I believe that Dostoevsky should be viewed not as a philosopher, although there is certainly an incredible amount of philosophical ideas in his works, but as an ideally accurate representation of the archetype of the Russian person and his soul, after reading a huge number of his works in the original, his letters and articles, I see him as brilliant a Russian writer with a Western form of narration, a Russophile and a person who believes in Jesus with all his heart, and his whole philosophy is directed against socialism and nihilism in particular, projecting this in his works of art and articles, this is his main philosophical applied position, his love for Jesus and Russia is inseparable from his philosophy

Certainly. I agree with almost everything.
The only thing is that he should, in fact, be considered a philosopher. Of course he surpasses philosophy when gives a kind of definition to his work, reaching purely theological foundations and justifications, although Philosophy must not be discarded, as Philosophy must not ought to be problem-solving, but to demonstrate inconsistencies on rational inquiries and logical abstractions, being this way, after all Dostoevsky manifests the importance of Theology.

-