• The why and origins of Religion
    you would rather take the side of the fanatical atheist3017amen

    Sure, what’s the worst they’ve done? I’m really asking because nothing terrible comes to mind.

    you said consciousness doesn't require logic, what does that mean?3017amen

    Meaning there can be consciousness without logic. Critters, for example, are conscious and without logic. One might even argue that you’re conscious and without logic.
  • The why and origins of Religion
    I’m not an atheist. Please exercise better common sense observations.
    — praxis

    I’ll take the reason/science based fanatic
    — praxis

    Because you said the forgoing, in that you would ' take reason/science based fanatic'; was it unreasonable to conclude you were an atheist?
    3017amen

    I’m not going to even dignify that with an answer, and in any case it doesn’t matter.

    he did not know consciousness itself transcends logic. — 3017amen
    You contend that only a religion could inform him of that?
    — praxis

    The short answer to that short question is, I would contend that both science and religion are not mutually exclusive.
    3017amen

    It feels like you’re being evasive. There’s no need for that, I’m totally harmless. Anyway, you mentioned consciousness transcending logic. Perhaps you could rephrase that because your meaning is unclear. Obviously consciousness doesn’t require logic, but I don’t think that’s what you’re trying to say.

    Planetary bodies emitting sound that we can hear isn’t a good example of a shared truth between science and religion.
  • What is the Problem with Individualism?
    Define, "power", as it seems like we are now talking past each other.Harry Hindu

  • The why and origins of Religion


    I’m not an atheist. Please exercise better common sense observations.

    ... he did not know consciousness itself transcends logic.3017amen

    You contend that only a religion could inform him of that? And please exercise better grammar. I couldn’t interpret your double negative.
  • The why and origins of Religion
    “The fanatical atheists are like slaves who are still feeling the weight of their chains which they have thrown off after hard struggle. They are creatures who—in their grudge against traditional religion as the "opium of the masses"—cannot hear the music of the spheres.” ― Albert Einstein3017amen

    Despite his genius I guess Albert didn’t know that sound can’t travel in a vacuum. And if it’s a choice between fanatics, I’ll take the reason/science based fanatic over the ‘I believe whatever sky father (ordinary guy wearing robes and funny hat) tells me’ fanatic, because history shows that the latter is capable of any atrocity.
  • Is Stoicism a better guide to living than Christianity
    ... the values that permeate western culture are largely based on Christianity even for those who don't believe in God.Ross Campbell

    If true that would be a sufficient condemnation for me.

    is Stoicism a better guide to living than Christianity and should it replace the latter as a set of values to live by?Ross Campbell

    Religion is for those who, for whatever reason, are not inclined towards self-actualization and religion could be rather superfluous for the self-actualized. The fundamental incompatibility is that stoicism relies on reason whereas religion relies on faith. The former leads to independence and the development of virtue and the latter to dependence and “the values that permeate western culture”.
  • Science and Religion. Pros and cons?
    Pros of science: iPhone

    Cons of science: A-bomb

    Pros of religion: Grace

    Cons of religion: Jihad
  • The Red Zones Of Philosophy (Philosophical Dangers)


    I did, but looking again I notice the other topic title.
  • The Red Zones Of Philosophy (Philosophical Dangers)


    I'm curious why you use the term 'optimism' rather than denial, short-sightedness, or the like.
  • What is the Problem with Individualism?


    I’d say that the line between pre-birth and after-birth is arbitrary, and we touched on this earlier with Tzeentch‘s claim that ‘all people are born free’. Babies are utterly dependent and have yet to develop a self-identity. A newborn is more an extension of the mother than an independent being, in other words. At least that’s how I see it. Religious folk will see it differently of course.
  • The Unfortunate Prevalence of Nothing-But-ism
    Is it the case that all isms are essentially nothing-but-isms?Janus

    Isms are nothing but nothing-but-isms.
  • What is the Problem with Individualism?
    I can relate to this experience throughout my two pregnancies: the notion of a part of your bodily system ‘expressing its individuality’ by responding in its own way to certain foods, bodily movements/positions or environmental factors (sounds, temperature, etc)...Possibility

    Men too can certainly relate to a body part reacting to stimulus in a way that may not be inline with conscious will. The reaction nevertheless has a purpose and isn’t random or arbitrary.
  • Has this site gotten worse? (Poll)
    I’m not really seeing what others are referring to as a bias. So far, I don’t think I’ve seen one thread where everybody agreed with the OP. It doesn’t matter what your opinion is, someone on here will disagree with you about it. It isn’t an echo chamber by any means, imo.Pinprick

    Anti-group-think group-think, maybe that’s a thing?
  • What is the Problem with Individualism?


    A system is a set of things working together as parts of a mechanism or an interconnecting network. Even you should be able grasp this rather simple concept. Your body, for instance, could be seen as a set of organs working together as parts of a, uh, largely functional individual. None of your organs functions are arbitrary, they each fit into the system in a particular way. There is an order, a system! If your bladder decided that it was an individual and had to express its individuality by peeing whenever you read the word "communist", well, you'd be sitting in a pool of urine right now and wishing your bladder were more responsible.
  • What is the Problem with Individualism?
    Shortly after birth one is excised from his mother, thereby severing any connection to anyone else. There's nothing arbitrary about this very real uncoupling. Indivisibility beyond this point means death.NOS4A2

    Or life, in the form of offspring.

    What is arbitrary is any notion of responsibility toward others, towards some collective, even towards one's newborn.NOS4A2

    It could only be arbitrary if there were no system (social, ecological, or whatever), but there is a system, so it's actually the case that the freer an individuals is the more responsibility they have and the less responsibility they assume the more arbitrary (loss of order) the system becomes.
  • What is the Problem with Individualism?
    CEO's are individuals that have acquired their power not through their work alone.Harry Hindu

    What does that have to do with it, no one acquires their power through their work alone.
  • Has this site gotten worse? (Poll)
    It is not the forum that is special. I am. The forum is just a medium that enabled me to use it advantageously, but to imagine some special place it holds is entirely subjective, a fantasy-narrative that imagines meaning more than this subjectivity.TimeLine
  • Feature requests


    You speak as though I were 100% serious. :lol:
  • Has this site gotten worse? (Poll)
    Missing the sticky community that banished S, Timeline and others. :chin:

    Anyways, I propose a solution. Temporarily put the shout-box back on the front side. Maybe some of the glue and vigor will return, and if it does they can then hide the shout-box again.
  • Feature requests
    And unfortunately there are quite a few inane or outright insane posters on this site, so it's difficult to avoid.Maw

    We only take you about 40% seriously so it all works out nice and tidy.
  • Has this site gotten worse? (Poll)
    I could stand Cormak McCarthy's book The Road, just barely, but not the movie.Bitter Crank

    I know, was surprised they made a movie of it. I don't mind a good monster story as long as it's not too monstery. Didn't recently make it far into To Sleep in a Sea of Stars, for instance. Morris looks good.
  • What is the Problem with Individualism?
    This is almost right. We seem to have forgotten that a company or corporation is not an individual and therefore doesn't possess rights as an individual.Harry Hindu

    Actually it is, from a legal standpoint, although the rights are not identical to an actual person. In any case, the president’s or CEO’s can be individualists, can’t they?
  • Does the inner-ear contribute to what we define as balance in our life?
    My wife has had an inner ear infection and suffered vertigo for the last five weeks and only within the last few hours has it completely abated. Her mind has been as balanced as ever for the duration.
  • Has this site gotten worse? (Poll)
    Hail Mary Project by Andy WeirBitter Crank

    Haven't been able to find a good sci-fi book lately. Thanks for mentioning.
  • What is the Problem with Individualism?


    And if I’m following correctly, the disapproved of antitrust violator will be kicked out of the Individualists club, even though they’ve done nothing to restrict the rights of other individuals.
  • What is the Problem with Individualism?
    So individualist are in favor of antitrust laws? I thought y’all was all about FREEDOM!!
    — praxis

    Individualism really isn't a model for economics. In general individualism promotes freedom, but I think what you are not understanding is that while that is the case, it may not necessarily agree with what individuals use that freedom for. Much in the same spirit of the famous quote "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
    Tzeentch

    This seems to mean that while an individualist may disapprove of antitrust violations they will defend to the death the right to commit antitrust violations.
  • What is the Problem with Individualism?
    That's a lie, I never claimed that individualism seeks to secure power over others. I said there may be the implication that an individualist wants to secure their power by eliminating the competition, ...
    — praxis

    That would make them a non-individualist, then.
    Tzeentch

    So individualist are in favor of antitrust laws? I thought y’all was all about FREEDOM!!
  • What is the Problem with Individualism?
    You claimed that individualism seeks to secure power over others. This is not the case, as individualism recognizes such things as every individual's right to self-determination.

    What you're doing is trying to blame individualism for negative human traits like greed and will to power, which is exactly the type of mischaracterization that Harry Hindu pointed out earlier. You're framing individualism as a form of egotism, which it is not.
    Tzeentch

    That's a lie, I never claimed that individualism seeks to secure power over others. I said there may be the implication that an individualist wants to secure their power by eliminating the competition, in response to Harry's silly strawman about collectivists wanting no dissonance in society.

    I hope you two kids are having fun playing with your little strawmen. :roll:

    Harry wrote: "Nothing [wrong with individualism], as long your individualism doesn't trample on another's right to be an individual."

    How is beating another individual in a competition trampling on their right to be an individual?
  • What is the Problem with Individualism?
    As ↪Harry Hindu pointed out, individualism includes recognizing the rights of other individuals and not just one's own. If one is consistent in their beliefs, an individualist actually would shy away from positions of power over others.Tzeentch

    I don't see how that follows. On an equal playing field (equal rights and opportunity) one individual can compete better, or just be luckier, than others and 'win'. Having won, the playing field would be less equal and the winner would enjoy an advantage. The rules would be the same but the winning individual would have superior resources at their disposal. They would have more power.
  • Sacrifice. (bring your own dagger)
    do you not have a rational basis (as opposed to an empirical one) for believing in the existence of justice or must faith also play a role? — Hanover

    We can be faithful or unfaithful to justice.

    If I grasp the story right, the ultimate destination of highway 61 transcends any notion or feeling of sacrifice and faith is realized. More realistically on highway 61, some comfort is better than none, and we can soldier-on without being undone.
  • What is the Problem with Individualism?
    It seems to me that you are implying that there should be only one group and no competitionHarry Hindu

    Actually if there's any implication along this line it's that the Individualist wants to desimate the competition in order to secure their position of power.
  • Rights Without Responsibilities
    Do you want to go to a cardiac surgeon that is just trying a new procedure for the first time or would you rather that s/he had performed the procedure many, many times?synthesis

    Surgery is a special case because in addition to requiring medical knowledge, skill, and training, it requires opportunity to practice. For medicine in general an inexperienced graduate may be the better choice because they may be more likely to be up to date on the latest research, procedures, etc., whereas the experience old-timer might be more set in their ways.
  • Has this site gotten worse? (Poll)
    I think a lot of the moderators have stopped commenting as much. Comments about moderation have dropped off.T Clark

    Where some see coincidence others see consequence. Seriously though, they probably helped to simulate interesting and good quality topics.
  • Sacrifice. (bring your own dagger)


    I felt that I could afford a little indulgence.
  • What is the Problem with Individualism?
    Why by lottery and not by free elections?Harry Hindu

    They are free, and in fact every eligible citizen receives a free sticker just for participating. Why lottery? In attempt to remove the incentive for power seeking. There’s no point of investing in power seeking if power is randomly given.

    You're the one that used a single word to describe individualists, as if the two terms were essentially conflated, when you only need to take a second to see how that is just as much a property of collectives as it is individuals.Harry Hindu

    I tried to describe the difference as succinctly as possible. You apparently disagree, offering the rationale that everyone both competes and cooperates.

    Maybe it has to do with competition vs cooperation as it relates specifically to power distribution in society. The individualist wants to win the game and the collectivist wants to play the game indefinitely and where ‘everyone’s a winner!’, essentially. In real life this plays out as collectivists supporting collective power, such as workers unions, and individualists supporting capital free enterprise and its concentrations of power.
  • What is the Problem with Individualism?
    That's strange that you don't see the autocrat as someone that competed to get to the top of society.Harry Hindu

    In my hypothetical society autocrats are appointed by lottery. Kinda rando but eminently egalitarian.

    Individuals are free to work with others if they so chooseHarry Hindu

    If they live in society they really have no choice but to be mostly cooperative.

    I don't why you would think that competition is soley the characteristic of individualists.Harry Hindu

    Not sure how saying that someone may want to behave in a particular way means that they can only behave in that way.

    Collectivists seem intent on limiting individual thought and imposing the thought of one individual on the rest.Harry Hindu

    Cooperation does require compatible values and goals, no getting around that. I imagine the same holds true for individualists who cooperate with each other.
  • Do Atheists hope there is no God?
    And if by "dialectics" you mean MarxismApollodorus

  • What is the Problem with Individualism?
    Because no one cares for your pity or melodramatic prose.