Well there's a shocker. As of this moment:

About right
  0% — Sapientia

Some work needed therefore.

Some work needed therefore. — unenlightened

You're right. That'll have to be fixed, like all good polls.

I feel I need to justify my vote. My choice has nothing to do with the order as it was presented in the previous Poll.
I have carefully weighted each alternative and chosen the one that comes closest to my own convictions.

You should conduct multiple polls with the answers arranged differently so as not to influence how people vote.

Fair enough, although to achieve balance and give members a chance to complain a bit more, I propose a new poll, the Poll of Standard Moderation Standards Poll as follows:

The moderation on this site is:

1) Preposterous
2) Preposterous
3) Preposterous

Maybe this one needs to go in the Philosophy of Science category. :B

I hestitated whether to click "About right". I think that "About right" is about right. I'm surprised that we weren't offered the option "About right" because I would have chosen that one for preference.

Nobody clicked the third option, which is telling.

I was tempted, but I didn't want to provoke or discourage what is an excellent forum.

The things I do for you.

Now you've ruined it. :(

Oh, what? And here I was thinking I... anyway, I'm too sleepy to figure out humorous response.

I forgive you. Let's be friends again and set an example for everyone.

How about

Okay then... :’(

The moderation on this site is:

• About right (for moderators)
• About right (for members)
• About right (for banned members)

As a moderator, I noted something missing in the poll, so I made a minor change.

I suggest that I am given moderator position for 10mins to make a necessary amendment to the amended poll.

It would read as follows:

"HANOVER IS WAS GREAT. LET'S MAKE HANOVER GREAT AGAIN!"

Red is catching up. There is still hope.

Is that one of the ones where if you stare at it for more than ten seconds, you go insane?