension could be influencing our 3D world. As for applications Rechtsman said, “Maybe we can come up with new physics in the higher dimension and then design devices that take advantage the higher-dimensional physics in lower dimensions.”

The second paragraph is intriguing. A couple of weeks ago Gravitty - before he was banned - made another thought-provoking comment when he said that light does not travel in time.

I think physicists have shown with experimentation strong evidence that a 4th spacial dimension may exist — TiredThinker

No kidding? — jgill

A link would suffice.

I think physicists have shown with experimentation strong evidence that a 4th spacial dimension may exist — TiredThinker

No kidding?

Academia tries to firm up the ectoplasm called metaphysics:

Metaphysical Resarch Lab

Theory of Abstract Objects

Metaphysics of Science

From my perspective (as one of Leibniz's many, many professional descendants), I think of infinitesimals when thinking of Leibniz. He made many contributions to math, but an infinitesimal lies within the definition of metaphysics for me.

Sorry to interrupt a lively discussion.

:up:

Marco confided he has a masters in physics. With all the pseudo-scientific babble here about collapsing the wave function, superposition, entanglement, etc. I thought it worthwhile to have a genuine physicist on board. Kenosha Kid was excellent, but he hasn't been around for a couple of months. Lookin' for that Pot 'O Gold with his guitar probably.

Do you see the connection? — apokrisis

You must not be talking to me.

Do you mean in the models of dynamical systems? Which models exactly? — apokrisis

Simplest example in the complex plane. $f(z)={{z}^{2}}\Rightarrow {{f}^{-1}}(z)=\sqrt{z}$ Single-valued to multi-valued. One could toss in a t for time.

Thanks for your reply.

Depends on your definition of "eventually". It's not required that monkeys on typewriters eventually compose Shakespeare.

But the point is that it you can construct a machinery of asymptotic approach to a fixed point, then the inverse of that mathematical operation has to be able to pop back out of that point to — apokrisis

Just a minor point, but in dynamical systems this is not necessarily so.

It's too bad Graveltty has been banned. He has a grad degree in physics and some interesting ideas. Do you, by chance, have such a degree? You seem very knowledgeable.

I'm 75; I don't have a lot of water and climate worries, provided I don't live too much longer. I wonder what plans informed adolescents and young adults are making in light of the ongoing crises which they will have to live with. — Bitter Crank

I'm ten years older, so much of what happens will be beyond my awareness. Here in Colorado there is a looming water issue that extends to the Pacific. Over sixty million people rely on the Colorado River.

Shankar Vedantam, the host of the public radio program, Hidden Brain, put it this way: We face an existential threat from survive climate change. Compared to WWII, are we at D Day, or are we at Dunkirk? — Bitter Crank

I heard part of that. An excellent discussion. I was a meteorologist long ago and my opinion is that it's far more important now to prepare for the inevitable. Sure, we can push intelligently toward green energy, but Miami could take a clue from the Maldives where efforts focus on building up the ground levels on the islands. As Shanker stated, we have lost the battle with climate change and must adapt. Little Greta notwithstanding.

You responded to baker’s traditionalism-rich musing about prancing about and showing off as humorous. — kudos

Indeed it is. Somewhere on the downhill spectrum between love of wisdom and love of money. I fear I just enjoyed math and the lifestyle provided by academia. :cool:

Photons have the strange quality not to move in time — GraveItty

It's space that prevents everything from happening at once, and time from everything being everywhere at once — GraveItty

Very nicely put, and thought-provoking.

↪jgill
It is more interesting about how this discussion inevitable turns into a conflict for power between one who sees this long standing institution of the university from a higher moral ground and another with an equally extreme materialist mindset. — kudos

Is that what's happened here? Am I arguing from a "higher moral ground"? Thanks for telling me.

I only taught math (and was a college administrator for a short time). Here in the USA, not the USSR.

What are your thoughts on what this game reveals? — Benj96

With me, it would reveal the difficulty pulling words from my memory at my age. :worry:

Personally, I don't normally take such anomalies too seriously, since I'm not a professional mathematician — Gnomon

Most of us don't either.

I was a gymnast eons ago and agree with you somewhat. It used to be 0-10, and now its 0-?. The judges are usually skilled enough and the routines do have objective aspects. Moves or stunts have a specific numerical rating and how many of them occur is objective. The smoothness of performance, however, is subjective and accounts for some of the points. However, none of this is available for the normal spectator. Football is different, except for interference calls!

I watched some of the climbing comps, and judging was quite objective. Speed climbing, for instance. Bouldering also, with numerical points for the height the climber reaches.

For many if not most of us its not a photographic process. I was a rock climber for many years and frequently had the following experience: I would work on a climbing problem for awhile, the come back a couple of days later to work on it again, and the section of rock would be familiar with the holds about where I remember them. But if I stayed away from the challenge for some time, thinking about it from time to time, when I returned the section of rock was "familiar", but the hand and footholds were sometimes where I didn't remember them.

I've had the same experience with faces. Again, the familiarity but the features not quite how I remember them (assuming physical changes haven't occurred in the time span).

The question then is, is math invented or discovered? — TheMadFool

Math is derived from structures in the physical world. — GraveItty

Originally perhaps. Not so much these days. Abstractions and generalizations abound. After many years I have concluded that math is both created and discovered. When I define a new (but tiny) math object, that is more creative than discovered. Afterwards one can discover what follows from such a definition. But generally speaking most mathematicians pay little attention to the question.

There corresponds no exact mathematical form in the realm of math. — GraveItty

I recently defined an "LFT form" and "attractor form" for linear fractional transformations. These are "exact" mathematical forms. However, "form" can take on other meanings in math. I'm not talking about Platonic forms.

So what's my point? My point is that forms in the mathematical realm owe their existence to the physical reality. — GraveItty

Some do.

The scope of mathematics today is astounding, with an unknown number of areas of investigation. Each day about 250 new papers arrive in ArXiv.org, to be roughly categorized in about 35 general areas. Awhile ago I challenged Alexandre to find out how many math articles exist on Wikipedia.

It's a constraining and confining net thrown on physical reality, thereby darkening many facts — GraveItty

Possibly. Mathematicians working in pure math ask, Why throw a net?

What is this suppose to calculate? — Caldwell

It's a Lagrangian description of quantum activity I suppose. Ask a physicist (if they haven't all left TPF)

Quantum mechanics are mathematical formulations that allow us to produce accurate Mechanical descriptions for the "behavior" of quantum elements — Nickolasgaspar

Some Heavy Math, Dude!

If someone gets to prance around demanding to be reffered to as Dr. So And So, then they better deliver accordingly. — baker

I've actually never known a fellow math PhD who pranced or insisted on the Dr. title. My students called me by my first name or Mr. Gill or professor. It would be fun, however, to witness the prancing. Let me know about it if you see it.

Your previous comment about the ease of acquiring a degree has some merit. There are some "disciplines" where it's a lot easier than math. Sociology, perhaps.

Similarly, becoming an academic or a person with an advanced degree is too easy these days. — baker

A doctor philosophiae is supposed to be someone who can teach others the love of wisdom — baker

An admirable skill for a modern PhD, but has little to do with the degree. As a mathematician I taught the subject in a way I hoped would spark an ongoing interest, but the love of wisdom? I might have been purely a researcher seeking knowledge with the degree.

And in math a PhD is not a trivial undertaking.

... regain our innocence — theRiddler

It appears you've never lost yours. Congratulations.

Similarly, becoming an academic or a person with an advanced degree is too easy these days. — baker

Really? Just your opinion?

What concerns me deeply is our attitude towards our knowledge base, and how we're limiting exploration and imagination — theRiddler

Let's see, about 140 articles on mathematics research sent to ArXiv.org daily. The lack of imagination is astounding.

Light speed being invariant under motion. Quantum effects. Etc.

You've gone down the path of algorithmic theory again, which has little to do with a typical mathematical proof. Not my bailiwick.

It sort of strikes me as odd that the only physical units to determine complexity in mathematical computations would be quantum computers with qubits... What do you think? — Shawn

New to me. Provide a link or two.

A mathematician might say, "That proof was quite complex". Another might add, "Yes, but elementary!"
Both could be correct.

Complexity of proof is a kind of meta-mathematics idea that most mathematicians wouldn't be interested in pursuing. More likely a computer scientist of some sort.

Beyond that, there is complexity of mathematical specialties. Euclidean geometry would be considered fairly light on complexity as compared with Scheme Mathematics