• evtifron
    13
    I believe that Dostoevsky should be viewed not as a philosopher, although there is certainly an incredible amount of philosophical ideas in his works, but as an ideally accurate representation of the archetype of the Russian person and his soul, after reading a huge number of his works in the original, his letters and articles, I see him as brilliant a Russian writer with a Western form of narration, a Russophile and a person who believes in Jesus with all his heart, and his whole philosophy is directed against socialism and nihilism in particular, projecting this in his works of art and articles, this is his main philosophical applied position, his love for Jesus and Russia is inseparable from his philosophy
  • Bertoldo
    31

    Certainly. I agree with almost everything.
    The only thing is that he should, in fact, be considered a philosopher. Of course he surpasses philosophy when gives a kind of definition to his work, reaching purely theological foundations and justifications, although Philosophy must not be discarded, as Philosophy must not ought to be problem-solving, but to demonstrate inconsistencies on rational inquiries and logical abstractions, being this way, after all Dostoevsky manifests the importance of Theology.
12Next
bold
italic
underline
strike
code
quote
ulist
image
url
mention
reveal
youtube
tweet
Add a Comment

Welcome to The Philosophy Forum!

Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.