There are in contemporary philosophy debates over deflationary character of metaphysic. It has two main cores: that metaphysic questions are trivial, and answers are obvious, and that metaphysic questions are verbal, they are about use of words, not about facts.
I don't believe, that there are questions completly werbal, and I think that every discussion has some base in real world.
Let's look at example, which seems to be popular, I found it in Hirsch's paper "Physical-Object Ontology, Verbal Disputes, and Common Sense" and in Sider's lecture "Is Metaphysics Abut the Real World":
The question is if a glass is kind of a cup? It may look like verbal dispute, but suppose that you are asking somebody to give you a cup of somethig to drink. When you want something in which you can drink soda, you may prefer to include glasses in cups. On the other hand, when you want tea, and you are afraid that glass would broke because of heat, you prefer to distinguish glass from cups.
Maybe some discussions over names looks like verbal, but even if we are arguing how to name our dog, there can be fact that influence our decision. All discussion are grounded in facts.