Dawkins is @S’s mentor.

Ok, I will leave you with this...

"Noah is a fanatical religious stupid head".
-Richard Dawkins

Ok, if that is what works for them...but what about nice, gentle things like freedom and morals, do you not like these easy subjects?

But you don't like it when they bounce back with force and hit you in the face. You prefer to play catch with people who throw like a little girl. :grin:

That’s your interpretation. You’re discounting the person’s perceived experience because it doesn’t fit with your preconceived model. — Noah Te Stroete

How are they perceiving the time that they're experiencing the phenomena, though?

Basically, it's saying, "Okay, this phenomena is occurring. Now, how are we pegging it to a particular time frame?" You claimed that it's happening when there's no perceptible brain activity. How would we know that?

I also would like to discuss the registered tendency that intelligent people have to do not being able to relate to others.

I believe we could have no knowledge of them or know anything about them. — Noah Te Stroete

How would you know that I'm self-aware?
You can't experience another's self-awareness (or you'd be them instead).
Doesn't mean you're the only one that's self-aware, though.
Confusing epistemics and ontology leads to the dark side.
We know about other things by interacting, not by becoming them.

How is energy spirit? Can you explain in detail.

By “spirit,” I am giving a name to the basic substance. You can call it “energy,” “force,” or “potentiality,” if you like. “Spirit” just sounds like an amalgam of these ideas, and it jives with consciousness and the nature of qualia. — Noah Te Stroete

It had been previously established in this thread that this is all highly speculative. Take the OP with a grain of salt.

Matter doesn't have qualities.

Are you serious?
I don't think it's worth it.