• Pieter R van Wyk
    77
    Bye! At least I got an answer to my question.
  • Outlander
    2.7k
    Bye! At least I got an answer to my question.Pieter R van Wyk

    Oh, don't mind him. He's just a bit miffed his series of YouTube video lectures on philosophy didn't quite take off as he may have wished or expected. :wink:

    Are you really that nice old man in your profile picture? What a fascinating life you must have lived. I do wish you'd share more, perhaps in the Lounge or Shoutbox? It's fine if not. Time is no commodity, for any of us, really. :confused:
  • Pieter R van Wyk
    77
    @Outlander
    Thank you for your kind words and yes the picture in my profile is actually mine. As for the "nice old man" ... that would depend on whom you ask: my grandchildren might agree, might not.

    At the moment I do not have any more pertinent questions for this forum. I will comment on some of the other discussions though. It is difficult to share more of my work: 'If I show you a few pieces of a jigsaw puzzle, they are the only things that you will see - a few pieces of a jigsaw puzzle. I had to build the puzzle to the extent that the picture starts to appear for you to understand the picture that I see.' p232 How I Understand Things. The Logic of Existence

    What exactly is the purpose, extent and method of the Lounge and Shoutbox? Could it help me get a decent, critical, honest review of my work?
  • Outlander
    2.7k
    What exactly is the purpose, extent and method of the Lounge and Shoutbox?Pieter R van Wyk

    Oh, my good sir, that depends wholly and entirely upon whom you ask! Some people consider the Lounge a metaphorically graveyard of sorts, where threads that are less than popular are sent to die. Others consider it a place to test one's ideas and theories to see how weighted they are, as far as value. Sort of a "throwing what have you at the wall to see what sticks" kind of free for all arena. As for me? I just use it to play Chess. :smile:

    The Shoutbox is a bit of a random, sort of free-for-all chat. Not unlike the Lounge. Just a social element for "social-ness" sake, I suppose. That said, I've read many a great tale on such a venue. Just a place where if you have something on your mind you think others might find of value, no matter how small, so long as it's genuine, you might wish to comment on and just see what others have to say. Mutual engagement and mutual entertainment, one might reduce such to. Not unlike the regular forum, in which strict rules and prose are to be expected. Just a bit of a fun place really, to speak with others like-minded who may generally hold such concepts to a bit lower standard of necessity than the common person these days.

    Could it help me get a decent, critical, honest review of my work?Pieter R van Wyk

    It most certainly could. Though, and I don't mean to impose, are you familiar with recording and uploading video? It might do wonders to get your message across. It's quite simple these days, really. Why, even opening up YouTube almost explains the process perfectly. One side note, however. This website has an odd reputation for people "promoting their work" (which, unlike yours, is generally not of high quality) so the site owner, and as a result his staff, tend to frown upon self-promotion in general. But if done with tact, subtly, perhaps in a link in one's profile or as I said, interesting and engaging videos, such might occur. Such might occur.

    It's great to have a published author engaging here, I'm sure @Jamal would agree. That said, there's a bit of a taboo in regards to self-promotion as far as links and book names and whatnot. But anything short of that, let this venue be your oyster, not unlike the market squares of olde! :smile:
  • I like sushi
    5.2k
    You think this is at all accurate?:

    Our solar system is a finely balanced many-body problem, quite difficult to solve mathematically. A two-body problem can be solved analytically but a many-body problem can only be solved numerically. However, please consider the gravitational force exerted on system earth by the following celestial bodies and by system earth on these bodies:

    F(sun) = 3.52E22 newton
    F(moon) = 1.98E20 newton
    F(Neptune) = 2.21E15 newton

    In comparison, the worlds total population exerts a force of 4.86E12 newton on system earth.

    If any of these celestial bodies would be "removed" from the solar system this fine balance would be catastrophically disrupted and the expected environmental disaster would not be a political talking point, it would be de facto. Or if our solar system evolved sans Neptune, our system earth would have evolved completely different to what it did.
    Pieter R van Wyk

    Really? :D
  • I like sushi
    5.2k
    As for the "nice old man" ... that would depend on whom you ask: my grandchildren might agree, ↪I like sushi might not.Pieter R van Wyk

    I am not at all concerned about your character. Maybe you are a saint for all I know. Regardless, you are wrong. That is what matters here.
  • Outlander
    2.7k
    You think this is at all accurate?:I like sushi

    I tend not to involve myself in matters of which I am unfamiliar with. These are titles, vernacular, and above all formulae and mathematics I have never made the decision to study or be informed of, but above all remain ignorant of.

    I do agree he is correct as to the "if one planetary body, no matter how minute or seemingly insignificant is removed, great disarray and unrest would follow" claim. I'm fairly certain that's scientific knowledge. Whether those great vanguards who protect such wish to promote it or not.
  • I like sushi
    5.2k
    I suggest you learn a little about gravity first and the scales we are talking about. It would do next to nothing.
  • Outlander
    2.7k
    I suggest you learn a little about gravity first and the scales we are talking about. It would do next to nothing.I like sushi

    Gravity will be there. It was there before humans and will surely be there after. Why the rush? Why the offense at human error? You act as if you couldn't be an example of such. Couldn't any of us? At least at some point in life? :confused:
  • wonderer1
    2.3k
    I do agree he is correct as to the "if one planetary body, no matter how minute or seemingly insignificant is removed, great disarray and unrest would follow" claim.Outlander

    So we better not send anything from the Earth to the Moon or to Mars and leave it there, because doing so would result in the solar system flying apart.

    Oh wait, we're doomed.
  • I like sushi
    5.2k
    Maybe I should have been nicer.

    I will keep in mind what you have pointed out here in the future.
  • Outlander
    2.7k
    So we better not send anything from the Earth to the Moon or to Mars and leave it there, because doing so would result in the solar system flying apart.wonderer1

    No human being has ever created or destroyed a planetary body. That would be space debris. Or a satellite, at best.

    You're a fun one, now aren't you?
  • Pieter R van Wyk
    77
    This website has an odd reputation for people "promoting their work" (which, unlike yours, is generally not of high quality) so the site owner, and as a result his staff, tend to frown upon self-promotion in general.Outlander

    I have been warned, quite sternly, about self promoting, but was informed that I may reference my own work. I am trying my level best to adhere to this, quite ambiguous, rule.

    Interesting place, this forum. I ask a simple question about a definition of a system and end up arguing about absurd nonsensical planetary questions. How odd.
  • Outlander
    2.7k
    I ask a simple question about a definition of a system and end up arguing about absurd nonsensical planetary questions. How odd.Pieter R van Wyk

    Is it really, though? They do call it "the solar system", after all. Surely there's some relevance. Fleeting or not. :grin:
  • Pieter R van Wyk
    77
    @Outlander
    Okey-okey, I get your point. But consider this:

    We speak of the solar system.
    We cannot agree on what, exactly, is a system.
    We make the absurd postulate that one planet could be removed from the solar system.
    This could tell us whether the solar system is in fact a system.

    Which clever philosopher stated that from a false (absurd) statement, anything can be proved?
  • Pieter R van Wyk
    77
    Regardless, you are wrong.I like sushi

    Yes, you are right (I am wrong); but then, anything can be proved from an absurd statement.
  • I like sushi
    5.2k
    The Solar System is a system.

    You were just factually wrong. Absurdity has nothing to do with this.

    Pluto is no longer a 'Planet' it is a 'Dwarf Planet'. Systems can change without losing structure.
12345Next
bold
italic
underline
strike
code
quote
ulist
image
url
mention
reveal
youtube
tweet
Add a Comment

Welcome to The Philosophy Forum!

Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.