You have admitted that When you don't think, you don't exist is incorrect.
That proves, When you think, you exist is also logically incorrect. — Corvus
The classic symbolic logic works on the forms only. No contents — Corvus
I don't think you showed any arguments for it doesn't prove that, did you?No it doesn't prove that. Your next move is to say "Why not". Because burden of proof is not on me. — Lionino
Classic symbolic logic works by showing how the arguments transit from one to the other mainly using the variables. Sometimes you would introduce negations, AND, OR connectives in the process of proving. But in the process, if you noticed the critical point where it disproves the core points, then it will deduce the conclusion from the statement which is obviously true or false. This is the way the logical proving works. You seem to be totally ignorant of how the proving procedure works. It is like those folks who are into the habitual copying and pasting truth tables and some symbols in the internet, and insist that is the only way MP works what have you.Obviously, because you can't recall what you said 1 page ago, you will say those two are different. But: — Lionino
If you say, you think therefore you are, is the only way for you exist, then when you are not thinking, you stop existing. That is what you mean logically. Don't you find that absurd? — Corvus
Please save this argument for after you post the pictures from your textbook. Your argument will hold more weight then - or it will disintegrate, depending on what's in the book. — flannel jesus
If I don't, then you know the answer. — Corvus
Is this you confirming that you won't post the pictures if they don't confirm your beliefs? I truly hope that you can be better than that — flannel jesus
Is this you confirming that you won't post the pictures if they don't confirm your beliefs? I truly hope that you can be better than that — flannel jesus
Post the pictures — Lionino
Please tell me what is the point you don't see in my post above — Corvus
P = I think, therefore I exist.
Q = I don't think, therefore I don't exist.
P - > Q
This is implied from P logically oK?? — Corvus
what in the world are you talking about? — flannel jesus
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.