This user has been deleted and all their posts removed.

And "fluroush"? — tim wood

I quite like the sound of it, actually. I think it's called "freedom of expression", "using language creatively and artistically", etc. Potentially significant contribution to tired, old atheistic "philosophy" IMO.

Two assumptions to look out for:

• That Einstein had one view on god that remained unchanging throughout his life.
• That Einstein, doubtless an authority on matters physical, should be considered an authority on matters relating to god.

As it is, affiliation is not evidence of belief. I will concede that in many cases it is, but I still disqualify your claim as unsupported. — tim wood

If affiliation is not evidence of belief, then affiliation is not evidence of atheism either. Your claim stands unsupported.

This user has been deleted and all their posts removed.

Does philosophy include metaphysics, you think?

:up:

This user has been deleted and all their posts removed.

And you forgot this bit:

"Furthermore, the global study noted that many of the unaffiliated, which include atheists and agnostics, still have various religious beliefs and practices"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_atheism

Your baseless claim stands (or rather, falls) refuted.

This user has been deleted and all their posts removed.

This user has been deleted and all their posts removed.

This user has been deleted and all their posts removed.

This user has been deleted and all their posts removed.

If you cannot or will not grasp a distinction between belief in God and religious affiliation or belief, then the rest of your argument(s) are suspect. No doubt many do, but that is not the claim you're making. — tim wood

You asked me to "take a survey". When I presented the Pew survey's findings you changed tack and inexplicably denied everything.

"Furthermore, the global study noted that many of the unaffiliated, which include atheists and agnostics, still have various religious beliefs and practices"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_atheism

Your baseless claim stands (or rather, falls) refuted.

That Einstein, doubtless an authority on matters physical should be considered an authority on matters relating to god. — Banno

Religious folk require validation by a higher authority, and who's smarter than frick'n Einstein.

"According to the Pew Research Center's 2012 global study of 230 countries and territories, 16% of the world's population is not affiliated with a religion, while 84% are affiliated. Furthermore, the global study noted that many of the unaffiliated, which include atheists and agnostics, still have various religious beliefs and practices"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_atheism

Pew says that "many of the unaffiliated atheists and agnostics still have various religious beliefs and practices".

The atheists seem determined to deny the facts at all costs. I wonder why this might be. Any suggestions?

This user has been deleted and all their posts removed.

This user has been deleted and all their posts removed.

Youre' not wirth the time and effort. Those thinking you are can expend that time and effort and review the posts. — tim wood

"Wirth"??? Are you sure English is your first language?

This user has been deleted and all their posts removed.

Einstein in a religious context reminds me of the time when some friends and I wanted to play volleyball; we had to divide ourselves into two teams. There was this guy who was an exceptionally good player [read Einstein] and both teams [read atheists & theists]wanted him on their side. Nothing more need be said.

The atheists seem determined to deny the facts at all costs. I wonder why this might be. Any suggestions? — Apollodorus

Great question! I have many thoughts on the subject matter relative to cognitive science. But first let me ask, do you happen to have William James' book, Varieties of Religious Experience?

If so, the chapter after the Sick Soul called The Divided Self, talks about Buddhist philosophy /discipline relative to purging anger and worry. Specifically, a story on page 201... .

Anyway more to come...

TMF!

Thank you for your contribution as always. Examples that would help to elucidate that subject matter? — 3017amen

Come to think of it, I take back what I said. In the beginning, I thought Einstein was guilty of loose terminology - misusing/abusing the word "god". However, this may not necessarily be the case as the apparent confusion with respect to Einstein's stand on god can be pinned down to misinterpretation of the word "god".

On many occasions, Einstejn seems to have made it clear that he was only interested in the Spinozist god (pantheism). It appears that theists who believe in the "other" god, the god who's all-good, all-powerful, all-knowing and who takes keen interest in the affairs of humans, intervening on occasion, have misconstrued this fact. Case closed!

Absolutely, agreed!!! :up:

Einstein in a religious context reminds me of the time when some friends and I wanted to play volleyball; we had to divide ourselves into two teams. There was this guy who was an exceptionally good player [read Einstein] and both teams [read atheists & theists]wanted him on their side. Nothing more need be said. — TheMadFool

I don't think anyone here is on team Spinoza.

A reliable source on the subject is Walter Isaacson's recent bio, Einstein: His Life and Universe, Chapter 17 'Einstein's God'.

A relevant Einstein quote:

A human being is a part of the whole, called by us "Universe", a part limited in time and space. He experiences himself, his thoughts and feelings as something separated from the rest — a kind of optical delusion of his consciousness. The striving to free oneself from this delusion is the one issue of true religion. Not to nourish the delusion but to try to overcome it is the way to reach the attainable measure of peace of mind. — Letter of condolence sent to Robert J. Marcus of the World Jewish Congress, 12 February 1950

I think Einstein's notion of 'a personal God' is mistaken. I understand that images of 'the sky-father' have roots in an earlier age of mankind - actually the name 'Jupiter' is derived from the Indo-European root 'Sky Father', and I often think this is what a lot of people, believers and atheists both, have in mind when they speak of God. (Maybe remaining silent would be an option!) But such images are couched in terms which were meaningful to peasant farmers and herdsmen in pagan agrarian societies. They simply don't translate to modern post-industrial culture. But that is where interpretive skill is needed. The kind of 'personal God' who 'takes interest' in human affairs might not be what is meant by the name of God in the first place, notwithstanding that it is what a lot of believers understand by it.

But beyond religious imagery and symbolism and the rites of traditional religion, says Einstein:

Try and penetrate with our limited means the secrets of nature and you will find that, behind all the discernible concatenations, there remains something subtle, intangible and inexplicable. Veneration for this force beyond anything that we can comprehend is my religion. To that extent I am, in point of fact, religious.

I still reckon that ought to have been enough for Einstein to have not been the subject of the first chapter of Dawkins' book The God Delusion. If anyone joined the erstwhile Dawkins forum and made a statement like that, they'd be howled down in no uncertain terms, which is typical of the vast confusion swirling around this whole business.

the chapter after the Sick Soul called The Divided Self, talks about Buddhist philosophy /discipline relative to purging anger and worry. — 3017amen

I must concur.

"First, Admit You Are Angry

This may sound silly, but how many times have you met someone who clearly was angry, but who insisted he was not? For some reason, some people resist admitting to themselves that they are angry. This is not skillful. You can’t very well deal with something that you won’t admit is there.

Buddhism teaches mindfulness. Being mindful of ourselves is part of that. When an unpleasant emotion or thought arises, do not suppress it, run away from it, or deny it. Instead, observe it and fully acknowledge it. Being deeply honest with yourself about yourself is essential to Buddhism.

What Makes You Angry?

It’s important to understand that anger is very often (the Buddha might say always) created entirely by yourself. It didn’t come swooping out of the ether to infect you. "

https://www.learnreligions.com/anger-and-buddhism-449713

Maybe atheists would benefit from taking up Buddhism or some other religion, seeing that according to Pew many of them do covertly harbor religious and other beliefs. They certainly should seriously consider it. Nothing to lose in any case, aside maybe their unfounded pride.

Veneration for this force — Wayfarer

I knew it, he was a Jedi.

Team Spinoza here.

I stand corrected.