• YIOSTHEOY
    76
    I think self preservation needs to be the prime motivation, at least from a logical perspective.

    Heroism is appropriate when personal objective ethics and morals appear in a crisis and warrant a noble sacrifice or grave risk however.

    Almost everyone would be heroic for the benefit of their loved ones, including their pets -- horses, ponies, dogs, cats, etc. I love my cat.

    I will protect and defend anyone within reasonable bounds where it is morel likely that I can assist them than it is likely that I will suffer injury to myself. That is the Masonic Creed.

    A small risk of injury is not necessarily a bad thing. An overwhelming risk of injury with no likelihood of being able to intervene successfully is rash however.
12Next
bold
italic
underline
strike
code
quote
ulist
image
url
mention
reveal
youtube
tweet
Add a Comment

Welcome to The Philosophy Forum!

Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.