Is the version you've read older or younger? — Dawnstorm

It is younger. It was written between 1979 and 1981.

There's a lot I can't say, because there's a lot I don't know. See? For example, I don't know how he framed the list you gave us. — Dawnstorm

Neither do I.

I do not have a big problem with his list nor the way he framed it. He was free to write about important books, and, according to the introduction, it seemed that those books were classics to him because they helped him to become a writer and a man of arts.

Nonetheless, I disagree (at least with the version I have) with how he overreacted. Because, as I said, he named his work "Why Reading the Classics". This means to me that he was inviting us into his canon of literature or aesthetics. I am grateful for that; but I think that I would have disagreed with him if I had had the opportunity to discuss his work with him.

Bias is inevitable, and I don't think eliminating bias is even something one should attempt. Especially not in an article that wavers between social and personal, like this one. — Dawnstorm

I agree.

Then, since bias is inevitable, I think he should have named his essay in a different manner. I repeat that the list is actually good, and I understand why he chose those books over others. Yet, I think that Calvino must have said that the list was a personal project rather than being objective.

And I hope you don't think I'm denigrating Don Quixote — Dawnstorm

German translation — Dawnstorm

No, no. I haven't thought of that while debating with you. Au contraire I believe you respect Don Quixote.
--------------
So, you are German or from Austria. Look at Calvino's list again then. He didn't mention any relevant work of your language, such as "The Nibelungenlied" or Rilke's poetry. When there is too many to name.

Rose, o pure contradiction, desire
to be no one's sleep beneath so many
lids.

- Rilke. :flower: :sparkle:

I think we are interpreting Calvino's essay differently. It is not a problem since literature is open to interpretation and criticism. For this reason, I still argue that it is surprising how Calvino skipped or missed very important authors, and he was biased with Italian writers. It would not be a problem if he would have called his work "my favourite books of all time" or "my top list of books I always enjoyed" etc.

But his essay is called "Why Reading the Classics". It means – at least to me – that he is inviting us to read them because those works are the epitome of literature, and we would miss important knowledge on literature if we did otherwise. I am not against his personal list. I just disagree with how he overreacted to those books and authors.

On the other hand, I disagree that Don Quixote is not necessary to be mentioned in his essay because it is already known by the vast majority. According to that point, he wouldn't have mentioned Odyssey as well, when this is another important and recognised work of literature.

It's like he's encouraging you to go beyond the well-known and figure out your own canon. — Dawnstorm

It might be.

Yes, but isn’t that the point? If he were an American, there would be Fitzgerald, Faulkner, Bellow, Melville, Whitman; all exceptional. In fact, one could probably make a list like this composed entirely of Americans. — Tom Storm

Tom, I guess I found the solution: why not write a list of classics of each country? :smile:

Might "a classic" just be called "a great book"? — BC

That is what I think, yes. At least it is more accurate than call them "Classics"

#5. "A classic is a book which even when we read it for the first time gives the sense of rereading something we have read before."

I like that. — BC

I also like that definition. In my edition it is located in the 2nd place, not the 5th; it was very important to him to reread some works. I wonder if he read them for pleasure or to help him become a better writer. We can't really know; Calvino was a bit ambiguous in this essay.

I've never liked Hemingway. — BC

Neither do I.

I read Don Quixote, once upon a time. — BC

Surprisingly, Calvino did not include Don Quixote in his list. He just mentioned "Tirant lo Blanch", an epic poem very similar to Cid. I mean, of course these are important and excellent books of my country, but putting them above Don Quixote... Wow! That was kind of excessive.

What about individual poems -- can they be classics along side novels? — BC

I think so, too.

There are poems which deserve to be regarded as classics, and I think that some are better than the books on Calvino's list. But I do not want to criticize him for this, because it is true that he focused on prose, not on poetry.

Honestly, if I were called to do a list of classic poets and poems, I would put haiku poets for sure, even though I understand that haiku are very ambiguous and they are hard to understand for Western readers. Then I am aware that doing a list of classics is a very serious task, not exempt from controversy.

"'I'm rereading...', never 'I'm reading...'" — Dawnstorm

This is true. Sorry for my mistake.

Edit: I just corrected it.

I find it more bizarre to see an Italian who doesn't include Virgil and the Commedia. It's like leaving out Shakespeare and Milton in English. — Count Timothy von Icarus

I thought the same. I believe he didn't add that since it would be too evident given that he is Italian. However, he made sure to mention his fellow (Italian) writers.

The idea of a “universally agreed upon” classic novel is probably seen as a bit outdated these days. — Tom Storm

I agree. :up:

Literary value is filtered through culture, history, and personal taste. — Tom Storm

True. But I believe that Calvino was more influenced by his personal taste than culture and history. This is why I dislike his bias towards Italian authors. Honestly, I didn't know most of them. Furthermore, I think that he missed important authors from Asia and Oceania. He started with good points on Greek literature because it is obvious that they shaped our thoughts and our opinion on culture. Yet, this even depends on what kind of culture we are talking about. I bet Asian students consider "Classics" the haiku and Samurai stories rather than Balzac.

I dislike most of Dostoyevsky I have read, except for his mercifully concise The Gambler - — Tom Storm

I also enjoyed The Gambler a lot! Why didn't you enjoy the rest of Dostoevsky's works? You are free to dislike it, but since I am a very big fan of him, I am here if you want to discuss something about him or his novels.

Not really. French novels have often been considered masterpieces of world literature, and writers like Voltaire, Balzac, Stendhal, Hugo, Flaubert, Zola, Maupassant, Proust, and Gide usually appear on those venerable lists of the 'greatest writers' of all time. I have read most of these and would consider them very fine, although Proust does bore me somewhat. — Tom Storm

I can't disagree with that. I understand that French writers had an important influence on most modern authors. Nonetheless, I still think that they are no longer that important. It appeared in other styles and authors, which can illustrate the modern readers. If you look closely at his list, it is obvious that it is very European, not to mention that he avoided important authors in Spanish. One French author is OK, but he seemed obsessed with them.

Classics are very much a collective canon; "individual classics" is an oxymoron. — SophistiCat

Exactly.

Perhaps, Calvino did a mix between the collective and the oxymoron. I fully agree with him when he stated the Odyssey as the first-ever classic work. I am aware that there are also other works written in Sumerian, but Homer's works shaped the culture and literature of the world in the next generations.

On the other hand, it is remarkable that he also mentioned a large number of French authors. Although France was the epitome of the 19th century, it is no longer a known country for its literature. I can understand that Balzac is very important, but considering him a classic when his works didn't survive in the 21st century is a bit excessive. I thought that Clavino was very influenced by what was the literature stream of his time. It is strange that he didn't have a look at Asian literature, for instance.

But it is just that, a personal list.

You mentioned Calvino's bias towards Italian authors. Each culture will have its own version of the literary canon — SophistiCat

Absolutely.

But it is a bit unfair that he claimed those works as "classics", and keep in mind that he even called the essay "Why Reading the Classics", meaning that he is inviting us to read them, and it seems that we are missing "something" if we do otherwise.

If a Greek tells me: "Homer is a Classic." I have to agree with him. But I don't know if we could consider Odysséas Elýtis as a classic, although he was an excellent poet and a Nobel laureate.

If a Russian fella tells me: "Dostoevsky's works are Classics". I have to agree with him as well. But, what works of Dostoevsky? Because some of them are unknown to the vast majority of the public.

For that reason, I believe that in terms of writing an essay about the "Classics", we have to leave aside our bias towards our country and culture and try to have a more universal opinion. Again, I think my list of classics would have more works of Japanese and Chinese authors, for instance.

Minding is a metacognitive activity (i.e. strange looping process), and not an entity; it is what an ecology-situated, sufficiently complex brain can do, rather than some ontologically separate (e.g. non-physical) or "emergent" woo-stuff. Also: not to be confused with consciousness. — 180 Proof

:up:

What do you think the boundaries of both are? Is there a difference between minding and consciousness?

My father's ancestors were farmers. One of the features of farming in the late 19th into the 20th century is how often farmers moved -- not for better views, but because farms failed financially fairly often. Good land but bad economies. — BC

My ancestors were farmers too. They worked the land in Toledo and a region located in the south of Madrid, which no longer exists because it is urbanised. I understand what you are referring to -- farmers are often condemned to be here and there, like nomads. It is true that my family had never experienced a similar psychological impact to the Great Depression, but my grandparents recall the financial struggle after the Spanish Civil War or in the 1970s when Spain suffered an inexplicable inflation of prices.

Due to the reasons and circumstances expressed above, the next generations were always taught to avoid farming as labour or financial status. It is poorly treated and low paid. I don't know what your ancestors grew. Mine grew cereals and grapes. Very important products to feed the population, but they are paid very cheaply (as always), and the profits go to the supermarkets and intermediaries.

My point is that farmers have always suffered from failed financial status all over the world.

October 20th, 2015: I remember it well. — Jamal

Just over a month to go pals... :cool:

I think we might celebrate doing something. and all.

War and Peace by Leo Tolstoy.

Exactly. My granny is 91 years old, and it seemed that the covid didn't even approximate to her. It is crazy how this virus works. Hopefully, we live in a very modern era, and scientists can overcome this virus quickly.

I got infected with coronavirus. It is not the first time, though. Nonetheless, I feel this time it hit me stronger. There was a small wave of infections in Madrid for the last few weeks. I was exhausted as never before, and my muscles ached and cramped.

I thought: Fortunately, I am vaccinated. Otherwise, with this "new version" of Covid, I would be in serious trouble.

I will never understand anti-vaxxers. Do they wish to die from the coronavirus?

When the test marked that I was infected with coronavirus, I remembered all the people who sadly got infected before the vaccines were launched. What a complete tragedy the people suffered in 2020.

This film shocked me in an indescribable way. What scared me the most is that it is based on a real-life story: the murders of Danish serial killer Dagmar Overbye.

The film is set on a black-and-white screen and in 1919 Denmark. The main protagonist did a very nice job, convincing. There are scenes which are "hard to swallow", and it might not be for all kinds of audiences.

Anyway, it is a great film.

The Petty Demon by Fyodor Sologub.

@T Clark -- It's been a while since I recommended you a film. :cool:

I watched two amazing and unique Russian films this month. I am aware that Russian film directors are great and original, but I chose these two because of the difference in time span between them and the iconography used.

Come and See (Idí i Smotrí): a 1985 Soviet epic tragedy film directed by Elem Klimov. Klimov had to fight eight years of censorship from the Soviet authorities before he was allowed to produce the film in its entirety... The starring were two talented kids called Aleksei Kravchenko and Olga Mironova. The flim mixes surrealism with a bit of existentialism that we used to watch and read in Russian arts.



The other film is more recent but also interesting and worthy to watch. It is called Petrov's Flu.
Just before the start of the new year, Petrov's family gets sick with the flu. Then he meets a trickster named Igor who can mix the world of the living and the dead. The Petrov family begin to suffer surrealistic hallucinations and the line between reality and hallucination begins to disappear.

The Book of Laughter and Forgetting by Milan Kundera.

@daniel j lavender wasn't a new member per se.

He returned after years missing only to be banned. This is what I call a real "plot twist."

But I think this latest one is copied from el fin del mundo- it's the exact same town. — Manuel

Yes, that's true. I confused the titles of the books, sorry.

Absolutely, I enjoyed reading "comendador" and "crónica". I think "After Dark" is also really nice, and I've never read Norwegian Wood, which is one of his most famous works.

To be honest, I think Murakami is very good at writing short stories and essays. I read "Underground" last year, and it was amazing. He did a great job interviewing all the victims of the 1995 Tokyo Underground terrorist attack. However, when it came to novels, I (sometimes) believed that he wrote solely to please his fans and the Western market.

Had to drop the newest Murakami after reading 30% of the book, his quality has dropped quite a bit since 1Q84, this meditative side is very boring to me. — Manuel

I remember getting very sad and disappointed after finishing the book. He admitted in the book (Tusquets Spanish edition) that the new novel was a "cut and copy" from Crónica del pájaro que da vuelta al mundo.

I haven't read anything again from him since last year...

El Bataraz by Mauricio Rosencof.

Recognizing it as an industry gives space for discussions about labor rights, safety, and respect, rather than just moral judgment or legal status. — PatriciaCollins

It would be hard for some to recognise and respect a sexual worker. For this reason, it is more important to give them [the prostitutes] a legal status. This can defend them from people who don't understand that prostitution is actually a job. Furthermore, it would help the girls to be more independent from the "pimps" or club owners. So, in my humble opinion, legal status goes before abstract ethical actions.

She suggests that one should be careful about taking everything Romans said about sex at face value. Romans, like everybody else, might exaggerate on occasion. (Well, everybody except me and thee.) — BC

Interesting!

Yes, I don't usually take the Roman writings as reliable. It is true that they exaggerate, and I don't think that the Roman soldiers in the Legion were the objects of endless orgies. For this reason, I wanted to take the Greek testimonials as more accurate to the time we discussed.

My wannabe artist moment of yesterday afternoon:

I had fun with mixing all the colours!

They probably did, but while the institution of man/adolescent relationships included a sexual element, it was also a civic mentoring relationship. It existed to reproduce the ruling class. Your local plumber in Athens did not take on an apprentice that included sex on the side. This was a ruling class activity, guided by rules, enforced (more or less) by other members of the elite. — BC

Furthermore, I also read that prostitution was low-class because the prostitute didn't have anything to offer but just sex. It is interesting to distinguish between those young boys who were sexual offerers and the young boys who were just "innocent" or learners of the old men. Surprisingly, it was accepted by the Greek culture the latter, because it was fine for the people to have sexual interactions with minora if they weren't "corrupted" in both spirit and body. While a young boy offering sex in exchange for money was not well seen at all. It wasn't until Plato that some basic sense needed to exist regarding the minimum age for that kind of relationship.

For the reasons expressed above, I think that pederasty, in an Ancient Greek context, could be seen from two different perspectives: ethics and aesthetics (eros). I think Plato explored the first option, and he got really mad at those vicious members of Crete.

Plato and Aristotle weren't writing for brick layers and plumbers; the Age of Pericles wasn't for the slaves or the free workers. That's pretty much the usual and customary relationship between culture and class throughout history, including the present moment. — BC

Yes, that's right, but according to those authors, the relationships were never forces; or there isn't proof of that at least. I think this is important, because it was a specific way of interaction, and philosophers were interested in it.

The high level of literacy and communication tools today allows for people like you and me (who will always have to work in order to live) to engage in discussions about 'elite topics'. But we aren't members of "the elite" because we lack the wealth, credentials, opportunities, relationships, and so on that characterize elites. We are not "movers and shakers" as the expression goes. The elites have always been the tip of the social pyramid. — BC

Exactly.

We just don't know much about what life was like in Greece and Rome for the vast majority of the population. The classical era's proletariate wasn't the topic of a lot of writing from the period. Alas. — BC

Do you think the erômenos (younger male) were part of the classical era's proletariate?

"Pederasty, Eros and Ancient Greece" — BC

Thanks! I am pleased with your replies and contributions to this thread! :smile:

To this heatwave:

What in God's name were they thinking? — BC

I thought the same. But I ended with the conclusion that they were not ethically bad. It was a widely accepted practice amongst Ancient Greek society, and most of them considered it good and acceptable. Yet everything changed when Plato wrote about it in "Laws" when he argued that there should be a limit on the age of sexual relationships between men.

Nonetheless, everything really changed when the Greek Orthodox Church started to have more power in Greek culture and education -- they rejected any kind of sexual affair that wasn't just for procreation objectives.

It is important to show the art done by goldsmiths: they just represented what was commonly done in their era.

BC! I am pleased with your reply. I honestly thought about you when I started this thread because I know that you took classes on Ancient Greek. We talked about this in the past in the shoutbox.

OK -- coming back to the thread:

I agree with the point that rich and powerful men had affairs with young boys because they ended up bored in their marriage. Nonetheless, if they got tired of their respective wives, why didn't they pay for the services of a prostitute? This point is also explored in the books I quoted above. Perhaps it was more accepted amongst Greek society to be a master of young boys -- and these innocent kids pay them back with sex because it was the correct way to proceed.

There was a time-limit for the young man and older man: after the young man reached a certain age, he was supposed to take his place as a heterosexual man with a wife, etc. — BC

Exactly. When the young boys started to have beards or their voices turned deep, they ended up rejected by their "tutors" or old lovers. Some students and experts of Ancient Greece agree that the young boys were never forced to have those affairs, and most of them were in the teenage span. They were not kids.

The Greeks engaged in pederasty -- relationships between adult men and mid-to-late adolescents. — BC

And theese relationship were consented -- it wasn't an abuse of power by the adult men.

While a lot of Americans make no distinction among pedophilia, hebephilia, and pederasty... — BC

Hey! I had the same issue, so I had to read on the Internet the distinction between them. :sweat:

The Transylvanian Trilogy: Volume III. You are torn to pieces. by Miklós Bánffy.

Excellent! I really enjoyed reading this trilogy. I learnt many things about the Austro-Hungarian Empire and why the First World War happened. A great compilation of witnesses from that period of time. :up:

Another rabbit hole: constructed emotion theory and aesthetic experience. — praxis

A rabbit hole we can jump into, if you wish. :wink:

It comes when the time is right. I feel it could be sooner than later. I want to wait a little bit longer, to see what may happen before Entry 001. There is still potential in the air that could change it's direction or focus. I want to exhaust it before the start. The first entry is important, I believe and sets the path on its way — Kizzy

Understandable! Take the time you need, Kizzy. It is important to do the things right!

I will ask: Would you consider yourself a patient person, overall javi? How have you occupied your time the past few weeks, here? Any thoughts on the latest threads? — Kizzy

Those are very good questions.

1. I have never been a very patient person, to be honest. It is something that I could work out with time. I believe that the older you are, the more patient you become. I think I can consider myself a patient person right now, but it is true that it is hard for me to wait for something that interests me, like your files and this very interesting thread.

2. My past few weeks here were exciting. I even started a thread. I think I was very active in July all along. I had fun in different threads, but The Shoutbox conversations were my favourite part.

3. No, I don't have any thoughts on the latest threads. They are interesting but very complex to me. It is true that @kirillov's OP on suffering is very appealing because it stimulated me to reread Kierkegaard, and I very much appreciate this.

Do you know what thread you last bookmarked? Or what thread do you have a recent draft saved for? — Kizzy

I only bookmarked 'currently reading' thread. I think I have never bookmarked anything else.

No, I haven't saved any draft for the moment.

Nietzsche says bad readers haven't read him, — DifferentiatingEgg

OK.

Folks keep posting thoughts and comments about Nietzsche or Schopenhauer when the OP clearly stated that their philosophy no longer satisfies him. So, there is no solution for the moment. He just asked us what to read now, not what you guys think about these German boys. :grin:

This is Schopenhauer's point. — frank

Yes, but @kirillov doesn't see Schopenhauer's point as really satisfactory. I think the solution might be to recommend other readings or philosophers, as I did with Kierkegaard. Furthermore, I honestly believe that K is more relevant than Schopenhauer regarding the understanding of angst, dread, or suffering. But I guess that he is often not mentioned because some think he was actually a theologian.

Hello kirillov, welcome to TPF. If those ideas haven't satisfied you, I guess it is time to move on and search for new ideas that can inspire you. I see you have read both Schopenhauer and Nietzsche. Didn't you try Kierkegaard? And before him, there is also Hegel.

I understand that Kierkegaard could be complex. I admit that it took a lot to understand him, and not always satisfactorily! Depending on translations and context, I think it would help you his works on anxiety/dread/angst.

The Concept of Anxiety is one of his most known and notable works, yet I liked Fear and Trembling more.

Fear and Trembling speaks of many of Kierkegaard's most well-known concepts, such as the absurd, knight of faith, single individual, teleological suspension of the ethical, three stages, tragic hero, and so on.

On the other hand, if you enjoy reading novels, Dostoevsky is also a good choice.

Things like this belong in the Lounge, so put it there yourself next time please. — Jamal

:up: :up: