Gregory, are you a Gregorian by conviction of faith?

You switched topics several times in your post.

Ugliness is not the original sin. first switch.

Substance is not sin.

Privatization is a sin, but not synonymous with sin.

Several switches later:
Child rape is not physically good (for the child)

Modern art is neither child rape, nor sinfulness

There are other alternatives to explain the logic of the post. They are, in no particular order, but alphabetical, Alzheimers, Confusionism, Dementia, Kaposi's sarcoma, philosopher's stone**, psychosis, schizophrenia, syphillis (advanced stage) and Wittgenstein.

** as in "Excuse me, while I kiss the sky"-- Jimi Hendrix

Rude, false, ignorant

How would a thomist answer how God sustains ugly things in existence? A clear answer please gmbaa.

How would a thomist answer how God sustains ugly things in existence? A clear answer please — Gregory

The existence of evil brings about a greater good.

Theists don't just say that God allows evil. God sustains the world. So God is right their sustaining the murderer, the rapist, and sexual sinner as they do their acts. I consider this a refutation of classical theism

He said that original sin is a physical sin written in our genes. — Gregory

What sin are we discussing?

Is it one of the capital sins or just a minor sin?

Would it be moral for a god to create us to sin, then punish us forever for just following the nature god put into us?

Regards
DL

The existence of evil brings about a greater good. — frank

??

How does a rape contribute to the greater good, and if it does, why are there laws against it?

Regards
DL