• Moliere
    6.1k
    It does when I think on it in a universal sense -- it's not like I know which way is what. That's sort of Kant's point: Keep on arguing which way you want, it'll be interesting, but it won't effect scientific knowledge and you'll never know which is what.

    If Kant thought it worthy addressing philosophically then I have a hard time arguing determinism isn't even plausible in the manner you described.
  • Astorre
    151


    I wonder if someone who doesn't exist at all can question his own existence or non-existence?
123Next
bold
italic
underline
strike
code
quote
ulist
image
url
mention
reveal
youtube
tweet
Add a Comment

Welcome to The Philosophy Forum!

Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.