Addendum:

...my goal is to make a metaphysical statement true. — ucarr

Metaphysics - model-based rules that give meaning to experimental data and empirical experience.

All three statements here are essentially non sequiturs to one another.

The fourth, addended, seems to make less sense than the others.

Metaphysics - model-based rules that give meaning to experimental data and empirical experience. — ucarr

The fourth, addended, seems to make less sense than the others. — AmadeusD

I have your evaluation. Let me see your analysis; I want to examine and evaluate its form and accuracy.

You've been evaluated. If they are non sequiturs or spurious, there's nothing to 'analyze'. I suggest that is the case. It is an incoherent request for something which - apparently, you don't actually want. That is because I have quite clearly given you my position, and you just walk away.

You've been evaluated. If they are non sequiturs or spurious, there's nothing to 'analyze'. — AmadeusD

You err in making this claim. A non sequitur follows a specific form which you must demonstrate as evidence of the correctness of your evaluation. Likewise, for fake or false claims, you must demonstrate their status as such with evidence and reasoning. Analysis (detailed examination of the elements or structure of something) is the tool for completing these tasks. Unsupported declarations are bluster without effect.

Ok Ucarr.