That is your conclusion frank. But again it’s subject to interpretation if there is only divine mind and we’re all manifestations of it then solipsism has a case.
Should I elaborate ? — Deus
Isn't that still solipsism? As I point out, whether god or my ego, only that "self" is real to itself. — 180 Proof
whether god or my ego, only that "self" is real to itself. — 180 Proof
Objectivity need not - does not - require that we all see the same thing. It does require that our explanations be consistent. — Banno
Objectivity need not - does not - require that we all see the same thing. It does require that our explanations be consistent. — Banno
The challenge QM gives us, at least with the Copenhagen interpretation, is nature of a system that's in superposition. — frank
The problem is that it has no particular state. — frank
explanation is only an aid to understanding reality for Perception achieves the same thing without it. — Deus
Certainly, any jump to "nothing is real" is unjustified. — Banno
I'm not going to play at physics. I'll leave that to physicist. — Banno
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.