Surely the "problem" here would be the desire to understand why we bother thinking, wouldn't it? :wink: — Janus
You don't think that having a desire for something can become a problem until it is satisfied?Sounds to me more like a desire. — Ciceronianus the White
Maybe.
Stephen King has a catchphrase, born in the Dark Tower series.....”they have forgotten the face of their fathers”, a literary commentary on honor.
Pragmatists, and analytical philosophers in general, have forgotten their fathers, a philosophical commentary on teachings.
Progress, I suppose. — Mww
not universally true........ — Janus
It seems to me you are being pedantic, playing with words. What you suggest would be true of any question other than critical questions dealing with how to merely survive. — Janus
Point taken. I may have missed your intention in the OP. Yet, in my experience, the term "presupposition" is typically used as a negative assessment of someone else's unwarranted beliefs. However, in the usage by Christian Apologists, it is intended to imply a positive meaning : faith in the Judeo-Christian God.Absolutely not. Presuppositions that ground what you say and do, and absolute presuppositions that stand in relation to those things as being like axioms. Nothing whatsoever unwarranted or biased about them. — tim wood
Ah, "mere survival."
Words are significant (unlike survival?). But when we desire something, we're not engaged in problem-solving. You yourself seem to acknowledge this when you referred to a desire becoming a problem. If it hasn't become one, it can't be one, right?
An example of what you believe is a desire which is a problem would be useful. — Ciceronianus the White
Philosophically, Pierce blew himself up advocating objective idealism. Yea? Nay? — Mww
but "aegis of tutelage" doesn’t Google. Cool soundbite, though. Like something just itching to be said. — Mww
Anyway....don’t take my flippancy seriously; it’s only the little George Carlin in me. — Mww
I don't mean to harp on one note, but I didn't interpret the topic of this thread as referring to pragmatic mathematical axioms -- that are "rationally adequate for a reflective task". Instead, I thought it was referring to presumptuous beliefs and attitudes. Which implies an unshakable faith in what is True and Real.Absolutely not. Presuppositions that ground what you say and do, and absolute presuppositions that stand in relation to those things as being like axioms. Nothing whatsoever unwarranted or biased about them. — tim wood
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.