Simple logic can not be this hard to grasp.I don't care whether you agree with claims A and B. You claimed that they were not the same, i.e. that claim C is not correct — John
No it isn't. C is a claim about what we (can) think and perceive qua what we think and perceive. A and B are claims about what reality consists of. The big clues are that C begins with "What we perceive and think," where it goes on to make a statement about what we perceive and think, whereas A and B begin with "There is no reality apart from." Now maybe you had something else in mind, but I'm talking about what you wrote.Because C is the claim that A and B are equivalent, — John
That's not a claim about what we perceive and think?No, C is the claim that what we perceive and think about it is equivalent to what we can perceive and think about it. — John
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.